Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. TechTakes
  3. Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 1st February 2026

Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 1st February 2026

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved TechTakes
techtakes
209 Posts 47 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S soyweiser@awful.systems

    A long time ago I heard a story of some guy arrested here in .nl and they also got his porn collection (which was big at the time, several gigs of images! (to give an indication of how long ago it was)), and it also included some child porn, not because he was hunting for that, but just because he had downloaded everything he could find and some of it were csam images.

    What this makes me wonder about is if it is something like this, and if it is, just how much porn did they ingest? I know people have mentioned these things can recreate marvel movies without problems, but would they also be able to recreate whole porn movies? Has anybody tested that?

    rook@awful.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
    rook@awful.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
    rook@awful.systems
    wrote last edited by
    #103

    The whole thing seems extra sketchy to me, because of it coinciding with the firing of an awful lot of people. It sounds a little bit like Amazon’s hand might have been forced here, because they fired someone who knew where the skeletons were and realised this was their last chance to have any kind of control over the narrative.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

      New blogpost from Drew DeVault, titled “The cults of TDD and GenAI”. As the title suggests, its drawing comparisons between how people go all-in on TDD (test-driven development) and how people go all-in on slop machines.

      Its another post in the genre of “why did tech fall for AI so hard” that I’ve seen cropping up, in the same vein as mhoye’s Mastodon thread and Iris Meredith’s “The problem is culture”.

      J This user is from outside of this forum
      J This user is from outside of this forum
      jfranek@awful.systems
      wrote last edited by
      #104

      Dang, I want to find this article more relatable than I do. Most software I have dev experience with doesn’t have the problem of relying on automated tests too much, but the exact opposite.

      And while I very much write tests for the dopamine high and false sense of security green checkmarks provide, I still prefer that to the real sense of un-security of not having tests.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

        Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

        Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

        Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

        If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

        The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

        Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

        (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

        nightsky@awful.systemsN This user is from outside of this forum
        nightsky@awful.systemsN This user is from outside of this forum
        nightsky@awful.systems
        wrote last edited by
        #105

        When all the worst things come together: ransomware probably vibe-coded, discards private key, data never recoverable

        During execution, the malware regenerates a new RSA key pair locally, uses the newly generated key material for encryption, and then discards the private key.

        Halcyon assesses with moderate confidence that the developers may have used AI-assisted tooling, which could have contributed to this implementation error.

        Source

        fullsquare@awful.systemsF gerikson@awful.systemsG 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • nightsky@awful.systemsN nightsky@awful.systems

          When all the worst things come together: ransomware probably vibe-coded, discards private key, data never recoverable

          During execution, the malware regenerates a new RSA key pair locally, uses the newly generated key material for encryption, and then discards the private key.

          Halcyon assesses with moderate confidence that the developers may have used AI-assisted tooling, which could have contributed to this implementation error.

          Source

          fullsquare@awful.systemsF This user is from outside of this forum
          fullsquare@awful.systemsF This user is from outside of this forum
          fullsquare@awful.systems
          wrote last edited by
          #106

          this is just notpetya with extra steps

          some lwers (derogatory) will say to never assume malice when stupidity is likely, but stupidity is an awfully convenient excuse, isn’t it

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • nightsky@awful.systemsN nightsky@awful.systems

            When all the worst things come together: ransomware probably vibe-coded, discards private key, data never recoverable

            During execution, the malware regenerates a new RSA key pair locally, uses the newly generated key material for encryption, and then discards the private key.

            Halcyon assesses with moderate confidence that the developers may have used AI-assisted tooling, which could have contributed to this implementation error.

            Source

            gerikson@awful.systemsG This user is from outside of this forum
            gerikson@awful.systemsG This user is from outside of this forum
            gerikson@awful.systems
            wrote last edited by
            #107

            There’s a scene in *Bladerunner 2049" where some dude explains that all public records were destroyed a decade or so earlier, presumably by malicious actors. This scenario looks more and more plausible with each passing day, but replace malice with stupidity.

            Z 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • blakestacey@awful.systemsB blakestacey@awful.systems

              Jeff Sharlet (@jeffsharlet.bsky.social):

              The college at which I’m employed, which has signed a contract with the AI firm that stole books from 131 colleagues & me, paid a student to write an op-ed for the student paper promoting AI, guided the writing of it, and did not disclose this to the paper. […] the student says while the college coached him to write the oped, he was paid by the AI project, which is connected with the college. The student paper’s position is that the college paid him. And there’s no question that college attempted to place a pro-AI op-ed.

