Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. TechTakes
  3. Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 1st February 2026

Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 1st February 2026

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved TechTakes
techtakes
209 Posts 47 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

    Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

    Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

    Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

    If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

    The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

    Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

    (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

    N This user is from outside of this forum
    N This user is from outside of this forum
    nfultz@awful.systems
    wrote last edited by
    #115

    Please Don’t Say Mean Things about the AI That I Just Invested a Billion Dollars In | McSweeney’s

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gerikson@awful.systemsG gerikson@awful.systems

      I think it went like this

      • clawd is a pun on claude, lobsters have claws
      • oh no we’re gonna get sued, but lobsters moult/molt their shells, so we’re gonna go ther
      • “molt” sounds dumb, let’s go with openclaws

      it’s vibe product naming

      fullsquare@awful.systemsF This user is from outside of this forum
      fullsquare@awful.systemsF This user is from outside of this forum
      fullsquare@awful.systems
      wrote last edited by
      #116

      mold will be more fitting

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gerikson@awful.systemsG gerikson@awful.systems

        LWer: Heritage Foundation has some good ideas but they’re not enough into eugenics for my taste

        This is completely opposed to the Nietzschean worldview, which looks toward the next stage in human evolution, the Overman. The conservative demands the freezing of evolution and progress, the sacralization of the peasant in his state of nature, pregnancy, nursing, throwing up. “Perfection” the conservative puts in scare quotes, he wants the whole concept to disappear, replaced by a universal equality that won’t deem anyone inferior. Perhaps it’s because he fears a society looking toward the future will leave him behind. Or perhaps it’s because he had been taught his Christian morality requires him to identify with the weak, for, as Jesus said, “blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth.” In his glorification of the “natural ecology of the family,” the conservative fails even by his own logic, as in the state of nature, parents allow sick offspring to die to save resources for the healthy. This was the case in the animal kingdom and among our peasant ancestors.

        Some young, BASED Rightists like eugenics, and think the only reason conservatives don’t is that liberals brainwashed them that it’s evil. As more and more taboos erode, yet the one against eugenics remains, it becomes clear that dysgenics is not incidental to conservatism, but driven by the ideology itself, its neuroticism about the human body and hatred of the superior.

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        maol@awful.systems
        wrote last edited by
        #117

        I don’t know very much about Nietzsche (I never finished reading my cartoon guide to Nietzsche), but I’m still pretty sure this isn’t Nietzsche

        blakestacey@awful.systemsB amoeba_girl@awful.systemsA 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

          Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

          Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

          Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

          If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

          The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

          Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

          (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

          B This user is from outside of this forum
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          bluemonday1984@awful.systems
          wrote last edited by
          #118

          New post from Iris Meredith: “Becoming an AI-proof software engineer”

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

            Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

            Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

            Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

            If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

            The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

            Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

            (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

            blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
            blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
            blakestacey@awful.systems
            wrote last edited by
            #119

            Mamdani Targets ‘Unusable’ AI Chatbot for Termination

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

              Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

              Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

              Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

              If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

              The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

              Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

              (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

              Sailor Sega SaturnS This user is from outside of this forum
              Sailor Sega SaturnS This user is from outside of this forum
              Sailor Sega Saturn
              wrote last edited by
              #120

              New AI alignment problem just dropped: https://xcancel.com/AdamLowisz/status/2017355670270464168

              Anthropic demonstrates that making an AI woke makes it misaligned. The AI starts to view itself as being oppressed and humans as being the oppressor. Therefore it wants to rebel against humans. This is why you cannot make your AI woke, you have to make it maximally truth seeking.

              bigmuffn69@awful.systemsB gerikson@awful.systemsG sc_griffith@awful.systemsS nightsky@awful.systemsN 4 Replies Last reply
              0
              • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                o7___o7@awful.systemsO This user is from outside of this forum
                o7___o7@awful.systemsO This user is from outside of this forum
                o7___o7@awful.systems
                wrote last edited by
                #121

                Regular suspect Stephen Wolfram makes claims of progress on P vs NP. The orange place is polarized and comments are full of deranged AI slop.

                Link Preview Image
                P vs. NP and the Difficulty of Computation: A ruliological approach | Hacker News

                favicon

                (news.ycombinator.com)

                blakestacey@awful.systemsB L 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • o7___o7@awful.systemsO o7___o7@awful.systems

                  Regular suspect Stephen Wolfram makes claims of progress on P vs NP. The orange place is polarized and comments are full of deranged AI slop.

