Rigatoni with corporate meatballs, smoked mozzarella
-
Rigatoni with corporate meatballs, homemade sauce from crushed tomatoes, smoked mozzarella.
Ground beef is too expensive to even think about making meatballs. So corporate is going to have to work for now.
Cost per person $2.75.
What are “corporate meatballs”?
-
What are “corporate meatballs”?
This is covered extensively in another comment on this post.
-
Oh, like commodity pizza
LLC Linguine
-
Google’s AI will often pretend to have heard of a phrase even if it hasn’t. Usually it can infer pretty well but sometimes it will just be flat out wrong. In this case it nailed it.
As far as I know Gemini’s knowledge base for each response is the first few responses, so that is its entire worldview aha. A few separate mentions of the term could amount to ‘common usage’ for the AI, plus the bias that of course, as I searched for it and the results are sorted based on relevance and SEO factors, the AI’s sources are heavily biased toward it’s existence, leading to a misrepresentation of commonality…
-
This is covered extensively in another comment on this post.
It would cost you nothing to include a link to said comment
-
Got any recommendations for pork meatball recipes? I have a grinder that I’ve been itching to bust out over winter.
i mean you can just make normal meatballs, the meat barely matters and i’m pretty sure it’ll even work fine with soy mince.
For a specific recipe i know works, here’s bog standard swedish meatballs, you probably want to make a half size batch:
- 1kg ground meat
- 3dl milk
- 150ml breadcrumbs
- 1 onion, grated or finely diced
- 2 eggs
- 10ml salt
- 2ml black pepper
- 5ml sugar
mix together the milk and breadcrumbs in a big bowl and let it sit for 10 minutes, then add the rest and mix it all together really well. Then form into balls and fry, or if you want to be fancy you can form the balls, boil them, THEN fry. That shit is poppin.
-
It would cost you nothing to include a link to said comment
Corporate is trying to cut costs, and unnecessary links add to expenses
-
It would cost you nothing to include a link to said comment
There aren’t 500 comments to scroll through. I cooked the food, I had the conversation, it was covered in depth right here in this post. I am under no obligation by any stretch of netiquette to link to a thread within the same post. This isn’t the days of Usenet where post IDs were handy because a post might not propagate to all the servers. You have all the context you need to find the replies without me going through the even minimal labor of finding the link and handing it to you. Let’s not encourage entitlement behavior here.
-
Brought to you by Carl’s Jr.
Fuck you, I’m eating
-
There aren’t 500 comments to scroll through. I cooked the food, I had the conversation, it was covered in depth right here in this post. I am under no obligation by any stretch of netiquette to link to a thread within the same post. This isn’t the days of Usenet where post IDs were handy because a post might not propagate to all the servers. You have all the context you need to find the replies without me going through the even minimal labor of finding the link and handing it to you. Let’s not encourage entitlement behavior here.
Ok. Bye. Downvoted.
-
There aren’t 500 comments to scroll through. I cooked the food, I had the conversation, it was covered in depth right here in this post. I am under no obligation by any stretch of netiquette to link to a thread within the same post. This isn’t the days of Usenet where post IDs were handy because a post might not propagate to all the servers. You have all the context you need to find the replies without me going through the even minimal labor of finding the link and handing it to you. Let’s not encourage entitlement behavior here.
You could have easily just omitted the word corporate from your post
Or replaced it with “store-bought” or “pre-made” or “basic” or whatever
But you chose to include a deliberately obscure term and then wait until the comments to define it?
The simplest explanation is you are hunting for downvotes because you get satisfaction from annoying people
-
You could have easily just omitted the word corporate from your post
Or replaced it with “store-bought” or “pre-made” or “basic” or whatever
But you chose to include a deliberately obscure term and then wait until the comments to define it?
The simplest explanation is you are hunting for downvotes because you get satisfaction from annoying people
I cook the food I get to decide how to describe it.
Hunting downvotes? I post here nearly every day. I’m literally a moderator here. Your idea doesn’t even pass the sniff test.
-
Rigatoni with corporate meatballs, homemade sauce from crushed tomatoes, smoked mozzarella.
Ground beef is too expensive to even think about making meatballs. So corporate is going to have to work for now.
Cost per person $2.75.
That looks really incredible!
-
There aren’t 500 comments to scroll through. I cooked the food, I had the conversation, it was covered in depth right here in this post. I am under no obligation by any stretch of netiquette to link to a thread within the same post. This isn’t the days of Usenet where post IDs were handy because a post might not propagate to all the servers. You have all the context you need to find the replies without me going through the even minimal labor of finding the link and handing it to you. Let’s not encourage entitlement behavior here.
I love how it would’ve taken much fewer words to just explain what you meant.
-
It would cost you nothing to include a link to said comment
What’s great is that their replies took more effort than just saying store bought meatballs
