Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. The proposed Strong Borders Act gives police new invasive search powers that may breach Charter rights

The proposed Strong Borders Act gives police new invasive search powers that may breach Charter rights

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
4 Posts 4 Posters 16 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • OtterO This user is from outside of this forum
    OtterO This user is from outside of this forum
    Otter
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Author: Robert Diab | Professor, Faculty of Law, Thompson Rivers University

    Link Preview Image
    The proposed Strong Borders Act gives police new invasive search powers that may breach Charter rights

    The Canadian government’s proposed Strong Borders Act appears to be in response to calls for Canada to beef up its borders with the United States.

    favicon

    The Conversation (theconversation.com)

    G MythraS A 3 Replies Last reply
    53
    • OtterO Otter

      Author: Robert Diab | Professor, Faculty of Law, Thompson Rivers University

      Link Preview Image
      The proposed Strong Borders Act gives police new invasive search powers that may breach Charter rights

      The Canadian government’s proposed Strong Borders Act appears to be in response to calls for Canada to beef up its borders with the United States.

      favicon

      The Conversation (theconversation.com)

      G This user is from outside of this forum
      G This user is from outside of this forum
      grey_maniac@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Who actually wrote this bill? Was this some lobby/thinktank/special interest group that fed it through to the government? I’m getting tired of not knowing who’s behind all this crap, and it keeps having a similar smell.

      1 Reply Last reply
      15
      • OtterO Otter

        Author: Robert Diab | Professor, Faculty of Law, Thompson Rivers University

        Link Preview Image
        The proposed Strong Borders Act gives police new invasive search powers that may breach Charter rights

        The Canadian government’s proposed Strong Borders Act appears to be in response to calls for Canada to beef up its borders with the United States.

        favicon

        The Conversation (theconversation.com)

        MythraS This user is from outside of this forum
        MythraS This user is from outside of this forum
        Mythra
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        This is what we get from “strategic voting”. Scrap the system, start over. Decolonize your minds.

        1 Reply Last reply
        6
        • OtterO Otter

          Author: Robert Diab | Professor, Faculty of Law, Thompson Rivers University

          Link Preview Image
          The proposed Strong Borders Act gives police new invasive search powers that may breach Charter rights

          The Canadian government’s proposed Strong Borders Act appears to be in response to calls for Canada to beef up its borders with the United States.

          favicon

          The Conversation (theconversation.com)

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          archangel1313@lemmy.ca
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          For all the alarmists acting like this is going to pass…it won’t. This is part of the normal process that all new legislation goes through. Politicians propse a bill, which contains everything they can think to include…throwing it all at the wall, just to see what will stick. Then it gets torn to shreds during the debate session, by legal advocacy groups and human rights organizations, who know exactly what kinds of legal challenges they can see coming a mile away. Anything that’s garaunteed to get tossed out in court is discarded from the legislation.

          Why? Because there’s no point in passing legislation that can’t actually be legally enforced. Law enforcement has been trying to get these kinds of “tools” implemented for decades. And the courts have all said, all the way along…no. You need a warrant for that kind of intrusion. They need probable cause to look at these things. They need a reasonable justification beyond, “I want to look, just in case”. None of the shit in this bill is going to pass the legal smell test. Period.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1

          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post