Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. ‘Ass Backwards’: Canada’s New Legal Posture Post-Bill C-5

‘Ass Backwards’: Canada’s New Legal Posture Post-Bill C-5

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
11 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • streetfestival@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
    streetfestival@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
    streetfestival@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    “It’s a strange thing to find myself more shocked now than at things that the Harper government tried,” said Green MP Elizabeth May, moments before her audio was cut off for the vote to begin, sending the approved bill to the Senate for its final debate.

    The law allows government to scrap almost any federal law or regulation standing in a chosen project’s way, and to pre-approve projects without any review or consent from First Nations. And once those decisions are made, they are final.

    Cresting on a wave of Conservative and Liberal support, Bill C-5 pushed against fierce opposition from First Nations, the NDP, Bloc Québécois, Greens and environmental groups who say the law contravenes hard-won gains on Indigenous rights and environmental protection.

    The trio [BC and ON equivalents too] of fast-track laws have been pitched as a salvo against U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs and roiling economic uncertainty, though some have also noted their resemblance to Trump’s own deregulatory spree.

    “It is really astonishing how quickly this bill has been drafted and then how quickly it is going through Parliament,” said West Coast Environmental Law staff lawyer Anna Johnston. “They’re talking about reinventing the decision-making and regulatory processes for major projects.”

    Link Preview Image
    ‘Ass Backwards’: Canada’s New Legal Posture Post-Bill C-5 | The Tyee

    The Senate-bound law would allow Ottawa to stamp major projects approved before their risks are assessed.

    favicon

    The Tyee (thetyee.ca)

    A ohshit604@sh.itjust.worksO 2 Replies Last reply
    48
    • streetfestival@lemmy.caS streetfestival@lemmy.ca

      “It’s a strange thing to find myself more shocked now than at things that the Harper government tried,” said Green MP Elizabeth May, moments before her audio was cut off for the vote to begin, sending the approved bill to the Senate for its final debate.

      The law allows government to scrap almost any federal law or regulation standing in a chosen project’s way, and to pre-approve projects without any review or consent from First Nations. And once those decisions are made, they are final.

      Cresting on a wave of Conservative and Liberal support, Bill C-5 pushed against fierce opposition from First Nations, the NDP, Bloc Québécois, Greens and environmental groups who say the law contravenes hard-won gains on Indigenous rights and environmental protection.

      The trio [BC and ON equivalents too] of fast-track laws have been pitched as a salvo against U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs and roiling economic uncertainty, though some have also noted their resemblance to Trump’s own deregulatory spree.

      “It is really astonishing how quickly this bill has been drafted and then how quickly it is going through Parliament,” said West Coast Environmental Law staff lawyer Anna Johnston. “They’re talking about reinventing the decision-making and regulatory processes for major projects.”

      Link Preview Image
      ‘Ass Backwards’: Canada’s New Legal Posture Post-Bill C-5 | The Tyee

      The Senate-bound law would allow Ottawa to stamp major projects approved before their risks are assessed.

      favicon

      The Tyee (thetyee.ca)

      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      archangel1313@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I have a feeling this will be the last time the Liberals are going to be in power for a long time. Trudeau was bad enough…but this is worse.

      G R C 3 Replies Last reply
      17
      • A archangel1313@lemmy.ca

        I have a feeling this will be the last time the Liberals are going to be in power for a long time. Trudeau was bad enough…but this is worse.

        G This user is from outside of this forum
        G This user is from outside of this forum
        garbagebagel@lemmy.world
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Trying to feel better knowing that PP would’ve been worse but no… This is just fucking awful. We were screwed either way.

        1 Reply Last reply
        12
        • A archangel1313@lemmy.ca

          I have a feeling this will be the last time the Liberals are going to be in power for a long time. Trudeau was bad enough…but this is worse.

          R This user is from outside of this forum
          R This user is from outside of this forum
          Rentlar
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I can’t say the Liberals have failed yet… but they are taking a very big risk here.

          If this shoehorning in of legislation comes to bite them in the ass, and lawsuits (due to the government not living up to their obligations to First Nations as they said they would) cause the Liberals to fail on their fast-track promise, they’re going to be punished in the next election(s). The electorate in general are giving them some runway for a year to see results though.

