Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Trump Declares End Of Pride Month Recognition — And Canada Is Watching Closely

Trump Declares End Of Pride Month Recognition — And Canada Is Watching Closely

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
39 Posts 27 Posters 284 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • W wise_pancake@lemmy.ca

    Your daily reminder that trans rights are human rights. Gay rights are human rights. Any government trying to roll these back is only rolling back rights for all of us to be who we are.

    Supporting trans people is not taking away from women, these things aren’t zero sum.

    T This user is from outside of this forum
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    toastmeister@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by toastmeister@lemmy.ca
    #11

    Trans men gain the ability to compete with biological women, while biological women would be forced to compete with biological men. Is that not the definition of zero sum?

    magic@lemmy.caM fidel_cashflow@lemmy.mlF W D Jerkface (any/all)J 5 Replies Last reply
    1
    • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

      Trans men gain the ability to compete with biological women, while biological women would be forced to compete with biological men. Is that not the definition of zero sum?

      magic@lemmy.caM This user is from outside of this forum
      magic@lemmy.caM This user is from outside of this forum
      magic@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Out of curiosity, what is with peoples usage of sports as some magnificent example of why trans rights shouldn’t be allowed to exist?

      Speaking as a nonbinary person, I don’t care about sports. I genuinely have no interest in it. Why am I not allowed to exist comfortably just because someone old fart in another country got mad their sports team lost? Like, oh noooo, our existence is spoiling your beer and fun times with the bros. Who cares.

      T T 2 Replies Last reply
      16
      • magic@lemmy.caM magic@lemmy.ca

        Out of curiosity, what is with peoples usage of sports as some magnificent example of why trans rights shouldn’t be allowed to exist?

        Speaking as a nonbinary person, I don’t care about sports. I genuinely have no interest in it. Why am I not allowed to exist comfortably just because someone old fart in another country got mad their sports team lost? Like, oh noooo, our existence is spoiling your beer and fun times with the bros. Who cares.

        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        toastmeister@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by toastmeister@lemmy.ca
        #13

        Well sure, if you want to talk about public change room instead, then it would be the safe space provided. You’re obviously thinking of yourself as a non-threatening actor, but can you say that nobody will abuse the ability to use the ladies change room?

        Assume someone on the other side of this simply wants safe zones for women that are safe from the other gender, what would you tell that person as to why it needs to be eliminated?

        W P lime!L O 4 Replies Last reply
        0
        • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

          Trans men gain the ability to compete with biological women, while biological women would be forced to compete with biological men. Is that not the definition of zero sum?

          fidel_cashflow@lemmy.mlF This user is from outside of this forum
          fidel_cashflow@lemmy.mlF This user is from outside of this forum
          fidel_cashflow@lemmy.ml
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

            Trans men gain the ability to compete with biological women, while biological women would be forced to compete with biological men. Is that not the definition of zero sum?

            W This user is from outside of this forum
            W This user is from outside of this forum
            wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Sports is the only ring where it kinda makes sense to have separate leagues, but how much of an issue is this actually?

            There’s no way it’s worth the rhetoric and actions people have been taking.

            T L A 3 Replies Last reply
            25
            • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

              Well sure, if you want to talk about public change room instead, then it would be the safe space provided. You’re obviously thinking of yourself as a non-threatening actor, but can you say that nobody will abuse the ability to use the ladies change room?

              Assume someone on the other side of this simply wants safe zones for women that are safe from the other gender, what would you tell that person as to why it needs to be eliminated?

              W This user is from outside of this forum
              W This user is from outside of this forum
              wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              It feels like an incredibly large amount of work, and we don’t really see gay people and lesbians making an issue out of change rooms.

              1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

                Well sure, if you want to talk about public change room instead, then it would be the safe space provided. You’re obviously thinking of yourself as a non-threatening actor, but can you say that nobody will abuse the ability to use the ladies change room?

                Assume someone on the other side of this simply wants safe zones for women that are safe from the other gender, what would you tell that person as to why it needs to be eliminated?