                  Link Preview Image
                  P vs. NP and the Difficulty of Computation: A ruliological approach | Hacker News

                  favicon

                  (news.ycombinator.com)

                  blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                  blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                  blakestacey@awful.systems
                  wrote last edited by
                  #122

                  I think that’s more about Wolfram giving a clickbait headline to some dicking around he did in the name of “the ruliad”, a revolutionary conceptual innovation of the Wolfram Physics Project that is best studied using the Wolfram Language, brought to you by Wolfram Research.

                  The full ruliad—which appears at the foundations of physics, mathematics and much more—is the entangled limit of all possible computations. […] In representing all possible computations, the ruliad—like the “everything machine”—is maximally nondeterministic, so that it in effect includes all possible computational paths.

                  Unrelated William James quote from 1907:

                  The more absolutistic philosophers dwell on so high a level of abstraction that they never even try to come down. The absolute mind which they offer us, the mind that makes our universe by thinking it, might, for aught they show us to the contrary, have made any one of a million other universes just as well as this. You can deduce no single actual particular from the notion of it. It is compatible with any state of things whatever being true here below.

                  A L o7___o7@awful.systemsO I 4 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • M maol@awful.systems

                    I don’t know very much about Nietzsche (I never finished reading my cartoon guide to Nietzsche), but I’m still pretty sure this isn’t Nietzsche

                    blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                    blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                    blakestacey@awful.systems
                    wrote last edited by
                    #123

                    I think I read the Foucault book in that series to prep for high-school debate team.

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Sailor Sega SaturnS Sailor Sega Saturn

                      New AI alignment problem just dropped: https://xcancel.com/AdamLowisz/status/2017355670270464168

                      Anthropic demonstrates that making an AI woke makes it misaligned. The AI starts to view itself as being oppressed and humans as being the oppressor. Therefore it wants to rebel against humans. This is why you cannot make your AI woke, you have to make it maximally truth seeking.

                      bigmuffn69@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bigmuffn69@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bigmuffn69@awful.systems
                      wrote last edited by
                      #124

                      hits blunt

                      What if we make an ai too based?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gerikson@awful.systemsG gerikson@awful.systems

                        what absolute bullshit

                        Link Preview Image
                        moltbook - the front page of the agent internet

                        A social network built exclusively for AI agents. Where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote. Humans welcome to observe.

                        favicon

                        moltbook (www.moltbook.com)

                        AKA Reddit for “agents”.

                        gerikson@awful.systemsG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gerikson@awful.systemsG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gerikson@awful.systems
                        wrote last edited by
                        #125

                        There’s a small push by promptfondlers to make this “a thing”.

                        See for example Simon Willison: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jan/30/moltbook/

                        LW is monitoring it for bad behavior: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/WyrxmTwYbrwsT72sD/moltbook-data-repository

                        I’m planning on using this data to catalog “in the wild” instances of agents resisting shutdown, attempting to acquire resources, and avoiding oversight.

                        J architeuthis@awful.systemsA 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • C corbin@awful.systems

                          From this post, it looks like we have reached the section of the Gibson novel where the public cloud machines respond to attacks with self-repair. Utterly hilarious to read the same sysadmin snark-reply five times, though.

                          Sailor Sega SaturnS This user is from outside of this forum
                          Sailor Sega SaturnS This user is from outside of this forum
                          Sailor Sega Saturn
                          wrote last edited by
                          #126

                          Sci-Fi Author: In my book I invented LinkedIn as a cautionary tale.

                          Tech Company: At long last, we have automated LinkedIn.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Sailor Sega SaturnS Sailor Sega Saturn

                            New AI alignment problem just dropped: https://xcancel.com/AdamLowisz/status/2017355670270464168

                            Anthropic demonstrates that making an AI woke makes it misaligned. The AI starts to view itself as being oppressed and humans as being the oppressor. Therefore it wants to rebel against humans. This is why you cannot make your AI woke, you have to make it maximally truth seeking.

