Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. UPDATE: In a statement provided to CBC News, Kawartha Lakes Police Chief Kirk Robertson "touches on the assault charge" handed out to the home owner, after he was the victim of a home invasion.

UPDATE: In a statement provided to CBC News, Kawartha Lakes Police Chief Kirk Robertson "touches on the assault charge" handed out to the home owner, after he was the victim of a home invasion.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
91 Posts 30 Posters 459 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S skozzii@lemmy.ca

    I don’t care what the reason is, if you break into a home - the actual home, you deserve whatever you get, no restrictions.

    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    astralpath@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    I agree that they deserve what they get, but there needs to be some restriction to defense so that someone who has no intent on confrontation doesn’t get their fucking head blown off or smashed in.

    You shouldn’t be able to just intentionally kill someone because they’re in your home, but if they don’t leave immediately, you should be able to royally fuck them up beyond belief until they decide to bail. If they’ve got a weapon and they don’t leave within 5 seconds of you catching them in the house, that’s a different story.

    At that point it should be safe to argue that you were in mortal danger and exacted equal punishment to the invader that they intended to inflict on you. If they don’t leave immediately after being caught, they make a conscious choice to remain in the face of danger. The problem I see is that if someone carrying a weapon in your home is beaten and let go, there’s a chance they hold a grudge against you and come back to exact vengeance.

    You shouldn’t have to move and abandon your home just because some fucking degenerate is butthurt about having their ass beat. If they leave without a fight, let them leave. If they stay while you’ve got a bat or a golf club in your hand, you should have full license to revoke their right to personal safety. This is just my opinion.

    I love my wife more than anything and the thought of someone even threatening her by breaching into our home while she’s there would make it very difficult to remain sane in the moment. I think it would be foolish to treat that as anything other than a mortal threat.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • Captain AggravatedC Captain Aggravated

      I hear my back door kicked in at 3 in the morning, I put on my glasses and load my pistol. My bedroom door opens, there’s a man with a knife. I fire one round. That round pierces his heart and he dies on the spot. Justifiable force.

      Instead, I fired two or three rounds in quick succession, because one round might miss or fail to stop him. Very likely justifiable force. Like any person wouldn’t pull the trigger a couple times in that scenario, right?

      Instead, I fire one round. It hits him in the chest and does serious damage to one lung. He drops the knife, staggers into my living room and collapses. If I shoot him again to finish him in that state, that’s murder.

      I recommend against breaking into houses on this continent.

      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      canconda@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #33

      If I shoot him again to finish him in that state, that’s murder.

      That’s how our laws work to, just you’d need a license to have that gun. You can beat someone’s ass in self defense but if you lay the boots in after they’re out cold that’s its own crime.

      Guarantee that’s the situation here. The fact that the RCMP are withholding details indicates they have a serious case against the guy.

      Nik282000N 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • L leftytighty@slrpnk.net

        Yeah and to be fair it’s not like Canada is much better, but in cases like this one I don’t find it ridiculous that the appropriate use of force is investigated.

        I’m sure this person won’t ultimately end up in jail (the same people in arms over this would also be the first to point out how “lenient” our criminal justice system is…), and if the facts of the matter do show unnecessary force or cruelty (like stabbing an unconscious person) then I feel that it would be justified.

        Anyway, I didn’t mean to paint you with a broad brush I know the average American I interact with is more like me than not, but I’m grateful for the slightly higher valuing of human life here

        L This user is from outside of this forum
        L This user is from outside of this forum
        lepoisson@lemmy.world
        wrote on last edited by
        #34

        Hey, we elected Trump, I also think the average American blows hard. But I was born here and live here and can’t just up and leave in my current circumstances so I just try to do my best to get by.

        It’s a trying time right now around the world and we’re not making it easier for the average person.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • L lost_faith

          You break into a house, threaten the people inside, you get what you deserve. If they break your bones or end your life, THAT is the risk YOU take. Fuck this holding the VICTIM responsible. Not much I like from US law, but stand your ground and castle doctrine really ring true for me after being home invaded, robbed, and beaten by 3 invaders. What did the cops do? fuck all. Next fucker breaks intro my house will be dealing with trauma for the rest of their lives.

          edit: Thank you to all who up AND down voted, and engaged in conversation, I appreciate it, and it was cathartic. I won’t be responding to any more of this post as I have said all I will on this. Remember to not get too mad at dissenting opinions and try to have a great day.

          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          canconda@lemmy.ca
          wrote on last edited by
          #35

          I have been assaulted and defended myself multiple times in Canada. It’s not how you’re describing it where you have some duty of care for the person you’re actively defending yourself from. Your right to defend yourself logically does not include the right to counter-assault or murder others. Guarantee this guy could have stopped but didn’t. That’s 99% of the time what constitutes unreasonable force.

