>The official stressed that police have to believe there are reasons to suspect that the information in question will assist in a criminal investigation, and said there is a mechanism in the bill allowing service providers to apply for judicial review ...
-
The official stressed that police have to believe there are reasons to suspect that the information in question will assist in a criminal investigation, and said there is a mechanism in the bill allowing service providers to apply for judicial review if they are not comfortable handing over information.
But there are also legal consequences for those who don’t comply, including thousands of dollars in fines and possible jail time.
You know exactly what will happen 100% of the time, right?
Time for us to start marching on Ottawa and shut this shit down … 'cause once it passes it’ll have to be challenged in the SCoC to stop it.
-
The official stressed that police have to believe there are reasons to suspect that the information in question will assist in a criminal investigation, and said there is a mechanism in the bill allowing service providers to apply for judicial review if they are not comfortable handing over information.
But there are also legal consequences for those who don’t comply, including thousands of dollars in fines and possible jail time.
You know exactly what will happen 100% of the time, right?
Time for us to start marching on Ottawa and shut this shit down … 'cause once it passes it’ll have to be challenged in the SCoC to stop it.
I love that shitty waffle-talk.
The official stressed that police have to believe there are reasons to suspect that the information in question will assist in a criminal investigation
Cool, so get a warrant, it should be a snap.