Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. U.S. resumed trade talks with Canada on Monday morning, says Carney

U.S. resumed trade talks with Canada on Monday morning, says Carney

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
16 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteS stillpaisleycat@startrek.website

    I feel as though the entire point of this was to make Canadians feel ashamed and discouraged on the day before our national holiday.

    And in that Trump was successful. It’s brutal and bullying propaganda.

    No success of realpolitik in negotiations can undo that.

    The business community and media were calling the digital services tax an unforced error.

    But the real unforced error is Carney getting played to do something destructive to national unity heading into Canada Day.

    This is one of the few cases where his lack of political experience is showing. I’m wondering if his team will let him understand that and see the polling impact.

    Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
    Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
    Value Subtracted
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Agreed. If there’s a greater purpose here, keeping it from Canadians is a pretty big blunder.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • S showroom7561@lemmy.ca

      What’s the point? Even if we reach a deal, it’s not like Trump is stable or trustworthy enough to honour it.

      We MUST keep our threats in place for at least 30 days after Trump’s last threat, or else this off-and-on bullshit will just continue indefinitely. And we should extend that delay every time Trump plays his games.

      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      yeehaw
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      And even if he is stable enough to honor it, he will change his mind in “2 weeks”. Everything is 2 weeks for this guy.

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      5
      • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

        Even if we reach a deal, it’s not like Trump is stable or trustworthy enough to honour it.

        I don’t think this is entirely true - Trump is obviously not trustworthy, but the government has been able to leverage CUSMA to lessen the impact of the attempted tariffs. There seems to be some benefit to having a formal deal in place.

        But I’m definitely not comfortable with this capitulation at all.

        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        There seems to be some benefit to having a formal deal in place.

        Yes, but the “in place” part is what’s in question. You can sign a deal, and the next day Trump can say it was a bad deal and it’s off the table… again.

        Much of the stuff he’s bickering about now are things HE negotiated during his first term! He’ll never be happy, and we have to stop wasting time on this baboon and seek partnerships with leaders who aren’t complete assholes.

        Value SubtractedV 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • C yeehaw

          And even if he is stable enough to honor it, he will change his mind in “2 weeks”. Everything is 2 weeks for this guy.

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          showroom7561@lemmy.ca
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          Everything is 2 weeks Friday for this guy.

          He waits until the last possible moment before the weekend to drop his bi-polar outbursts on social media…

          Assuming he gets to Friday. Shit changes every few hours with him.

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteS stillpaisleycat@startrek.website

            I feel as though the entire point of this was to make Canadians feel ashamed and discouraged on the day before our national holiday.

            And in that Trump was successful. It’s brutal and bullying propaganda.

            No success of realpolitik in negotiations can undo that.

            The business community and media were calling the digital services tax an unforced error.

            But the real unforced error is Carney getting played to do something destructive to national unity heading into Canada Day.

            This is one of the few cases where his lack of political experience is showing. I’m wondering if his team will let him understand that and see the polling impact.

            I This user is from outside of this forum
            I This user is from outside of this forum
            irateanteater@sh.itjust.works
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            I feel as though the entire point of this was to make Canadians feel ashamed and discouraged on the day before our national holiday.And in that Trump was successful.

            The fuck he was. I feel no shame, nor discouragement whatsoever.

            All Trump “won” was getting Carney to scrap a policy that wasn’t even in force yet, effectively gaining nothing. And there’s nothing stopping us from just reimplementing the same policy under some other name that Trump’s dumb ass won’t even notice.

            1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • S sbv@sh.itjust.works

              Yeah, I think that’s been missing from most of the conversation. Our DST was retroactive and higher than the one in the UK (which Trump&co didn’t bitch about). If this version of the tax dies and we can replace it later, but we still gain something by this move then we’re coming out ahead.

              We’ll see what happens.

              O This user is from outside of this forum
              O This user is from outside of this forum
              oldtellus@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              I agree. We can’t know the full reason that it was cancelled, and I doubt we will for a while. Unlike Trump, Carney is smart enough not to ramble about everything and show the world all his cards. Hopefully he pulled this back in order to either roll it into something else, or go in with the EU to turn it into a new deal. With how much he seems to be trying to unite Canada, E.U, and Europe as a whole I wouldn’t be surprised. We will have to wait and see how the 90 days plays out. Nothing is stopping him from turning it back on later.

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • S showroom7561@lemmy.ca

                There seems to be some benefit to having a formal deal in place.

                Yes, but the “in place” part is what’s in question. You can sign a deal, and the next day Trump can say it was a bad deal and it’s off the table… again.

                Much of the stuff he’s bickering about now are things HE negotiated during his first term! He’ll never be happy, and we have to stop wasting time on this baboon and seek partnerships with leaders who aren’t complete assholes.

                Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
                Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
                Value Subtracted
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                It’s geographically impossible for Canada to completely eliminate trade with the US.

                I absolutely agree that it should be minimized, though.

                Avid AmoebaA S 2 Replies Last reply
                3
                • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

                  It’s geographically impossible for Canada to completely eliminate trade with the US.

                  I absolutely agree that it should be minimized, though.

                  Avid AmoebaA This user is from outside of this forum
                  Avid AmoebaA This user is from outside of this forum
                  Avid Amoeba
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Yeah, we should do both. Minimize the damage and reduce reliance. I think quitting cold turkey might lead to worse outcomes, including a possible reorientation towards the US under a prospective reactionary conservative government.

                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

                    It’s geographically impossible for Canada to completely eliminate trade with the US.

                    I absolutely agree that it should be minimized, though.

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    showroom7561@lemmy.ca
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    We can do minimal trade, and only when absolutely necessary, with Blue states.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Avid AmoebaA Avid Amoeba

                      Yeah, we should do both. Minimize the damage and reduce reliance. I think quitting cold turkey might lead to worse outcomes, including a possible reorientation towards the US under a prospective reactionary conservative government.

                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                      greyeyedghost@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Pretty much where I’m at. We absolutely should do everything we can to minimize the impact of American volatility to our economy, but damaging our economy more than necessary to do so is counterproductive. Stringing on the bullshit until we have a clear exit plan is the smart move, distasteful as that may be.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1

                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post