Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Ontario city pauses speed cameras after 32K tickets handed out in 3 weeks

Ontario city pauses speed cameras after 32K tickets handed out in 3 weeks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
71 Posts 26 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S showroom7561@lemmy.ca

    I think the takeaway is that speed cameras won’t deter speeding

    That’s not true.

    Numerous cities report lower overall speeds, and a reduction in traffic collisions when automated cameras are deployed.

    For example, https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/annoying-thing-speed-cameras-ottawa-they-work-1.6786951 and https://www.sudbury.com/local-news/speed-cameras-proved-effective-at-latest-locations-10758040.

    When my city installed the first speed camera, it clocked over 100,000 speeders in 40 days. Unfortunately, we gave drivers a grace period, so no fines were issued at the beginning.

    But in those areas, speeding was reduced.

    I’d rather have roads designed to be slow and require attention to navigate, but good luck getting anyone to listen to that. Trying to get any speed reduction strategies to be implemented is very difficult because of NIMBYs.

    peppycito@sh.itjust.worksP This user is from outside of this forum
    peppycito@sh.itjust.worksP This user is from outside of this forum
    peppycito@sh.itjust.works
    wrote on last edited by peppycito@sh.itjust.works
    #39

    I guess I misspoke. I meant to say that they aren’t detering speeding yet.

    In my rural area they are putting 50km signs in the middle of the road on the yellow lines. Makes you feel like you’re threading a needle.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N-E-NN N-E-N

      Ticketing distracted pedestrians? What kinda garbage city do you wanna live in lmao

      Out of curiosity, what do you view as a well designed city that would be a good example of what you want to see more of

      B This user is from outside of this forum
      B This user is from outside of this forum
      brax@sh.itjust.works
      wrote on last edited by
      #40

      I walk as much as I drive. The people I see crossing the street while staring at their phone and/or wearing headphones is wild. As are the Leo who stand as close to the edge of the sidewalk as possible waiting for the light of to change, but you can’t do much there.

      You also get people crossing when the hand is up, which should also be a ticketable offense.

      Not a garbage city, a city with equal responsibility and accountability.

      If we’re going to push for lower speed limits then I want to see adequate crosswalks, and vehicles and pedestrians being equally fined for infractions.

      Neither activity is difficult business, yet we have a staggering amount of people driving who shouldn’t be, and pedestrians who are gonna end up in the hospital due to their own stupidity.

      N-E-NN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F fireretardant@lemmy.world

        Pedestrain safety becomes a concern at higher speeds. Collisons become more intense and more deadly as speed increases. The drivers are the problem, not the speed limit.

        If the cars aren’t able to reach the limit due to traffic, how did the cameras hand out so many speeding tickets?

        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        brax@sh.itjust.works
        wrote on last edited by
        #41

        I walk and drive frequently. Pedestrian safety is important, but we shouldn’t be coddling morons who can’t be safe pedestrians. What the fuck happened to looking both ways and nkt wearing headphones etc? Pedestrian safety has gone to the wayside and instead we’re going after drivers?

        When did these cameras catch the drivers? Was it during rush hour or was it at 3am when there was little traffic on the road in the first place? How much over the limit were these people doing? There’s an awful lot of important data missing here.

        And yes, the drivers are absolutely the problem yet we keep lowering the limits instead of pulling the shit drivers with 0 reflex and the reaction time of a potato off the road.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • G genevieve@lemmy.blahaj.zone

          At 30kph, a pedestrian hit by a car survives 90% of the time.

          At 50kph, it’s 50/50 if a pedestrian dies.

          At 70kph, it’s 90/10 dead body.

          As someone in that lucky 10%, I’m all for more enforcement of speed limits.

          B This user is from outside of this forum
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          brax@sh.itjust.works
          wrote on last edited by
          #42

          Great, so set the limits to 70kmh so pedestrians stop being so careless, or lower the limits and put more pedestrian crossings in place.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • V Victor Villas

            Not sure what exactly they’re expecting to have happen.

