Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. The Liberals promised to strengthen the CBC. Now They’re Cutting It.

The Liberals promised to strengthen the CBC. Now They’re Cutting It.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
11 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mintiefreshM mintiefresh
    This post did not contain any content.
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    alexc@lemmy.world
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    I feel for the CBC - We all know they are underfunded, but a comparison with the BBC is a little unfair. That is funded mostly by the license fee. No one in Canada will pay that on top of cable fees, but I guess that’s part of the corporate freebie to Bell/Rogers/et al.

    The only beef I have with the article is that the CBC really isn’t any of these things the article cites. It’s news coverage is poor at best and it’s original programming is lacklustre. We do not need any more adaptations of Anne of Green Gables and nor do we need any more hokey Sitcoms (though I did like North of North)

    As a taxpayer, I really do want CBC to succeed. I just don’t how it can in todays media landscape.

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • A alexc@lemmy.world

      I feel for the CBC - We all know they are underfunded, but a comparison with the BBC is a little unfair. That is funded mostly by the license fee. No one in Canada will pay that on top of cable fees, but I guess that’s part of the corporate freebie to Bell/Rogers/et al.

      The only beef I have with the article is that the CBC really isn’t any of these things the article cites. It’s news coverage is poor at best and it’s original programming is lacklustre. We do not need any more adaptations of Anne of Green Gables and nor do we need any more hokey Sitcoms (though I did like North of North)

      As a taxpayer, I really do want CBC to succeed. I just don’t how it can in todays media landscape.

      B This user is from outside of this forum
      B This user is from outside of this forum
      bcsven@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      With more funding they might attract writers and producers of quality content

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      6
      • B bcsven@lemmy.ca

        With more funding they might attract writers and producers of quality content

        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        sbv@sh.itjust.works
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        There needs to be an internal will and ability to create shows that viewers/listeners enjoy. I’m not sure that exists. If we saw enjoyable shows getting by on a shoestring budget, then your statement would clearly be correct. But I don’t see that.

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • mintiefreshM mintiefresh
          This post did not contain any content.
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          sbv@sh.itjust.works
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          We should be investing in journalism that serves the public interest, not slashing its funding. We should be expanding access to local news, not pulling the plug. And we should expect our elected leaders to keep their promises, especially when it comes to protecting the foundations of our democracy.

          Didn’t the Liberals direct CBC to open more local offices and improve regional reporting?

          Value SubtractedV 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • mintiefreshM mintiefresh
            This post did not contain any content.
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            canconda@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by canconda@lemmy.ca
            #6

            The crux of this issue is there’s more money available to push agendas and misinformation than there is market cap for authentic journalism. We need to free information and journalism from the clutches of capitalism -at least partially.

            IMO a publicly funded entity like the CBC should provide infrastructure for independent journalism. They should be tasked with fostering a national association of qualified journalists, a logistical system to facilitate on-the-scene documentation, and platforming individually produced journalism. It would synergize with independent media that’s largely relegated to youtube and social media.

            1 Reply Last reply
            10
            • mintiefreshM mintiefresh
              This post did not contain any content.
              C This user is from outside of this forum
              C This user is from outside of this forum
              cyborganism
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              And Carney’s government deceives yet again. Keeping up with the conservatives’ plans.

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • S sbv@sh.itjust.works

                We should be investing in journalism that serves the public interest, not slashing its funding. We should be expanding access to local news, not pulling the plug. And we should expect our elected leaders to keep their promises, especially when it comes to protecting the foundations of our democracy.

                Didn’t the Liberals direct CBC to open more local offices and improve regional reporting?

                Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
                Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
                Value Subtracted
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                I don’t remember reading anything about them being “directed” to do so by the government, and even if that’s the case, that was last year, well before the election.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mintiefreshM mintiefresh
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                  jason2357@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by jason2357@lemmy.ca
                  #9

                  Obviously a concern, but this substack leaves out details:

                  Bouchard’s memo said the savings will be separate from the federal government’s commitment during the spring election campaign to invest an additional $150 million in CBC/Radio-Canada.

                  and

                  “However, it is important to remember that at this point we have been asked to develop proposals only. All of the proposals will be assessed by the government and final decisions reflected in the Main Estimates for 2026-2027

                  This proposal isn’t to cut CBC’s overall budget yet. On it’s face, they are looking for individual initiatives to save money, while promising to increase overall spending. That would be a perfectly fine objective to improve effectiveness and efficiency. Just watch for those annual budgets.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  17
                  • C cyborganism

                    And Carney’s government deceives yet again. Keeping up with the conservatives’ plans.

                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                    teppa
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Except all the savings go to bringing in elderly people for family reunification.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S sbv@sh.itjust.works

                      There needs to be an internal will and ability to create shows that viewers/listeners enjoy. I’m not sure that exists. If we saw enjoyable shows getting by on a shoestring budget, then your statement would clearly be correct. But I don’t see that.

                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      bcsven@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Depends what you enjoy I guess. I liked Schitts Creek, 22/minutes, there have been other older classics.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post