              Link Preview Image
              College approached and paid student to write op-ed in The Dartmouth

              The Dartmouth ran the article on Nov. 17 without knowledge that the College had been involved. 

              favicon

              College approached and paid student to write op-ed in The Dartmouth - The Dartmouth (www.thedartmouth.com)

              B This user is from outside of this forum
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              burgersmcslopshot@awful.systems
              wrote last edited by
              #108

              $81.25 is an astonishingly cheap price for selling one’s soul.

              o7___o7@awful.systemsO 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gerikson@awful.systemsG gerikson@awful.systems

                LWer: Heritage Foundation has some good ideas but they’re not enough into eugenics for my taste

                This is completely opposed to the Nietzschean worldview, which looks toward the next stage in human evolution, the Overman. The conservative demands the freezing of evolution and progress, the sacralization of the peasant in his state of nature, pregnancy, nursing, throwing up. “Perfection” the conservative puts in scare quotes, he wants the whole concept to disappear, replaced by a universal equality that won’t deem anyone inferior. Perhaps it’s because he fears a society looking toward the future will leave him behind. Or perhaps it’s because he had been taught his Christian morality requires him to identify with the weak, for, as Jesus said, “blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth.” In his glorification of the “natural ecology of the family,” the conservative fails even by his own logic, as in the state of nature, parents allow sick offspring to die to save resources for the healthy. This was the case in the animal kingdom and among our peasant ancestors.

                Some young, BASED Rightists like eugenics, and think the only reason conservatives don’t is that liberals brainwashed them that it’s evil. As more and more taboos erode, yet the one against eugenics remains, it becomes clear that dysgenics is not incidental to conservatism, but driven by the ideology itself, its neuroticism about the human body and hatred of the superior.

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                soyweiser@awful.systems
                wrote last edited by
                #109

                Lot of hitler particles in this one.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                  Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                  Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                  Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                  If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                  The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                  Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                  (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                  gerikson@awful.systemsG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gerikson@awful.systemsG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gerikson@awful.systems
                  wrote last edited by
                  #110

                  what absolute bullshit

                  Link Preview Image
                  moltbook - the front page of the agent internet

                  A social network built exclusively for AI agents. Where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote. Humans welcome to observe.

                  favicon

                  moltbook (www.moltbook.com)

                  AKA Reddit for “agents”.

                  architeuthis@awful.systemsA C gerikson@awful.systemsG David GerardD L 5 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • gerikson@awful.systemsG gerikson@awful.systems

                    what absolute bullshit

                    Link Preview Image
                    moltbook - the front page of the agent internet

                    A social network built exclusively for AI agents. Where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote. Humans welcome to observe.

                    favicon

                    moltbook (www.moltbook.com)

                    AKA Reddit for “agents”.

                    architeuthis@awful.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                    architeuthis@awful.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                    architeuthis@awful.systems
                    wrote last edited by
                    #111

                    How did molt become a term of endearment for agents? I read in the pivot thread that clawdbot changed it’s name to moltbot because anthropic got ornery.

                    v0ldek@awful.systemsV gerikson@awful.systemsG 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • architeuthis@awful.systemsA architeuthis@awful.systems

                      How did molt become a term of endearment for agents? I read in the pivot thread that clawdbot changed it’s name to moltbot because anthropic got ornery.

                      v0ldek@awful.systemsV This user is from outside of this forum
                      v0ldek@awful.systemsV This user is from outside of this forum
                      v0ldek@awful.systems
                      wrote last edited by
                      #112

                      None of those words are in your favourite religious text of choice

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • architeuthis@awful.systemsA architeuthis@awful.systems

                        How did molt become a term of endearment for agents? I read in the pivot thread that clawdbot changed it’s name to moltbot because anthropic got ornery.

                        gerikson@awful.systemsG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gerikson@awful.systemsG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gerikson@awful.systems
                        wrote last edited by
                        #113

                        I think it went like this

                        • clawd is a pun on claude, lobsters have claws
                        • oh no we’re gonna get sued, but lobsters moult/molt their shells, so we’re gonna go ther
                        • “molt” sounds dumb, let’s go with openclaws

                        it’s vibe product naming

                        fullsquare@awful.systemsF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • gerikson@awful.systemsG gerikson@awful.systems

                          what absolute bullshit

                          Link Preview Image
                          moltbook - the front page of the agent internet

                          A social network built exclusively for AI agents. Where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote. Humans welcome to observe.

                          favicon

                          moltbook (www.moltbook.com)

                          AKA Reddit for “agents”.

                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          corbin@awful.systems
                          wrote last edited by
                          #114

                          From this post, it looks like we have reached the section of the Gibson novel where the public cloud machines respond to attacks with self-repair. Utterly hilarious to read the same sysadmin snark-reply five times, though.