                P This user is from outside of this forum
                P This user is from outside of this forum
                pauce@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                On the basis that one person may or may not abuse the situation all trans people deserve to be accused and/or treated as second class citizens? There are current real world incidences of cisgender women getting harrased and assaulted in these very “safe zones” under the guise of protecting cisgender women.

                The exclusion of trans women from these spaces creates a culture where some people are on the lookout for those who “don’t belong”, and this is leading to women who don’t fit visual/societal definitions of feminity and womanhood to getting singled out and harrased in these very spaces.

                Trans women are not “the other gender” as you put it, they are women; trans men are men. Bad actors who want to assault women or vulnerable people will do that any way they see fit, their gender identity is irrelevant. Being inclusive to trans people does not eliminate safe spaces, they are also deserving of being protected.

                1 Reply Last reply
                4
                • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

                  Well sure, if you want to talk about public change room instead, then it would be the safe space provided. You’re obviously thinking of yourself as a non-threatening actor, but can you say that nobody will abuse the ability to use the ladies change room?

                  Assume someone on the other side of this simply wants safe zones for women that are safe from the other gender, what would you tell that person as to why it needs to be eliminated?

                  lime!L This user is from outside of this forum
                  lime!L This user is from outside of this forum
                  lime!
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  let’s talk about public roads. you obviously think of yourself as a non-threatening driver, but can you say that nobody will abuse the ability to go 95 through a red light? better limit all cars to 30.

                  the argument you are using is treating an entire group of people like they are criminals just by existing. innocent until proven guilty.

                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                  9
                  • lime!L lime!

                    let’s talk about public roads. you obviously think of yourself as a non-threatening driver, but can you say that nobody will abuse the ability to go 95 through a red light? better limit all cars to 30.

                    the argument you are using is treating an entire group of people like they are criminals just by existing. innocent until proven guilty.

                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                    toastmeister@lemmy.ca
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Yes you’re right. Would your ideal scenario then be we want everyone to be able to self identify as anything they want, or that we have no barriers to begin with?

                    N 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • W wise_pancake@lemmy.ca

                      Sports is the only ring where it kinda makes sense to have separate leagues, but how much of an issue is this actually?

                      There’s no way it’s worth the rhetoric and actions people have been taking.

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      toastmeister@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by toastmeister@lemmy.ca
                      #20

                      Some people assume nefarious individuals would go into ladies change rooms, washrooms, or prisons.

                      O B 2 Replies Last reply
                      3
                      • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

                        Yes you’re right. Would your ideal scenario then be we want everyone to be able to self identify as anything they want, or that we have no barriers to begin with?

                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                        nopper@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        Why would anyone have an issue what other people self-identify as? My name is Todd, but I’d like you to call me Steve. Does this impact your day?

                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        4
                        • Cows Look Like MapsC Cows Look Like Maps

                          What Canadians can do

                          We don’t control U.S. policy, but we do control our response.

                          • Speak up: When Pride visibility is under attack—even elsewhere—we need to be louder in our solidarity. Local businesses, schools, and governments should reaffirm their support explicitly.

                          • Support queer media and organizations: From Rainbow Railroad to The 519, Canadian orgs are doing frontline work that often fills in the gaps left by political inaction.

                          • Challenge imported rhetoric: Whether it’s book bans or “parental rights” bills, we must recognize when American talking points show up in Canadian debates—and push back accordingly.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Trump Declares End Of Pride Month Recognition — And Canada Is Watching Closely - IN Magazine

                          Donald Trump ditches Pride Month for Title IX Month. Why it matters for Canada—and how U.S. culture wars keep crossing our borders.

                          favicon

                          IN Magazine (inmagazine.ca)

                          Match!!M This user is from outside of this forum
                          Match!!M This user is from outside of this forum
                          Match!!
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          we had pride way before we had legal recognition for pride

                          Jerkface (any/all)J 1 Reply Last reply
                          28
                          • H HubertManne

                            What does that even mean. I don’t think it was ever made a public holiday. Might as well declare an end to saint patricks day for all it will do.