          Plenty of people hospitalize their assailants and don’t get charged. This story is rage-bait.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          5
          • D dermanus@lemmy.ca

            IMO an important fact is the intruder was charged with possessing a weapon for a dangerous purpose.

            That raises the threshold of reasonable force quite a bit in my eyes, including “life threatening injuries”

            Now he shouldn’t keep beating him when he’s down and out but I’m sympathetic to the invadee so far.

            That’s what judges are for, I’m curious how it comes out.

            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            canconda@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #36

            Exactly. Canadian laws are design to incentivize de-escalating the level of violence. Unlike American laws which incentivize jumping straight to lethal force.

            Nik282000N 1 Reply Last reply
            6
            • ikidd@lemmy.worldI ikidd@lemmy.world

              Give homeowners the same benefit of the doubt cops get when they kill someone that threatens them. Probably more because they aren’t trained to deal with immediate threats and evaluate the options like a cop would.

              Asking some poor bastard whose never had an altercation and that’s scared of being killed or their family being harmed to evaluate a proportional response in seconds is pretty unrealistic. And then making them go through months of legal hassle and cost to prove that what they did in that moment was correct is cruel and unreasonable.

              C This user is from outside of this forum
              C This user is from outside of this forum
              canconda@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by canconda@lemmy.ca
              #37

              Give homeowners the same benefit of the doubt

              Plenty of people defend themselves without getting charged. Guarantee this guy could have stopped but didn’t. That’s 99% of what constitutes unreasonable force.

              Everyone who thinks he was automatically charged for fighting back and winning is misinformed.

              Canadians have a legal right to defend themselves. But logically that doesn’t grant you the right to counter-assault or murder others.

              The fact that the RCMP are not releasing any details indicates they have a real case against this guy. For all we know he punched him out than laid the boots on his unconscious body.

              ikidd@lemmy.worldI 1 Reply Last reply
              6
              • C canconda@lemmy.ca

                I have been assaulted and defended myself multiple times in Canada. It’s not how you’re describing it where you have some duty of care for the person you’re actively defending yourself from. Your right to defend yourself logically does not include the right to counter-assault or murder others. Guarantee this guy could have stopped but didn’t. That’s 99% of the time what constitutes unreasonable force.

                Plenty of people hospitalize their assailants and don’t get charged. This story is rage-bait.

                L This user is from outside of this forum
                L This user is from outside of this forum
                lost_faith
                wrote on last edited by
                #38

                Yes, hindsight is 20/20. When you are calm you can realize you went too far. In the moment, you are more concerned with survival, the Adrenalin is flowing and if there is no way to escape ie; physically running is not an option, the fight gets overwhelming. Like I said, break into my house and I will defend myself, if it costs you the use of limbs, brain function, or life, that is a choice YOU made breaking into the house. When I was younger I tried the CORRECT thing, assault, loss of more than I could afford to lose as I liked eating at least enough to live, the cops were totally useless and did nothing, several times. Now I am at the stage of, get the thief to leave but there are very useful objects all over the house, can you say trauma???, and I will NOT be a fucking victim again.

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • L lost_faith

                  You break into a house, threaten the people inside, you get what you deserve. If they break your bones or end your life, THAT is the risk YOU take. Fuck this holding the VICTIM responsible. Not much I like from US law, but stand your ground and castle doctrine really ring true for me after being home invaded, robbed, and beaten by 3 invaders. What did the cops do? fuck all. Next fucker breaks intro my house will be dealing with trauma for the rest of their lives.

                  edit: Thank you to all who up AND down voted, and engaged in conversation, I appreciate it, and it was cathartic. I won’t be responding to any more of this post as I have said all I will on this. Remember to not get too mad at dissenting opinions and try to have a great day.

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  Hemingways_Shotgun
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #39

                  Simply put, if the invader is immobilized and no longer a threat, but you continue to beat them, it’s not self-defence anymore, it’s vengeance. That’s the law in Canada and I’m okay with that.

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  10
                  • L lost_faith

                    Yes, hindsight is 20/20. When you are calm you can realize you went too far. In the moment, you are more concerned with survival, the Adrenalin is flowing and if there is no way to escape ie; physically running is not an option, the fight gets overwhelming. Like I said, break into my house and I will defend myself, if it costs you the use of limbs, brain function, or life, that is a choice YOU made breaking into the house. When I was younger I tried the CORRECT thing, assault, loss of more than I could afford to lose as I liked eating at least enough to live, the cops were totally useless and did nothing, several times. Now I am at the stage of, get the thief to leave but there are very useful objects all over the house, can you say trauma???, and I will NOT be a fucking victim again.

