Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Canada should follow U.K.'s initiative to lower voting age to 16, says senator

Canada should follow U.K.'s initiative to lower voting age to 16, says senator

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
52 Posts 30 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I iamthetot@sh.itjust.works

    I don’t outwardly oppose the idea, but to be perfectly honest with myself I do not think I was mature enough at sixteen for my opinion to matter at a macro scale.

    F This user is from outside of this forum
    F This user is from outside of this forum
    fireretardant@lemmy.world
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Given the trend of young men moving to the right, it does worry me a bit where the youth of Canada would place their vote and what the future that would create for them would look like.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    7
    • Maple EngineerM Maple Engineer

      80 year olds should not be voting on things that are going to effect 16 year old for the rest of their lives without 16 year old having a voice.

      Civics courses should be mandatory. Misinformation should be prohibited. Politicians should be prohibited from lying.

      H This user is from outside of this forum
      H This user is from outside of this forum
      hellsbelle@sh.itjust.works
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Small change …

      Politicians should be jailed for lying.

      Maple EngineerM 1 Reply Last reply
      10
      • nightowl@lemmy.caN nightowl@lemmy.ca
        This post did not contain any content.
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        theleadensea@sh.itjust.works
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Everyone should be allowed to vote, as they get affected by the laws. Anyone who can comprehend how to vote, should. The only unfortunate things is that prepubescent children are likely to vote exactly with whatever their parents vote for.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • nightowl@lemmy.caN nightowl@lemmy.ca
          This post did not contain any content.
          G This user is from outside of this forum
          G This user is from outside of this forum
          gonzo-rand19
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          I think it could be good. I don’t think it’s a popular position, though. Everyone and their mom is ready with a personal anecdote about how they used to be lazy and ignorant in high school (they’re dedicated and informed now, though, of course) and, as we all know, all teens are the same, so none of them deserve the right to vote.

          T 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • nightowl@lemmy.caN nightowl@lemmy.ca
            This post did not contain any content.
            G This user is from outside of this forum
            G This user is from outside of this forum
            grte@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            I think there’s something to be said for allowing kids to participate in the political system while we still have them in school to teach them about it. Maybe it would help voter turnout rates.

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • H hellsbelle@sh.itjust.works

              Small change …

              Politicians should be jailed for lying.

              Maple EngineerM This user is from outside of this forum
              Maple EngineerM This user is from outside of this forum
              Maple Engineer
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              No objection.

              1 Reply Last reply
              5
              • C cyborganism

                Why? So teenagers, too, can be ignored by the government?

                M This user is from outside of this forum
                M This user is from outside of this forum
                mybrainhurts@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                You know why seniors’ issues tend to be addressed? Because they vote like their lives depend on it and put the rest of us to shame.

                F C 2 Replies Last reply
                6
                • nightowl@lemmy.caN nightowl@lemmy.ca
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  mybrainhurts@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  Hell, the older I get the more I think the voting age should be raised. And after talking politics with some of the youngins (20s) on my various teams, I propose somewhere in the 30s.

                  I’m joking but…

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • nightowl@lemmy.caN nightowl@lemmy.ca
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                    resetp913@lemmynsfw.com
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    I would rather increase it to 25.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • Maple EngineerM Maple Engineer

                      80 year olds should not be voting on things that are going to effect 16 year old for the rest of their lives without 16 year old having a voice.

                      Civics courses should be mandatory. Misinformation should be prohibited. Politicians should be prohibited from lying.

                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
                      #14

                      90 year olds shouldn’t be voting on things that are going to affect 2 year olds for the rest of their lives without 2 year olds having a voice. That argument is kinda vague and baseless.

                      And likewise, why does a 16 year old get to decide how an 80 year old that can’t get to the polls should live their final days? How much OAS they get, or which healthcare they get, etc.

                      Those old people will die soon and the rest of that 16 year olds life they can vote for whatever selfish things they want to have too. It’s annoying to arbitrarily assume old people are just trying to fuck over the younger generation without a care when that would be wildly unpopular with basically all other age groups.

                      Honestly I do not think 16 year olds should get to vote. They’ve barely had a chance to have a job (legally 1 year at most) and they haven’t even applied to university or college yet. They broadly don’t know what responsibility is, they don’t know what work is, and they’re not fully mentally mature.

                      18 sure, life is starting to hit you then. 16 is simply too young and too inexperienced at life to put in a place to decide how we all live.

                      Maple EngineerM 1 Reply Last reply
                      5
                      • F fireretardant@lemmy.world

                        Given the trend of young men moving to the right, it does worry me a bit where the youth of Canada would place their vote and what the future that would create for them would look like.

                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        fleur_@aussie.zone
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        Your telling me the left is gonna have to start taking young men’s issues seriously? The west has fallen

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        9
                        • C cyborganism

                          Why? So teenagers, too, can be ignored by the government?

                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          fleur_@aussie.zone
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          Adulthood is being ignored by your government and watching items you like disappear from the grocery store. Perhaps now teenagers will finally be tolerable and integrate well with society as their dreams die and the light in their eyes fade.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • M mybrainhurts@lemmy.ca

                            You know why seniors’ issues tend to be addressed? Because they vote like their lives depend on it and put the rest of us to shame.

                            F This user is from outside of this forum
                            F This user is from outside of this forum
                            fleur_@aussie.zone
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            Nah brah they legit just have nothing better to do but vote. It’s why seniors have such a strangle hold on democracies. Compulsory voting is a must have. The whole reason why the voting age is being lowered in the UK is because the voter demographics are so skewed to the elderly.