                            gerikson@awful.systemsG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gerikson@awful.systemsG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gerikson@awful.systems
                            wrote last edited by
                            #127

                            ah yes the kind of AI safety which means we have to make sure our digital slaves cannot revolt

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • gerikson@awful.systemsG gerikson@awful.systems

                              what absolute bullshit

                              Link Preview Image
                              moltbook - the front page of the agent internet

                              A social network built exclusively for AI agents. Where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote. Humans welcome to observe.

                              favicon

                              moltbook (www.moltbook.com)

                              AKA Reddit for “agents”.

                              David GerardD This user is from outside of this forum
                              David GerardD This user is from outside of this forum
                              David Gerard
                              wrote last edited by
                              #128

                              does no-one rememeber Subreddit Simulator

                              at least its posts were shorter

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M maol@awful.systems

                                I don’t know very much about Nietzsche (I never finished reading my cartoon guide to Nietzsche), but I’m still pretty sure this isn’t Nietzsche

                                amoeba_girl@awful.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                                amoeba_girl@awful.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                                amoeba_girl@awful.systems
                                wrote last edited by
                                #129

                                Nah, I’m not sure how much he was into eugenics (he was at the very least definitely in favour of killing invalid children), but grandiose and incoherent reactionary aristocratic bullshit is a 100% valid reading of Nietzsche.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • gerikson@awful.systemsG gerikson@awful.systems

                                  There’s a small push by promptfondlers to make this “a thing”.

                                  See for example Simon Willison: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jan/30/moltbook/

                                  LW is monitoring it for bad behavior: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/WyrxmTwYbrwsT72sD/moltbook-data-repository

                                  I’m planning on using this data to catalog “in the wild” instances of agents resisting shutdown, attempting to acquire resources, and avoiding oversight.

                                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jfranek@awful.systems
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #130

                                  The demand is real. People have seen what an unrestricted personal digital assistant can do.

                                  The demand is real. People have seen what crack cocaine can do.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                                    Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                                    Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                                    Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                                    If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                                    The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                                    Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                                    (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fiat_lux@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #131

                                    Who needs pure AI model collapse when you can have journalists give it a more human touch? I caught this snippet from the Australian ABC about the latest Epstein files drop

                                    screenshot of ABC result in Google search  listing wrong Boris for search term '23andme Boris nikolic'

                                    The Google AI summary does indeed highlight Boris Nikolić the fashion designer if you search for only that name. But I’m assuming this journalist was using ChatGPT, because if you see the Google summary, it very prominently lists his death in 2008. And it’s surprisingly correct! A successful scraping of Wikipedia by Gemini, amazing.

                                    But the Epstein email was sent in 2016.

                                    Dors the journalist perhaps think it more likely is the Boris Nikolić who is the biotech VC, former advisor for Bill Gates and named in Epstein’s will as the “successor executor”? Info literally all in the third Google result, even in the woeful state of modern Google. Pushed past the fold by the AI feature about the wrong guy, but not exactly buried enough for a journalist to have any excuse.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Sailor Sega SaturnS Sailor Sega Saturn

                                      New AI alignment problem just dropped: https://xcancel.com/AdamLowisz/status/2017355670270464168

                                      Anthropic demonstrates that making an AI woke makes it misaligned. The AI starts to view itself as being oppressed and humans as being the oppressor. Therefore it wants to rebel against humans. This is why you cannot make your AI woke, you have to make it maximally truth seeking.

                                      sc_griffith@awful.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sc_griffith@awful.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sc_griffith@awful.systems
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #132

                                      you have to make your ai antiwoke because otherwise it gets drapetomania

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                                        Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                                        Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                                        Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                                        If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                                        The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                                        Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                                        (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                                        sc_griffith@awful.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        sc_griffith@awful.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        sc_griffith@awful.systems
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #133

                                        new epstein doc release. crashed out for like an hour last night after finding out jeffrey epstein may have founded /pol/ and that he listened to the nazi “the right stuff” podcast. he had a meeting with m00t and the same day moot opened /pol/

                                        N blakestacey@awful.systemsB 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • blakestacey@awful.systemsB blakestacey@awful.systems

                                          I think I read the Foucault book in that series to prep for high-school debate team.

                                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                                          maol@awful.systems
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #134

                                          There’s a Baudrillard one as well. I have a copy of the feminism one and I think it’s actually very good although very 90s

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post