            Great opportunity to go inform yourself then 🙂

            B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            brax@sh.itjust.works
            wrote on last edited by
            #43

            Inform myself of what? The 10 year old crossing the empty street at 3am on a school night? Sure…

            If other cars would just fucking do the limit and not take years to get there, there would be far less speeding. I know I’m mostly doing it to make up for lost time from all the dumb fucks I’m stuck behind/beside because they can’t keep the fuck up with traffic

            F A 2 Replies Last reply
            2
            • N narrativebear@lemmy.world

              After more than 32,000 speeding tickets were handed out in just three weeks by new automated speed enforcement cameras in community safety zones, council in the City of Vaughan decided to pause the program.

              Mayor Steven Del Duca put forward the motion last week to pause the tickets until September, when council is due to receive a report from staff on ways the city can create more effective signage about the presence of cameras.

              Z This user is from outside of this forum
              Z This user is from outside of this forum
              zenith@lemm.ee
              wrote on last edited by zenith@lemm.ee
              #44

              Sounds like they were working as intended. In France they have speed cameras on the highway that average your speed over a distance and mail speeders tickets too, should be everywhere. Silly to stop such a wildly successful public safety campaign, if anything it’s clear this is a real problem and the program should be expanded. Why is signage needed? Follow the rules and don’t get a ticket is already a very well publicized concept, don’t speed and the cameras aren’t a problem

              1 Reply Last reply
              15
              • B brax@sh.itjust.works

                Inform myself of what? The 10 year old crossing the empty street at 3am on a school night? Sure…

                If other cars would just fucking do the limit and not take years to get there, there would be far less speeding. I know I’m mostly doing it to make up for lost time from all the dumb fucks I’m stuck behind/beside because they can’t keep the fuck up with traffic

                F This user is from outside of this forum
                F This user is from outside of this forum
                featherconstrictor@sh.itjust.works
                wrote on last edited by
                #45

                Aaand there it is. You’re a speeder and therefore a dangerous driver and refuse to take responsibility for the fact that you are making roadways more dangerous for yourself and everyone around you. You don’t see yourself as a bad person, so the fact that people like you could get punished for behaving in a way you think is fine and redeemabke makes you angry. You’re impatient and want to save a few minutes of “lost time” from traffic and believe the solution is to speed rather than leaving a few minutes earlier, advocating for traffic calming measures, fewer cards on the road, more effective roadways, effective public transportation etc. all of which would make it safer and easier for everyone, including yourself, to make it where they need to go on time.

                M B 2 Replies Last reply
                5
                • B brax@sh.itjust.works

                  Inform myself of what? The 10 year old crossing the empty street at 3am on a school night? Sure…

                  If other cars would just fucking do the limit and not take years to get there, there would be far less speeding. I know I’m mostly doing it to make up for lost time from all the dumb fucks I’m stuck behind/beside because they can’t keep the fuck up with traffic

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  anti_iridium@lemmy.world
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #46

                  Drive like a Christian Motorist

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • G genevieve@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                    At 30kph, a pedestrian hit by a car survives 90% of the time.

                    At 50kph, it’s 50/50 if a pedestrian dies.

                    At 70kph, it’s 90/10 dead body.

                    As someone in that lucky 10%, I’m all for more enforcement of speed limits.

                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    mpatch@lemmy.world
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #47

                    Wow fuck cars all roads should be 30kph

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • F featherconstrictor@sh.itjust.works

                      Aaand there it is. You’re a speeder and therefore a dangerous driver and refuse to take responsibility for the fact that you are making roadways more dangerous for yourself and everyone around you. You don’t see yourself as a bad person, so the fact that people like you could get punished for behaving in a way you think is fine and redeemabke makes you angry. You’re impatient and want to save a few minutes of “lost time” from traffic and believe the solution is to speed rather than leaving a few minutes earlier, advocating for traffic calming measures, fewer cards on the road, more effective roadways, effective public transportation etc. all of which would make it safer and easier for everyone, including yourself, to make it where they need to go on time.

                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      mpatch@lemmy.world
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #48

                      Road ways are designed with something like a safety factor where a 50kph road way Is safe up to 80kph. It’s just reduced for those stunned types of us.

                      F 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • U ulrich_the_old@lemmy.ca

                        Design the roads so that they are unpleasant to use above the speed you are trying to achieve. This method has had great success in the Netherlands.

                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        fireretardant@lemmy.world
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #49

                        But then we can’t just cut and paste the same lane design regardless if it is a school zone or a freeway.