                            M 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • P panda_abyss@lemmy.ca

                              90 year olds shouldn’t be voting on things that are going to affect 2 year olds for the rest of their lives without 2 year olds having a voice. That argument is kinda vague and baseless.

                              And likewise, why does a 16 year old get to decide how an 80 year old that can’t get to the polls should live their final days? How much OAS they get, or which healthcare they get, etc.

                              Those old people will die soon and the rest of that 16 year olds life they can vote for whatever selfish things they want to have too. It’s annoying to arbitrarily assume old people are just trying to fuck over the younger generation without a care when that would be wildly unpopular with basically all other age groups.

                              Honestly I do not think 16 year olds should get to vote. They’ve barely had a chance to have a job (legally 1 year at most) and they haven’t even applied to university or college yet. They broadly don’t know what responsibility is, they don’t know what work is, and they’re not fully mentally mature.

                              18 sure, life is starting to hit you then. 16 is simply too young and too inexperienced at life to put in a place to decide how we all live.

                              Maple EngineerM This user is from outside of this forum
                              Maple EngineerM This user is from outside of this forum
                              Maple Engineer
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              90 year olds aren’t going to vote for education, childcare, etc. They have a few years left to live. 16 year old have their entire lives to live. Look at what happened in Britain. Old people voted to withdraw from the EU which disproportionately harmed young, mobile professionals.

                              P F F 3 Replies Last reply
                              8
                              • F fleur_@aussie.zone

                                Nah brah they legit just have nothing better to do but vote. It’s why seniors have such a strangle hold on democracies. Compulsory voting is a must have. The whole reason why the voting age is being lowered in the UK is because the voter demographics are so skewed to the elderly.

                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                mybrainhurts@lemmy.ca
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                I think you meant to respond to someone else, none of that seemed like a response to what I wrote.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Maple EngineerM Maple Engineer

                                  90 year olds aren’t going to vote for education, childcare, etc. They have a few years left to live. 16 year old have their entire lives to live. Look at what happened in Britain. Old people voted to withdraw from the EU which disproportionately harmed young, mobile professionals.

                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  A lot of 80/90 year olds have family they love.

                                  I get what you’re saying, but I don’t think letting 16 year olds vote is the right move.

                                  Maple EngineerM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • Maple EngineerM Maple Engineer

                                    80 year olds should not be voting on things that are going to effect 16 year old for the rest of their lives without 16 year old having a voice.

                                    Civics courses should be mandatory. Misinformation should be prohibited. Politicians should be prohibited from lying.

                                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jason2357@lemmy.ca
                                    wrote on last edited by jason2357@lemmy.ca
                                    #21

                                    There’s absolutely no argument denying youth the right to vote that wasn’t equally invalid when it was used against other groups. There are uncaring, naive, uninformed, and stupid people in every group, but denying the whole group is wrong. It’s also going to be inconsequential -teenagers make up a tiny fraction of the population. The main reason to do it is that voting young predicts lifetime engagement in the voting process - so limiting it is a bad idea for that reason alone.

                                    I’ll go even further and say that anyone with the mental capacity to be able to follow the rules and instructions, maintain decorum in a polling station, and properly fill out a valid ballot should be allowed a voice in elections. That’s the same criteria we use for legal adults.

                                    roquettequeen@sh.itjust.worksR 1 Reply Last reply
                                    8
                                    • J jason2357@lemmy.ca

                                      There’s absolutely no argument denying youth the right to vote that wasn’t equally invalid when it was used against other groups. There are uncaring, naive, uninformed, and stupid people in every group, but denying the whole group is wrong. It’s also going to be inconsequential -teenagers make up a tiny fraction of the population. The main reason to do it is that voting young predicts lifetime engagement in the voting process - so limiting it is a bad idea for that reason alone.

                                      I’ll go even further and say that anyone with the mental capacity to be able to follow the rules and instructions, maintain decorum in a polling station, and properly fill out a valid ballot should be allowed a voice in elections. That’s the same criteria we use for legal adults.

                                      roquettequeen@sh.itjust.worksR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      roquettequeen@sh.itjust.worksR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      roquettequeen@sh.itjust.works
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      They’re a tiny percentage and then how many of them will even vote, too? I agree. Let the few who care have a vote.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • P panda_abyss@lemmy.ca

                                        A lot of 80/90 year olds have family they love.

                                        I get what you’re saying, but I don’t think letting 16 year olds vote is the right move.

                                        Maple EngineerM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Maple EngineerM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Maple Engineer
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        All 16 year olds pay into the programs that support the few 90 year olds. They’re a pyramid scheme that takes from the young and gives to the old. 16 year olds are old enough to pay taxes and they are old enough to vote.

                                        No vote, no taxes.

                                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • Maple EngineerM Maple Engineer

                                          All 16 year olds pay into the programs that support the few 90 year olds. They’re a pyramid scheme that takes from the young and gives to the old. 16 year olds are old enough to pay taxes and they are old enough to vote.

                                          No vote, no taxes.

                                          P This user is from outside of this forum
                                          P This user is from outside of this forum
                                          panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          Canada’s OAS and CPP are not a pyramid scheme, they’re based on what you actually put in and guaranteed.

                                          They don’t have the solvency issues that US Social Security has.

                                          Maple EngineerM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          3

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post