The science is still very unclear, both from a modeling perspective (what are the pieces of the puzzle and how to connect them), a simplified perspective (what pieces are most important) and a theoretical perspective (what typical behavior should we detect close to the collapse).

Unfortunately, the latter one’s answer seems to be that close to bifurcations in statistical differential equations the variance of a system increases. Decrypting the math: close to a sudden change, we should experience a wider variety of events that usual, in particular more extreme events. This seems to be happening to the AMOC, but support for the claim is still weak and unclear (because the modeling is unclear, so we don’t know what pieces should be included in the problem).

I see Torontario but I don’t kmow what that stuff to the west is.

no no cornwall is as far east as it gets

quebec erasure

Maritimes erasure, too

idk wtf the maritimes and Quebec did to this guy

Don’t worry, it’s all farm land and forest fires x)

If you go far enough, you get racism, followed by unaffordable housing.

damn, what a sad end

I cancelled my (Amazon Canada) Amazon Prime account after I saw Bezos standing behind Trump at the inauguration.

Room up there but what about good careers that aren’t in natural resources?

While that’s true, in America at least the fact that average global temperatures are rising in large part due to human activities has been a significant point of contention with conservatives who seemingly instinctively deny responsibility for anything negative that they and/or their preferred policies are contributing to. They fought against “Global Warming” tooth and nail despite the documented facts. They more begrudgingly accepted “Climate Change” because it could at least be spun more easily into outcomes that didn’t make them look so bad.

I see… thanks for explaining where you were coming from! I honestly only vaguely remember the times when Global Warming was the naming, and here countries are mostly springing in action when talking about the ramifications of Climate Change. Even if we hardly tackle the root cause…

I guess Lloydminster, Saskatoon and Prince Albert are not Canadian cities then.

Or Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Regina, St. John’s, Fredericton, Halifax, Charlottetown, Montreal, …

I mean, it is the lions share of our population down there. And wouldn’t Winnipeg be in it?

By the “Within 100km Range” then Winnipeg would be in it. By this image however it seems as though the highlighted area wouldn’t reach Winnipeg.

Oh is that not what’s depicted? TBH I have trouble getting a sense of scale with a weird slice of a continent like this.