Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. TechTakes
  3. Only 3%* of US AI users are willing to pay a penny for it

Only 3%* of US AI users are willing to pay a penny for it

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved TechTakes
10 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • David GerardD This user is from outside of this forum
    David GerardD This user is from outside of this forum
    David Gerard
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    podcast version
    video version

    kamenLady.K S 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • David GerardD David Gerard

      podcast version
      video version

      kamenLady.K This user is from outside of this forum
      kamenLady.K This user is from outside of this forum
      kamenLady.
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      they look forward to turning chatbots into a sea of spam:

      We expect rapid adoption of advertising models, transaction fees, affiliate revenue, and marketplace models.

      We’re doomed.

      In the last weeks Pinterest became unusable imo. The AI “sea of spam” is no joke. 7 in 10 posts are ads now. AI ads. Every one of them is a grotesque AI mimic of the content you’re viewing, all words meaningless gibberish. The things on the thumbnails suggest, but you can’t make things really out by just seeing the thumbnails.

      So i clicked them a few times too much. First by curiosity, then by mistake, because Pinterest does everything to make an ad look like a post.

      7 in 10 posts.

      After all these years successfully procrastinating with Pinterest, it has become a dopamine blocking experience.

      Eric LawtonE 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • kamenLady.K kamenLady.

        they look forward to turning chatbots into a sea of spam:

        We expect rapid adoption of advertising models, transaction fees, affiliate revenue, and marketplace models.

        We’re doomed.

        In the last weeks Pinterest became unusable imo. The AI “sea of spam” is no joke. 7 in 10 posts are ads now. AI ads. Every one of them is a grotesque AI mimic of the content you’re viewing, all words meaningless gibberish. The things on the thumbnails suggest, but you can’t make things really out by just seeing the thumbnails.

        So i clicked them a few times too much. First by curiosity, then by mistake, because Pinterest does everything to make an ad look like a post.

        7 in 10 posts.

        After all these years successfully procrastinating with Pinterest, it has become a dopamine blocking experience.

        Eric LawtonE This user is from outside of this forum
        Eric LawtonE This user is from outside of this forum
        Eric Lawton
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @kamenlady

        Meanwhile, we are losing our jobs to these slop generators, so all the extra advertising is in vain, because we won't be able to buy the products and services.

        @dgerard @cstross

        Charlie StrossC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Eric LawtonE Eric Lawton

          @kamenlady

          Meanwhile, we are losing our jobs to these slop generators, so all the extra advertising is in vain, because we won't be able to buy the products and services.

          @dgerard @cstross

          Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
          Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
          Charlie Stross
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @EricLawton @kamenlady @dgerard "Come witness the violence inherent in the system!"

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • David GerardD David Gerard

            podcast version
            video version

            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            I pay. Shits helping me with missing commas and reworking my passive wording… Which I do a lot…

            blakestacey@awful.systemsB 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works

              I pay. Shits helping me with missing commas and reworking my passive wording… Which I do a lot…

              blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
              blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
              blakestacey@awful.systems
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              Writing advisers have been condemning the English passive since the early 20th century. I provide an informal but comprehensive syntactic description of passive clauses in English, and then exhibit numerous published examples of incompetent criticism in which critics reveal that they cannot tell passives from actives. Some seem to confuse the grammatical concept with a rhetorical one involving inadequate attribution of agency or responsibility, but not all examples are thus explained. The specific stylistic charges leveled against the passive are entirely baseless.

              http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/passive_loathing.pdf

              v0ldek@awful.systemsV 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • blakestacey@awful.systemsB blakestacey@awful.systems

                Writing advisers have been condemning the English passive since the early 20th century. I provide an informal but comprehensive syntactic description of passive clauses in English, and then exhibit numerous published examples of incompetent criticism in which critics reveal that they cannot tell passives from actives. Some seem to confuse the grammatical concept with a rhetorical one involving inadequate attribution of agency or responsibility, but not all examples are thus explained. The specific stylistic charges leveled against the passive are entirely baseless.

                http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/passive_loathing.pdf

                v0ldek@awful.systemsV This user is from outside of this forum
                v0ldek@awful.systemsV This user is from outside of this forum
                v0ldek@awful.systems
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                Wait what, TIL there was/is a crusade against… the passive fucking voice?

                Some people just need to invent problems for their life to feel meaningful, don’t they

                Charlie StrossC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • v0ldek@awful.systemsV v0ldek@awful.systems

                  Wait what, TIL there was/is a crusade against… the passive fucking voice?

                  Some people just need to invent problems for their life to feel meaningful, don’t they

                  Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
                  Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
                  Charlie Stross
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @V0ldek This is a hill I will die on: the passive voice ABSOLUTELY does not belong in a work of fiction. (Academic papers and reports are another matter entirely, but fiction: no.)

                  v0ldek@awful.systemsV 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                    @V0ldek This is a hill I will die on: the passive voice ABSOLUTELY does not belong in a work of fiction. (Academic papers and reports are another matter entirely, but fiction: no.)

                    v0ldek@awful.systemsV This user is from outside of this forum
                    v0ldek@awful.systemsV This user is from outside of this forum
                    v0ldek@awful.systems
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    My immediate gut reaction to a rule as general as this is that there’s fat chance it’s universally applicable, there will always be cases where active would be clunky.

                    Like I can’t imagine an RPG protagonist exclaiming that “Someone trapped this chest!” instead of the 100% more natural “This chest was trapped!”

                    Charlie StrossC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • v0ldek@awful.systemsV v0ldek@awful.systems

                      My immediate gut reaction to a rule as general as this is that there’s fat chance it’s universally applicable, there will always be cases where active would be clunky.

                      Like I can’t imagine an RPG protagonist exclaiming that “Someone trapped this chest!” instead of the 100% more natural “This chest was trapped!”

                      Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
                      Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
                      Charlie Stross
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @V0ldek That's an RPG protagonist protagging. Not prose fiction. (This thought brought to you b/c I've lately been reading a multivolume LitRPG epic that I had to bail on midway through book 3 because the author dropped into passive voice with extreme clunkiness at random, infrequent intervals, making for a jarring read.)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post