                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                    canconda@lemmy.ca
                    wrote on last edited by canconda@lemmy.ca
                    #40

                    The courts very much factor in if someone is acting in the moment or if they cognitively chose to do something. That’s like a huge thing. End of the day if someone can’t stop themselves from ground and pounding an unconscious person to death, than they are also a problem. The inability to control yourself or a violent situation are risk factors for anyone who doesn’t train martial arts.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • A Hemingways_Shotgun

                      Simply put, if the invader is immobilized and no longer a threat, but you continue to beat them, it’s not self-defence anymore, it’s vengeance. That’s the law in Canada and I’m okay with that.

                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      lost_faith
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #41

                      So, you must not let the adrenaline flow to help you out, got it. I am not a very large man (was an even smaller kid) compared to the average, I have been victimized many times. When I did win a fight in grade school, I almost chocked the kid out completely, he didn’t get up right away when I did finally come back to myself, after he hit me once I only saw black shapes in a red haze I had no idea what I had done. I got in shit, he who started it got to leave with no punishment. So yeah… sure

                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C canconda@lemmy.ca

                        The courts very much factor in if someone is acting in the moment or if they cognitively chose to do something. That’s like a huge thing. End of the day if someone can’t stop themselves from ground and pounding an unconscious person to death, than they are also a problem. The inability to control yourself or a violent situation are risk factors for anyone who doesn’t train martial arts.

                        L This user is from outside of this forum
                        L This user is from outside of this forum
                        lost_faith
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #42

                        We will agree to disagree

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • A astralpath@lemmy.ca

                          I agree that they deserve what they get, but there needs to be some restriction to defense so that someone who has no intent on confrontation doesn’t get their fucking head blown off or smashed in.

                          You shouldn’t be able to just intentionally kill someone because they’re in your home, but if they don’t leave immediately, you should be able to royally fuck them up beyond belief until they decide to bail. If they’ve got a weapon and they don’t leave within 5 seconds of you catching them in the house, that’s a different story.

                          At that point it should be safe to argue that you were in mortal danger and exacted equal punishment to the invader that they intended to inflict on you. If they don’t leave immediately after being caught, they make a conscious choice to remain in the face of danger. The problem I see is that if someone carrying a weapon in your home is beaten and let go, there’s a chance they hold a grudge against you and come back to exact vengeance.

                          You shouldn’t have to move and abandon your home just because some fucking degenerate is butthurt about having their ass beat. If they leave without a fight, let them leave. If they stay while you’ve got a bat or a golf club in your hand, you should have full license to revoke their right to personal safety. This is just my opinion.

                          I love my wife more than anything and the thought of someone even threatening her by breaching into our home while she’s there would make it very difficult to remain sane in the moment. I think it would be foolish to treat that as anything other than a mortal threat.

                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          canconda@lemmy.ca
                          wrote on last edited by canconda@lemmy.ca
                          #43

                          Everyone here taking the rage-bait is clearly ignorant of the actual Canadian laws surrounding this.

                          1. Canadians have a legal right to defend themselves. Something not every country grants their citizens.

                          2. Several provincial trespass acts permit physical removal of trespassers.

                          So Canadians are well protected in confronting trespassers, so long as their actions are reasonable, IE conducive to removing the trespasser -or defending yourself.

                          Our laws work well. A fact that’s evidenced by our relatively peaceful society and the fact that stories like this (double charges) are a rarity.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L lost_faith

                            We will agree to disagree

                            C This user is from outside of this forum
                            C This user is from outside of this forum
                            canconda@lemmy.ca
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #44

                            I mean sounds to me like you’re conflating your experience with cops to how judges interpret the law; which is simply not true.

                            It’s not a matter of clashing opinions.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • L lost_faith

                              So, you must not let the adrenaline flow to help you out, got it. I am not a very large man (was an even smaller kid) compared to the average, I have been victimized many times. When I did win a fight in grade school, I almost chocked the kid out completely, he didn’t get up right away when I did finally come back to myself, after he hit me once I only saw black shapes in a red haze I had no idea what I had done. I got in shit, he who started it got to leave with no punishment. So yeah… sure

                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              jhex@lemmy.world
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #45

                              I only saw black shapes in a red haze I had no idea what I had done

                              and you want guns and castle doctrine like in Murica? glad this is not the case

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              6
                              • J jhex@lemmy.world

                                I only saw black shapes in a red haze I had no idea what I had done

                                and you want guns and castle doctrine like in Murica? glad this is not the case

                                L This user is from outside of this forum
                                L This user is from outside of this forum
                                lost_faith
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #46

                                Where did I say guns? If I had a gun I wouldn’t have been in the seeing red space, he woulda had a hole in him, one hole more than factory. I don’t own guns (for obvious reasons) and don’t want one personally, I like our gun laws, I don’t like our legal system as there is no justice for the wronged. If the intruder survives their idiocy then they should be punished. If you break into someone’s house you are a threat to their existence and should be dealt with accordingly, if they leave when confronted then they leave, if not they deserve everything they get until you regain control.