                            Match!!M This user is from outside of this forum
                            Match!!M This user is from outside of this forum
                            Match!!
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            next up, mandatory Columbus day

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N nopper@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                              Why would anyone have an issue what other people self-identify as? My name is Todd, but I’d like you to call me Steve. Does this impact your day?

                              T This user is from outside of this forum
                              T This user is from outside of this forum
                              toastmeister@lemmy.ca
                              wrote on last edited by toastmeister@lemmy.ca
                              #24

                              No it doesn’t, just curious. I could see a scenario where they want no segregation based on sex/gender/race/age/etc… since anyone can identify as they want.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

                                Some people assume nefarious individuals would go into ladies change rooms, washrooms, or prisons.

                                O This user is from outside of this forum
                                O This user is from outside of this forum
                                outlierblue@lemmy.ca
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                Nefarious people would do that regardless, if they chose.

                                M 1 Reply Last reply
                                16
                                • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

                                  Well sure, if you want to talk about public change room instead, then it would be the safe space provided. You’re obviously thinking of yourself as a non-threatening actor, but can you say that nobody will abuse the ability to use the ladies change room?

                                  Assume someone on the other side of this simply wants safe zones for women that are safe from the other gender, what would you tell that person as to why it needs to be eliminated?

                                  O This user is from outside of this forum
                                  O This user is from outside of this forum
                                  outlierblue@lemmy.ca
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  So to stop the possibility that someone would sneak into a different bathroom to peek at someone’s genitals, you suggest we have people checking peoples genitals to even enter the room?

                                  That takes a hypothetical problem and guarantees it.

                                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • magic@lemmy.caM magic@lemmy.ca

                                    Out of curiosity, what is with peoples usage of sports as some magnificent example of why trans rights shouldn’t be allowed to exist?

                                    Speaking as a nonbinary person, I don’t care about sports. I genuinely have no interest in it. Why am I not allowed to exist comfortably just because someone old fart in another country got mad their sports team lost? Like, oh noooo, our existence is spoiling your beer and fun times with the bros. Who cares.

                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    taleya@aussie.zone
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    It lets them reinforce the idea that “mens better than wimmens at sports” as well.

                                    The whole thing is about reinforcing gender roles and views. Notice how they never go after transmen? Dudes may as well not even exist. It’s all about the transwomen and the potentiality to not look or act like their ideal of a woman. Must be stamped out!!!

                                    Every fucking attempt to police transwomen in toilets has done nothing but harass cis women. There’s a reason for that

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • O outlierblue@lemmy.ca

                                      So to stop the possibility that someone would sneak into a different bathroom to peek at someone’s genitals, you suggest we have people checking peoples genitals to even enter the room?

                                      That takes a hypothetical problem and guarantees it.

                                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                                      toastmeister@lemmy.ca
                                      wrote on last edited by toastmeister@lemmy.ca
                                      #28

                                      I hate to laugh but you are right, that does seem to be happening. I just cant rationalize an answer that appeases everyone.

                                      I just also feel that both side seems to be strawman’ing the other, so a discussion seems somewhat ridiculous every single time with no one agreeing on anything.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

                                        Some people assume nefarious individuals would go into ladies change rooms, washrooms, or prisons.

                                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        bcsven@lemmy.ca
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        It does happen, like we had a trans woman in BC (40s maybe) going into women’s washrooms and talking to teen girls, and asking them about their periods, but I seriosly doubt this is the normal behaviour of 99% of trans persons; it is the behaviour of a creep, wanting to talk inappropriately with teens.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

                                          Trans men gain the ability to compete with biological women, while biological women would be forced to compete with biological men. Is that not the definition of zero sum?

                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          derisionconsulting@lemmy.ca
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #30
                                          1. Trans men get the ability to compete with other men, I assume you mean trans women get to compete with other women.
                                          2. No one actually cares about women’s sports until “the trans issue” comes up. This argument is just an excuse to try to harm trans people. Most people can’t name a WNBA team, or name more than 5 female athletes.
                                          3. Biological differences is what professional sports are. That’s why people who have similar builds seem to play the same sports.
                                          F 1 Reply Last reply
                                          8

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post