                        A 1 Reply Last reply
                        6
                        • M mpatch@lemmy.world

                          Road ways are designed with something like a safety factor where a 50kph road way Is safe up to 80kph. It’s just reduced for those stunned types of us.

                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          fireretardant@lemmy.world
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #50

                          Designing a 50 zone to be safe at 80 is a big part of why our roads are dangerous and we need to address mass speeding. On a highway it make sense to give more wiggle room with speed, the same is not true for residential roads or school zones.

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • S showroom7561@lemmy.ca

                            Driving is a right privilage, not a privilege right.

                            Speed enforcement cameras (and red light cameras) are doing something that we don’t have the money to do via traffic officers.

                            Roads should be watched and laws enforced. Because people killing people with their vehicle shouldn’t be something we view as normal or acceptable, IMO.

                            Edit: fixed glaring mistake.

                            F This user is from outside of this forum
                            F This user is from outside of this forum
                            fireretardant@lemmy.world
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #51

                            Driving is not a right. Not everyone is entitled to it. Blind people, people under 16, people with certain health conditions, people who have had too many DUIs.

                            I agree with the rest of your comment but driving isn’t a right, we’ve just built a society where it feels like we have to treat it as a right to be fair.

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F fireretardant@lemmy.world

                              Designing a 50 zone to be safe at 80 is a big part of why our roads are dangerous and we need to address mass speeding. On a highway it make sense to give more wiggle room with speed, the same is not true for residential roads or school zones.

                              M This user is from outside of this forum
                              M This user is from outside of this forum
                              mpatch@lemmy.world
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #52

                              Try understanding. The road was already designed to be safe at 80kph. They lower it down to 50kph because of folks such as the ones who brake at the green light because the count down timer for the walk signal hit zero. Or the ones who don’t know where the fuck they are going, panick miss their turn and slam on the fucking brakes in the middle of a 3 lane road instead of pulling a u-turn 100m up the road. Then they try the bulshit of traffic calming shit by retiming the lights so every light in 10km stretch will be red when you get to it. Fucking phenomenal way to prevent irritation.

                              B 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F fireretardant@lemmy.world

                                Driving is not a right. Not everyone is entitled to it. Blind people, people under 16, people with certain health conditions, people who have had too many DUIs.

                                I agree with the rest of your comment but driving isn’t a right, we’ve just built a society where it feels like we have to treat it as a right to be fair.

                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                showroom7561@lemmy.ca
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #53

                                Doh, I got that reversed 🫣 Corrected now.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • peppycito@sh.itjust.worksP peppycito@sh.itjust.works

                                  I guess I misspoke. I meant to say that they aren’t detering speeding yet.

                                  In my rural area they are putting 50km signs in the middle of the road on the yellow lines. Makes you feel like you’re threading a needle.

                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  showroom7561@lemmy.ca
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #54

                                  In my rural area they are putting 50km signs in the middle of the road on the yellow lines. Makes you feel like you’re threading a needle.

                                  I like that idea!

                                  We have something similar in a few spots around here using flexible bollards.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B brax@sh.itjust.works

                                    I walk as much as I drive. The people I see crossing the street while staring at their phone and/or wearing headphones is wild. As are the Leo who stand as close to the edge of the sidewalk as possible waiting for the light of to change, but you can’t do much there.

                                    You also get people crossing when the hand is up, which should also be a ticketable offense.

                                    Not a garbage city, a city with equal responsibility and accountability.

                                    If we’re going to push for lower speed limits then I want to see adequate crosswalks, and vehicles and pedestrians being equally fined for infractions.

                                    Neither activity is difficult business, yet we have a staggering amount of people driving who shouldn’t be, and pedestrians who are gonna end up in the hospital due to their own stupidity.

                                    N-E-NN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    N-E-NN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    N-E-N
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #55

                                    So no example of a city that has successfully implemented all these ideas and was better for it?

                                    Because there’s lots of cities that have successfully done mostly the opposite and are better for it (Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Montreal, Paris, Bergen, Oulu, etc)

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • F fireretardant@lemmy.world

                                      But then we can’t just cut and paste the same lane design regardless if it is a school zone or a freeway.