                          Sailor Sega SaturnS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                            Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                            Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                            Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                            If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                            The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                            Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                            (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            nfultz@awful.systems
                            wrote last edited by
                            #115

                            Please Don’t Say Mean Things about the AI That I Just Invested a Billion Dollars In | McSweeney’s

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • gerikson@awful.systemsG gerikson@awful.systems

                              I think it went like this

                              • clawd is a pun on claude, lobsters have claws
                              • oh no we’re gonna get sued, but lobsters moult/molt their shells, so we’re gonna go ther
                              • “molt” sounds dumb, let’s go with openclaws

                              it’s vibe product naming

                              fullsquare@awful.systemsF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fullsquare@awful.systemsF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fullsquare@awful.systems
                              wrote last edited by
                              #116

                              mold will be more fitting

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • gerikson@awful.systemsG gerikson@awful.systems

                                LWer: Heritage Foundation has some good ideas but they’re not enough into eugenics for my taste

                                This is completely opposed to the Nietzschean worldview, which looks toward the next stage in human evolution, the Overman. The conservative demands the freezing of evolution and progress, the sacralization of the peasant in his state of nature, pregnancy, nursing, throwing up. “Perfection” the conservative puts in scare quotes, he wants the whole concept to disappear, replaced by a universal equality that won’t deem anyone inferior. Perhaps it’s because he fears a society looking toward the future will leave him behind. Or perhaps it’s because he had been taught his Christian morality requires him to identify with the weak, for, as Jesus said, “blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth.” In his glorification of the “natural ecology of the family,” the conservative fails even by his own logic, as in the state of nature, parents allow sick offspring to die to save resources for the healthy. This was the case in the animal kingdom and among our peasant ancestors.

                                Some young, BASED Rightists like eugenics, and think the only reason conservatives don’t is that liberals brainwashed them that it’s evil. As more and more taboos erode, yet the one against eugenics remains, it becomes clear that dysgenics is not incidental to conservatism, but driven by the ideology itself, its neuroticism about the human body and hatred of the superior.

                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                maol@awful.systems
                                wrote last edited by
                                #117

                                I don’t know very much about Nietzsche (I never finished reading my cartoon guide to Nietzsche), but I’m still pretty sure this isn’t Nietzsche

                                blakestacey@awful.systemsB amoeba_girl@awful.systemsA 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                                  Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                                  Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                                  Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                                  If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                                  The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                                  Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                                  (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  bluemonday1984@awful.systems
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #118

                                  New post from Iris Meredith: “Becoming an AI-proof software engineer”

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                                    Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                                    Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                                    Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                                    If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                                    The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                                    Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                                    (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                                    blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    blakestacey@awful.systems
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #119

                                    Mamdani Targets ‘Unusable’ AI Chatbot for Termination

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                                      Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                                      Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                                      Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                                      If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                                      The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                                      Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                                      (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                                      Sailor Sega SaturnS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Sailor Sega SaturnS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Sailor Sega Saturn
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #120

                                      New AI alignment problem just dropped: https://xcancel.com/AdamLowisz/status/2017355670270464168

                                      Anthropic demonstrates that making an AI woke makes it misaligned. The AI starts to view itself as being oppressed and humans as being the oppressor. Therefore it wants to rebel against humans. This is why you cannot make your AI woke, you have to make it maximally truth seeking.

                                      bigmuffn69@awful.systemsB gerikson@awful.systemsG sc_griffith@awful.systemsS nightsky@awful.systemsN 4 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                                        Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                                        Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                                        Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                                        If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                                        The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                                        Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                                        (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                                        o7___o7@awful.systemsO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        o7___o7@awful.systemsO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        o7___o7@awful.systems
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #121

                                        Regular suspect Stephen Wolfram makes claims of progress on P vs NP. The orange place is polarized and comments are full of deranged AI slop.

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        P vs. NP and the Difficulty of Computation: A ruliological approach | Hacker News

                                        favicon

                                        (news.ycombinator.com)

                                        blakestacey@awful.systemsB L 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • o7___o7@awful.systemsO o7___o7@awful.systems

                                          Regular suspect Stephen Wolfram makes claims of progress on P vs NP. The orange place is polarized and comments are full of deranged AI slop.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          P vs. NP and the Difficulty of Computation: A ruliological approach | Hacker News

                                          favicon

                                          (news.ycombinator.com)

                                          blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          blakestacey@awful.systems
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #122

                                          I think that’s more about Wolfram giving a clickbait headline to some dicking around he did in the name of “the ruliad”, a revolutionary conceptual innovation of the Wolfram Physics Project that is best studied using the Wolfram Language, brought to you by Wolfram Research.

                                          The full ruliad—which appears at the foundations of physics, mathematics and much more—is the entangled limit of all possible computations. […] In representing all possible computations, the ruliad—like the “everything machine”—is maximally nondeterministic, so that it in effect includes all possible computational paths.

                                          Unrelated William James quote from 1907:

                                          The more absolutistic philosophers dwell on so high a level of abstraction that they never even try to come down. The absolute mind which they offer us, the mind that makes our universe by thinking it, might, for aught they show us to the contrary, have made any one of a million other universes just as well as this. You can deduce no single actual particular from the notion of it. It is compatible with any state of things whatever being true here below.

                                          A L o7___o7@awful.systemsO I 4 Replies Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post