If oil giants are reluctant to invest in carbon capture, why should taxpayers?
-
This post did not contain any content.
If oil giants are reluctant to invest in carbon capture, why should taxpayers?
The fact that oil companies are reluctant to invest in their own giant carbon reduction projects speaks volumes about how they view their longevity. If anyone understands the economics of peak oil, it’s them.
Canada's National Observer (www.nationalobserver.com)
-
This post did not contain any content.
If oil giants are reluctant to invest in carbon capture, why should taxpayers?
The fact that oil companies are reluctant to invest in their own giant carbon reduction projects speaks volumes about how they view their longevity. If anyone understands the economics of peak oil, it’s them.
Canada's National Observer (www.nationalobserver.com)
This is why natural resources should be nationalized. Corporations don’t care about anything but profit. And look where that jas gotten us? An envioent on the verge of collapse, all so a few people can live large…
-
This post did not contain any content.
If oil giants are reluctant to invest in carbon capture, why should taxpayers?
The fact that oil companies are reluctant to invest in their own giant carbon reduction projects speaks volumes about how they view their longevity. If anyone understands the economics of peak oil, it’s them.
Canada's National Observer (www.nationalobserver.com)
Corporations are reluctant because Carbon Capture is a fucking joke. It’s a dog and pony show, and a ridiculous pollution solution.
-
This is why natural resources should be nationalized. Corporations don’t care about anything but profit. And look where that jas gotten us? An envioent on the verge of collapse, all so a few people can live large…
Where that got us was a pretty high standard of living, remember when you could buy houses in Palm Springs for 200k? Then we took it for granted and began introducing capital flight.