                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
                                      wrote on last edited by apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
                                      #56

                                      Last year, I think it was on the War on Cars podcast, their guest was a disillusioned traffic engineer that called his entire field “a fraud discipline.” Like they put absolutely no critical thought into their designs as long as they are built to the exacting code.

                                      Edit: Found it, it was an episode from a few years ago.

                                      I was getting it mixed up with this other episode.

                                      F 1 Reply Last reply
                                      3
                                      • M mycatiskai@lemmy.ca

                                        Ding Ding Ding.

                                        If they had given council members a device to shut off the cameras for themselves and rich donors then they wouldn’t have shut it down.

                                        Maybe they should consider changing the speed limits a bit.

                                        Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Nik282000
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #57

                                        Maybe they should consider changing the speed limits a bit.

                                        Or, hear me out, people could make the needle on their dash point at the same number as the one printed on the giant white signs all over.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • F fireretardant@lemmy.world

                                          We need a mix of both. Yes people should be following the rules, but the truth is some people don’t and with how normalized driving is, testing standards are pretty relaxed. Most people were tested as teenagers and now just rely on getting tickets to keep us in line, meanwhile many trades and certificates require retesting to stay valid. It would be horrendously expensive to retest drivers, but i think regular retesting should be done and the bill should be paid for by the drivers.

                                          Currently it feels just as safe to do 80 in most 60 zones. Changing the design to make speeding feel more risky and feel unsafe will reduce speeding and let people rely less on their speedometers.

                                          My coworker doesn’t like to speed. His new van doesn’t have cruise control. The 10 speed automatic transmission can let you creep from 100 to 115/120 pretty easily and relatively unnoticeably on an empty road. He complains how half his time driving hes constantly checking the speedometer and feels he is paying less attention to the roadway because of that. This issue isn’t as simple as check the speedometer more often. Vehicle and roadway design plays a factor as well.

                                          H This user is from outside of this forum
                                          H This user is from outside of this forum
                                          healthetank@lemmy.ca
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #58

                                          For sure! One of those changes requires money and time, and one requires people to pay attention. Should be an easy choice which should get implemented now vs in 5-10yrs.

                                          I dislike the infantalization of the public, and the idea that people can’t be trusted, so we should make the roads such that they NEED to follow the limit feels stupid.

                                          now just rely on getting tickets to keep us in line, I mean if thats our system and there isn’t enough push to retest us regularly, then yeah, I’m not opposed to getting tickets. My city has installed them throughout our community safety zones, and I got dinged once at 8km.hr over. Sure, it sucks, but I was the one in the wrong. The idea of removing them, or me saying its the fault of the road design is ridiculous. I chose to go that speed, largely because we’ve been able to speed at 5-10km/hr over the speed limit with no consequences for my entire adult life. Now I see a community safety zone and I go the speed limit, regardless of where I am or what the road ‘feels’ like I can drive.

                                          The 10 speed automatic transmission can let you creep from 100 to 115/120 pretty easily and relatively unnoticeably on an empty road.

                                          If he’s on a highway, then learn what 100 feels like in your new car. It’s an adjustment. I work in road design, and the safety standards that are required when designing highways trump concerns over speeding. People are bad judges of what is a ‘safe’ speed, and building highways around how fast people feel comfortable going leads to more accidents and more dangerous accidents.

                                          That being said, I’m all for narrowing lanes, adding MUPs or widening sidewalks, all of which can occur at the same time. But the transportation master plan and/or asset management queue is built up for the next ~10 years (minimum), and updating or changing that is a very expensive process most places dont have the money for.

                                          From the article, New Westminster Drive was the highest (9,000+ tickets). The road was redone in 2015 (with no changes to the alignment or width). That means they’re likely looking at a minimum of 15+ years before they’ll rebuild the road, which is whats required to adjust curblines, narrow the road, or otherwise change the alignment. Likewise Ansley Grove Road was redone in 2010, and won’t be rebuilt for 10+years.

                                          Those roads are all four lane urban roads with few intersecting streets and long stretches for motorists to get up to speed. Speed enforcement is the simplest and fastest method to address the problem now. Sure, petition your local council to change what their standard road cross section is, but that won’t change anything for 15+ years. ___

                                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post