Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. A Carney disaster scenario shower thought

A Carney disaster scenario shower thought

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
4 Posts 2 Posters 8 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Avid AmoebaA This user is from outside of this forum
    Avid AmoebaA This user is from outside of this forum
    Avid Amoeba
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I did support Carney and I hope he does good things, and I don’t think the following scenario would occur but I realize this belief is entirely based on my judgement of Carney’s character which could be wrong.

    I was thinking about the proposed gas pipeline to the east coast. If Carney hopes to be re-elected, he can’t ram a pipeline through Quebec using emergency powers if such exist. Or he’d lose his seats in QC. Instead he’s gotta give significant concessions to QC, like ownership, high royalties, etc. Stuff that he and Blanchet can sell to the Quebecers. I think this is certainly possible for a gas pipeline.

    But then the following disaster scenario occurred to me. He likely has significant Brookfield investments in that blind trust. He likely has a seat open on that board whenever he quits public service. What if he uses emergency powers to ram a whole bunch of infrastructure, through P3s, where the private partner retains ownership, and the partner is Brookfield. Do as many of those as possible, get kicked out of office and sit on Brookfield’s board, that much richer, while we get saddled with an even angrier and vindicated CPC fascism.

    Thoughts?

    Edit: Thanks for wading into my election PTSD nightmare!

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Avid AmoebaA Avid Amoeba

      I did support Carney and I hope he does good things, and I don’t think the following scenario would occur but I realize this belief is entirely based on my judgement of Carney’s character which could be wrong.

      I was thinking about the proposed gas pipeline to the east coast. If Carney hopes to be re-elected, he can’t ram a pipeline through Quebec using emergency powers if such exist. Or he’d lose his seats in QC. Instead he’s gotta give significant concessions to QC, like ownership, high royalties, etc. Stuff that he and Blanchet can sell to the Quebecers. I think this is certainly possible for a gas pipeline.

      But then the following disaster scenario occurred to me. He likely has significant Brookfield investments in that blind trust. He likely has a seat open on that board whenever he quits public service. What if he uses emergency powers to ram a whole bunch of infrastructure, through P3s, where the private partner retains ownership, and the partner is Brookfield. Do as many of those as possible, get kicked out of office and sit on Brookfield’s board, that much richer, while we get saddled with an even angrier and vindicated CPC fascism.

      Thoughts?

      Edit: Thanks for wading into my election PTSD nightmare!

      P This user is from outside of this forum
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      patatas@sh.itjust.works
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Well, you may not have been completely right on every detail, but the way Carney’s government is going, you weren’t far off.

      Avid AmoebaA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P patatas@sh.itjust.works

        Well, you may not have been completely right on every detail, but the way Carney’s government is going, you weren’t far off.

        Avid AmoebaA This user is from outside of this forum
        Avid AmoebaA This user is from outside of this forum
        Avid Amoeba
        wrote on last edited by avidamoeba@lemmy.ca
        #3

        Where did you dig up this ancient post from… 😄

        But yeah things aren’t going spectacularly. A Kier Starmer scenario looks more likely at the moment.

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • Avid AmoebaA Avid Amoeba

          Where did you dig up this ancient post from… 😄

          But yeah things aren’t going spectacularly. A Kier Starmer scenario looks more likely at the moment.

          P This user is from outside of this forum
          P This user is from outside of this forum
          patatas@sh.itjust.works
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          lol yeah sorry was looking through someone else’s comment history (someone who seems quite hostile to criticism of dear leader) and found your post also getting a big pile-on from Canada’s Insufferable Liberal Hordes

          and yeah it ain’t great

          1 Reply Last reply
          0

          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post