Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. F-35s will cost $8.7B more than planned, says auditor general

F-35s will cost $8.7B more than planned, says auditor general

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
12 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
    This post did not contain any content.
    Link Preview Image
    F-35s will cost $8.7B more than planned, says auditor general - The Logic

    Federal spending watchdog finds global tensions driving up jet costs, more troubling contracts for firm behind ArriveCan app.

    favicon

    The Logic (thelogic.co)

    T This user is from outside of this forum
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    tribblesbestfriend@startrek.website
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Oh for fuck sake ! Cancel them !

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    24
    • T tribblesbestfriend@startrek.website

      Oh for fuck sake ! Cancel them !

      R This user is from outside of this forum
      R This user is from outside of this forum
      reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      I am sure the Saab jets would end up costing something stupid like that; but that is because they would be made here and employing more Canadians, who would make the parts.

      lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.caL 1 Reply Last reply
      11
      • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
        This post did not contain any content.
        Link Preview Image
        F-35s will cost $8.7B more than planned, says auditor general - The Logic

        Federal spending watchdog finds global tensions driving up jet costs, more troubling contracts for firm behind ArriveCan app.

        favicon

        The Logic (thelogic.co)

        R This user is from outside of this forum
        R This user is from outside of this forum
        reannlegge@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        I was listening or reading something today, probably, saying that the Canadian military can stock pile parts because they will need so much work done after however flight hours but the military would not actually own the parts until they were installed in the jets. So there could be a part stock piled up here and the US could decide they need it and bam order it to come back even though our jets will need it.

        I know I am just an arm chair general but the Saab jets are looking like a better choice than the CF35’s. Sure pilots will need to be trained on a completely new system rather than an updated old system, but the military has not even started the training on the CF35’s

        lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.caL 1 Reply Last reply
        6
        • R reannlegge@lemmy.ca

          I am sure the Saab jets would end up costing something stupid like that; but that is because they would be made here and employing more Canadians, who would make the parts.

          lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.caL This user is from outside of this forum
          lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.caL This user is from outside of this forum
          lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          And can be maintained here, unlike the F-35.

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          10
          • R reannlegge@lemmy.ca

            I was listening or reading something today, probably, saying that the Canadian military can stock pile parts because they will need so much work done after however flight hours but the military would not actually own the parts until they were installed in the jets. So there could be a part stock piled up here and the US could decide they need it and bam order it to come back even though our jets will need it.

            I know I am just an arm chair general but the Saab jets are looking like a better choice than the CF35’s. Sure pilots will need to be trained on a completely new system rather than an updated old system, but the military has not even started the training on the CF35’s

            lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.caL This user is from outside of this forum
            lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.caL This user is from outside of this forum
            lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            The F-35 requires maintenance to be done in the US.

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
              This post did not contain any content.
              Link Preview Image
              F-35s will cost $8.7B more than planned, says auditor general - The Logic

              Federal spending watchdog finds global tensions driving up jet costs, more troubling contracts for firm behind ArriveCan app.

              favicon

              The Logic (thelogic.co)

              DominusOfMegadeusR This user is from outside of this forum
              DominusOfMegadeusR This user is from outside of this forum
              DominusOfMegadeus
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Don’t forget all the downtime for constantly needed repairs and maintenance, and the obscenely high costs of spare parts.

              1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.caL lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca

                And can be maintained here, unlike the F-35.

                R This user is from outside of this forum
                R This user is from outside of this forum
                reannlegge@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                It is my understanding that they can be maintained here it is just a bunch of BS about Canada not owning the parts until they are installed into the CF-35s. The C is added once they become part of the Canadian military.

                After some small amount of flight hours, like less than a day, they have to be all fixed up as I am sure the Saab jets would need to be but the parts would not be made here and the Canadian Air Force would not own the parts until they were installed.

                I have been in the hangers with all the CF 16’s at the base in Cold Lake, I have touched a 5 minute ready jet. I was a young little person this has got to be coming up on 30 years ago but I cannot imagine the worker bees who looked after those jets being happy that they would need to replace parts on the jets they would not even be sure they could use after say a training run.

                I live in Saskatoon and know when the CF 16’s do there training here every so often. They have to fly into the airport, and I am guessing quickly fill up with jet fuel and take off again, I have never thought of the maintenance they would need to go under after those flights but it makes sense that the jet mechanics would need to keep their skills sharp as well. Sure they do stuff when they are away at whatever base when the shipped off but they also need to do the work here to.

                9 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.caL lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca

                  The F-35 requires maintenance to be done in the US.

                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                  reannlegge@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  They would need to go down there way too frequently. The pilots do training exercises all over Canada to keep their skills sharp and airports ready, I know there was rumours that they would need to go down south to get maintenance but that just does not make sense with how the Air Force operates and the maintenance schedule the jets require.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R reannlegge@lemmy.ca

                    It is my understanding that they can be maintained here it is just a bunch of BS about Canada not owning the parts until they are installed into the CF-35s. The C is added once they become part of the Canadian military.

                    After some small amount of flight hours, like less than a day, they have to be all fixed up as I am sure the Saab jets would need to be but the parts would not be made here and the Canadian Air Force would not own the parts until they were installed.

                    I have been in the hangers with all the CF 16’s at the base in Cold Lake, I have touched a 5 minute ready jet. I was a young little person this has got to be coming up on 30 years ago but I cannot imagine the worker bees who looked after those jets being happy that they would need to replace parts on the jets they would not even be sure they could use after say a training run.

                    I live in Saskatoon and know when the CF 16’s do there training here every so often. They have to fly into the airport, and I am guessing quickly fill up with jet fuel and take off again, I have never thought of the maintenance they would need to go under after those flights but it makes sense that the jet mechanics would need to keep their skills sharp as well. Sure they do stuff when they are away at whatever base when the shipped off but they also need to do the work here to.

                    9 This user is from outside of this forum
                    9 This user is from outside of this forum
                    9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    No such thing as a CF-16…

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • 9 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works

                      No such thing as a CF-16…

                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                      reannlegge@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Once the jet becomes part of the Canadian Air Force it gains the C

                      lazynoobletL 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • R reannlegge@lemmy.ca

                        Once the jet becomes part of the Canadian Air Force it gains the C

                        lazynoobletL This user is from outside of this forum
                        lazynoobletL This user is from outside of this forum
                        lazynooblet
                        wrote on last edited by lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
                        #12

                        Are you are it wasn’t the CF-18?

                        Searching for CF-16 didn’t get me anything but there is a CF-18, been around since the 80s

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2

                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post