          1 Reply Last reply
          5
          • A archangel1313@lemmy.ca

            I have a feeling this will be the last time the Liberals are going to be in power for a long time. Trudeau was bad enough…but this is worse.

            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            cyborganism
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            God dammit. I told people on here how Carney was a bad idea and that I didn’t trust him.

            I was right all along.

            Even my parents, who always voted liberal, regretted their choice. They wished they had voted NDP.

            A 1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • C cyborganism

              God dammit. I told people on here how Carney was a bad idea and that I didn’t trust him.

              I was right all along.

              Even my parents, who always voted liberal, regretted their choice. They wished they had voted NDP.

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              archangel1313@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Unfortunately, in Canada it has little to do with Carney himself, and more to do with keeping the Conservatives out of office. In my riding, it was either vote Liberal or let the Conservatives have the seat.

              A F G 3 Replies Last reply
              13
              • A archangel1313@lemmy.ca

                Unfortunately, in Canada it has little to do with Carney himself, and more to do with keeping the Conservatives out of office. In my riding, it was either vote Liberal or let the Conservatives have the seat.

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Yep. Had the NDP been more popular we would likely have a Conservative government under Poilievre right now. We have a split vote on the left which makes strategic voting an unfortunate necessity.

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                6
                • A archangel1313@lemmy.ca

                  Unfortunately, in Canada it has little to do with Carney himself, and more to do with keeping the Conservatives out of office. In my riding, it was either vote Liberal or let the Conservatives have the seat.

                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                  fireretardant@lemmy.world
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  We desperately need proportional representation. Canada can’t keep going on flipping sides drastically every 10 years and adopting culture war bullshit all while both sidss point fingers at the other instead of actually creating new solutions to the biggest problems Canadians are facing.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  10
                  • A apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca

                    Yep. Had the NDP been more popular we would likely have a Conservative government under Poilievre right now. We have a split vote on the left which makes strategic voting an unfortunate necessity.

                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                    patatas@sh.itjust.works
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    This theory runs into some trouble when you realize the Liberals chose to campaign just as hard in NDP strongholds as they did in Conservative ridings. I will never advocate for “strategic” voting again after that.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • streetfestival@lemmy.caS streetfestival@lemmy.ca

                      “It’s a strange thing to find myself more shocked now than at things that the Harper government tried,” said Green MP Elizabeth May, moments before her audio was cut off for the vote to begin, sending the approved bill to the Senate for its final debate.

                      The law allows government to scrap almost any federal law or regulation standing in a chosen project’s way, and to pre-approve projects without any review or consent from First Nations. And once those decisions are made, they are final.

                      Cresting on a wave of Conservative and Liberal support, Bill C-5 pushed against fierce opposition from First Nations, the NDP, Bloc Québécois, Greens and environmental groups who say the law contravenes hard-won gains on Indigenous rights and environmental protection.

                      The trio [BC and ON equivalents too] of fast-track laws have been pitched as a salvo against U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs and roiling economic uncertainty, though some have also noted their resemblance to Trump’s own deregulatory spree.

                      “It is really astonishing how quickly this bill has been drafted and then how quickly it is going through Parliament,” said West Coast Environmental Law staff lawyer Anna Johnston. “They’re talking about reinventing the decision-making and regulatory processes for major projects.”

                      Link Preview Image
                      ‘Ass Backwards’: Canada’s New Legal Posture Post-Bill C-5 | The Tyee

                      The Senate-bound law would allow Ottawa to stamp major projects approved before their risks are assessed.

                      favicon

                      The Tyee (thetyee.ca)

                      ohshit604@sh.itjust.worksO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ohshit604@sh.itjust.worksO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
                      wrote on last edited by ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
                      #10

                      3 months in folks. This term is going to suck just as much as the Trudeau regime.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • A archangel1313@lemmy.ca

                        Unfortunately, in Canada it has little to do with Carney himself, and more to do with keeping the Conservatives out of office. In my riding, it was either vote Liberal or let the Conservatives have the seat.

                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                        greyeyedghost@lemmy.ca
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        In my riding, only God Himself would have had a chance if He wasn’t running for the conservatives.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post