Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Methane leaks from dormant oil and gas wells in Canada are seven times worse than thought, McGill study suggests

Methane leaks from dormant oil and gas wells in Canada are seven times worse than thought, McGill study suggests

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
17 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C cm0002@lemmy.world
    This post did not contain any content.
    H This user is from outside of this forum
    H This user is from outside of this forum
    Optional
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    “Than thought”

    Man, I wonder where that “thought” came from

    tehWrapperT 1 Reply Last reply
    17
    • S skozzii@lemmy.ca

      I’m not an oil guy, but since methane has its uses, would there not be a way to capture this gas and sell it?

      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      actuallygoingcrazy@sh.itjust.works
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      It’s a good bit of infrastructure to capture, compress, transport, and sell methane on the market. Since these are “non-producing” wells, I would assume that the leakage is (relatively) low and maybe not be worth the cost of all the setup and maintenance.

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • C cm0002@lemmy.world
        This post did not contain any content.
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        splashjackson@lemmy.ca
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        Looks like the cover to Supermassive Black Hole

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • C cm0002@lemmy.world
          This post did not contain any content.
          T This user is from outside of this forum
          T This user is from outside of this forum
          tribblesbestfriend@startrek.website
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          The page seems down. Could someone forward the study to me

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • T tribblesbestfriend@startrek.website

            The page seems down. Could someone forward the study to me

            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            cm0002@lemmy.world
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            Seems to work for me, but here’s the direct link for the study https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c05602

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • H Optional

              “Than thought”

              Man, I wonder where that “thought” came from

              tehWrapperT This user is from outside of this forum
              tehWrapperT This user is from outside of this forum
              tehWrapper
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              A more correct title would be “7 to 8 times more than originally reported”

              1 Reply Last reply
              13
              • C cm0002@lemmy.world

                Seems to work for me, but here’s the direct link for the study https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c05602

                T This user is from outside of this forum
                T This user is from outside of this forum
                tribblesbestfriend@startrek.website
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                Turns out that all the site for McGill don’t want me to enter

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • A actuallygoingcrazy@sh.itjust.works

                  It’s a good bit of infrastructure to capture, compress, transport, and sell methane on the market. Since these are “non-producing” wells, I would assume that the leakage is (relatively) low and maybe not be worth the cost of all the setup and maintenance.

                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  piccolo@sh.itjust.works
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  Just put a methane generator on them and sell the power onto the grid. Its what many landdfills do with their methane.

                  H 1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • P piccolo@sh.itjust.works

                    Just put a methane generator on them and sell the power onto the grid. Its what many landdfills do with their methane.

                    H This user is from outside of this forum
                    H This user is from outside of this forum
                    hellsbelle@sh.itjust.works
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    Lots of industries just flare it when the winds are blowing the right way, ie: downwind of any Environment Canada sensors.

                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                      This post did not contain any content.
                      sexy_peach@feddit.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sexy_peach@feddit.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sexy_peach@feddit.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      Who is going to prison over that?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        fireretardant@lemmy.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        If only those companies were wealthy enough to do something about it. I guess our only choice is let the tazpayer handle it.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        7
                        • H hellsbelle@sh.itjust.works

                          Lots of industries just flare it when the winds are blowing the right way, ie: downwind of any Environment Canada sensors.

                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          fireretardant@lemmy.world
                          wrote last edited by
                          #17

                          Flaring is much better than just letting the methane escape so it would be a better solution than doing nothing and would be a great stepping stone to a more permanent option. Flaring would be much cheaper than a methane generator or capture device.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          3

                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post