Canada vows to defend Greenland against the US if Trump invades
-
Europe, Canada, and Latin America against US.
US, Russia and Israel. Rest of the world will also (have to) take sides. Only China will stay neutral until it turns the tides at some point being the big winner of it all (similar to the US in WWII).
-
This post did not contain any content.
Canada vows to defend Greenland against the US if Trump invades
Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney said his country would honour its NATO obligations to defend Denmark and Greenland, putting Canada at odds with the US
Express.co.uk (www.express.co.uk)
This is the same “we stand with both” type of speech, just with an exaggerated tabloid interpretation.
-
Oh my God, could this be any worse?
Yes.
But also, headline is misleading.
-
At least there’s only 2/3rds of a white house to burn down this time.
I mean, the burning of the Whitehouse was before the east wing was built in the first place.
-
I’m gonna give Canada a free pass on any war crimes they commit this time
War crimes aren’t cool, it doesn’t matter how mad we all are.
It’s awful that this is so upvoted.
-
War crimes aren’t cool, it doesn’t matter how mad we all are.
It’s awful that this is so upvoted.
It’s OK.
The regime doesn’t recognize international laws.
So, we play Calvin ball.
-
That’s the only route Trump knows.
Fair point
-
Geneva Suggestions.
Remember, it’s not a war crime the first time!
-
It’s OK.
The regime doesn’t recognize international laws.
So, we play Calvin ball.
It’s very explicit that you don’t have to agree with the rules of war, nor do your opponents, for them to exist and apply. You think the people currently jailed in the Hague were fighting in otherwise-clean wars?
If you rape an American, you’re just a rapist.
-
I hope we don’t burn it down, it’s such a pretty building. It’s already been damaged enough by the megalomaniac.
I’d be OK if we just turned it into a Spirit Halloween for a season or something.
burn it to the ground and start fresh with a better system
-
The Americans (government) could stop this at any moment if they choose to.
All the troops will refuse illegal order, duh!
^is this needed? /s^
-
The Americans (government) could stop this at any moment if they choose to.
Oh yeah, let me try…hold on…nope, can’t.
-
Nipple Torture with beavers?
Canada Geese
-
It’s very explicit that you don’t have to agree with the rules of war, nor do your opponents, for them to exist and apply. You think the people currently jailed in the Hague were fighting in otherwise-clean wars?
If you rape an American, you’re just a rapist.
No rape.
But creatively ending lives of Nazi invaders.
If I kill an American I’m a murderer.
If I kill a Nazi, no I didn’t.
-
It’s very explicit that you don’t have to agree with the rules of war, nor do your opponents, for them to exist and apply. You think the people currently jailed in the Hague were fighting in otherwise-clean wars?
If you rape an American, you’re just a rapist.
but the us doesn’t recognise the icc.
-
burn it to the ground and start fresh with a better system
Dinner first, though.
-
Neither does [insert African dictatorship].
-
No rape.
But creatively ending lives of Nazi invaders.
If I kill an American I’m a murderer.
If I kill a Nazi, no I didn’t.
Oh, “creative”, huh. Rape can be a form of torture. It’s the exact same sick, sadistic thing.
-
Oh, “creative”, huh. Rape can be a form of torture. It’s the exact same sick, sadistic thing.
Why u so obsessed with rape? Jfc.
I never mentioned anything to suggest rape at all and you’re all like, oh, rape rape, rapey rape.
Wtf.
I just gonna kill some fucking nazis. Without fulfilling your sexual fantasy or trauma or whatever the fuck you’re on about of Nazi war crime rape.
OK?
-
Why u so obsessed with rape? Jfc.
I never mentioned anything to suggest rape at all and you’re all like, oh, rape rape, rapey rape.
Wtf.
I just gonna kill some fucking nazis. Without fulfilling your sexual fantasy or trauma or whatever the fuck you’re on about of Nazi war crime rape.
OK?
I shine the light where there’s roaches, basically.
None of what you’re saying is original, and past generations of people like you are the reason the blanket prohibitions on genocide, sexual violence and torture had to be committed to paper. Why would I choose to water that down? I pick the thing you don’t want said out loud.
Edit, since you did: Except killing isn’t a war crime, which is what this conversation is about.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login