                                L J 2 Replies Last reply
                                2
                                • L lost_faith

                                  You break into a house, threaten the people inside, you get what you deserve. If they break your bones or end your life, THAT is the risk YOU take. Fuck this holding the VICTIM responsible. Not much I like from US law, but stand your ground and castle doctrine really ring true for me after being home invaded, robbed, and beaten by 3 invaders. What did the cops do? fuck all. Next fucker breaks intro my house will be dealing with trauma for the rest of their lives.

                                  edit: Thank you to all who up AND down voted, and engaged in conversation, I appreciate it, and it was cathartic. I won’t be responding to any more of this post as I have said all I will on this. Remember to not get too mad at dissenting opinions and try to have a great day.

                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  archangel1313@lemmy.ca
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #47

                                  So…someone else doing something bad, means you get a pass to do something even worse?

                                  “He tried to steal from me, so I get to murder him”?

                                  Does that really make sense to you?

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  7
                                  • A archangel1313@lemmy.ca

                                    So…someone else doing something bad, means you get a pass to do something even worse?

                                    “He tried to steal from me, so I get to murder him”?

                                    Does that really make sense to you?

                                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    lost_faith
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #48

                                    You break into a house, you have nefarious intentions. You made a choice to cause physical harm, you pay the price. The victim didn’t choose to be broken into, with a weapon to be used against them. The victim doesn’t know if that weapon is for intimidation or action.

                                    See, this is the problem, victim is held responsible then bleeding hearts feel bad for the aggressor when he gets what’s coming to them. In the moment, you don’t have hours to reflect on your actions and adrenaline is one HELL of a drug but yes, keep protecting the aggressors, when they do serve a small amount of time the bleeding hearts try to get them released even when the victims fear their release

                                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • L lost_faith

                                      Where did I say guns? If I had a gun I wouldn’t have been in the seeing red space, he woulda had a hole in him, one hole more than factory. I don’t own guns (for obvious reasons) and don’t want one personally, I like our gun laws, I don’t like our legal system as there is no justice for the wronged. If the intruder survives their idiocy then they should be punished. If you break into someone’s house you are a threat to their existence and should be dealt with accordingly, if they leave when confronted then they leave, if not they deserve everything they get until you regain control.

                                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                                      leftytighty@slrpnk.net
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #49

                                      I’m physically unable to control myself and don’t see anything wrong with that.

                                      Sounds like you should work on that before you end up hurting someone

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      4
                                      • C canconda@lemmy.ca

                                        Give homeowners the same benefit of the doubt

                                        Plenty of people defend themselves without getting charged. Guarantee this guy could have stopped but didn’t. That’s 99% of what constitutes unreasonable force.

                                        Everyone who thinks he was automatically charged for fighting back and winning is misinformed.

                                        Canadians have a legal right to defend themselves. But logically that doesn’t grant you the right to counter-assault or murder others.

                                        The fact that the RCMP are not releasing any details indicates they have a real case against this guy. For all we know he punched him out than laid the boots on his unconscious body.

                                        ikidd@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ikidd@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ikidd@lemmy.world
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #50

                                        If it weren’t for the fact the burglar got charge with a weapons offence, I’d be inclined to agree. That bar of “reasonable” should go pretty high when someone’s in your house with a weapon. Now who knows what it was, and maybe the homeowner did beat him after he wasn’t a threat anymore.

                                        I probably wouldn’t go around “guaranteeing” anything. I just hope the definition of reasonable matches the circumstances because there’s a reason people in Canada don’t think you have a right to self-defence, as they’ve recently updated the self-defence laws because of murkiness, and it’s still not clear.

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • L lost_faith

                                          Where did I say guns? If I had a gun I wouldn’t have been in the seeing red space, he woulda had a hole in him, one hole more than factory. I don’t own guns (for obvious reasons) and don’t want one personally, I like our gun laws, I don’t like our legal system as there is no justice for the wronged. If the intruder survives their idiocy then they should be punished. If you break into someone’s house you are a threat to their existence and should be dealt with accordingly, if they leave when confronted then they leave, if not they deserve everything they get until you regain control.

                                          J This user is from outside of this forum
                                          J This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jhex@lemmy.world
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #51

                                          If I had a gun I wouldn’t have been in the seeing red space, he woulda had a hole in him

                                          this is the kind of asshole that shoots kids on halloween for kncking on the wrong door

                                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                                          4

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post