Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. U.S. slaps 20.56% anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood lumber

U.S. slaps 20.56% anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood lumber

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
7 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SunshineS This user is from outside of this forum
    SunshineS This user is from outside of this forum
    Sunshine
    wrote last edited by
    #1
    This post did not contain any content.
    driftinglynx@lemmy.caD C Z K 4 Replies Last reply
    55
    • SunshineS Sunshine
      This post did not contain any content.
      driftinglynx@lemmy.caD This user is from outside of this forum
      driftinglynx@lemmy.caD This user is from outside of this forum
      driftinglynx@lemmy.ca
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      …if the industry could get production levels back to historic levels, it could help keep forestry-dependent communities vibrant into the future.

      The entire industry is in decline because of over harvesting in the past. This is just wishful thinking, lol.

      If the BC gov’t wanted to save small communities that rely on logging there’s an excellent report written at the NDP’s behest on just how to do that. However those reccomendations would mean less profit for the large corporations hell bent on clearcutting every last tree and packing up their mills and killing towns.

      So naturally this report and it’s reccomendations have been completely ignored.

      Tarrifs have never been the problem.

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      31
      • driftinglynx@lemmy.caD driftinglynx@lemmy.ca

        …if the industry could get production levels back to historic levels, it could help keep forestry-dependent communities vibrant into the future.

        The entire industry is in decline because of over harvesting in the past. This is just wishful thinking, lol.

        If the BC gov’t wanted to save small communities that rely on logging there’s an excellent report written at the NDP’s behest on just how to do that. However those reccomendations would mean less profit for the large corporations hell bent on clearcutting every last tree and packing up their mills and killing towns.

        So naturally this report and it’s reccomendations have been completely ignored.

        Tarrifs have never been the problem.

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        medic8teme@lemmy.ca
        wrote last edited by medic8teme@lemmy.ca
        #3

        It would also be a massive hit to BCTS. The BC government agency that controls softwood harvesting and in turn provides income to the provincial government. Softwood and processing machinery being one of the major exports in BC that funds the government for decades now.

        Probably has something to do with no reform.

        1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • SunshineS Sunshine
          This post did not contain any content.
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          canadaplus@lemmy.sdf.org
          wrote last edited by canadaplus@lemmy.sdf.org
          #4

          Trump seems to have a maximum resolution of 5%, so I wonder who came up with this number.

          N 1 Reply Last reply
          13
          • C canadaplus@lemmy.sdf.org

            Trump seems to have a maximum resolution of 5%, so I wonder who came up with this number.

            N This user is from outside of this forum
            N This user is from outside of this forum
            nyan@lemmy.cafe
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Whichever LLM whose owner hasn’t offended Trump this month.

            1 Reply Last reply
            6
            • SunshineS Sunshine
              This post did not contain any content.
              Z This user is from outside of this forum
              Z This user is from outside of this forum
              zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              How much is a slap in respect to a slam?

              1 Reply Last reply
              8
              • SunshineS Sunshine
                This post did not contain any content.
                K This user is from outside of this forum
                K This user is from outside of this forum
                kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                wrote last edited by kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                #7

                yawn, this again?

                Didn’t Canada win every single trade tribunal challenge on this exact same baseless complaint in the past?

                1 Reply Last reply
                5

                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Login or register to search.
                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post