Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Inuit leader says he's been reassured Bill C-5 won't violate modern treaties

Inuit leader says he's been reassured Bill C-5 won't violate modern treaties

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D This user is from outside of this forum
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    davriellelouna@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by davriellelouna@lemmy.world
    #1
    This post did not contain any content.
    Link Preview Image
    Inuit leader says he's been reassured Bill C-5 won't violate modern treaties | CBC News

    The president of the group representing Inuit in Canada says he's been given reassurances that Prime Minister Mark Carney's plan to fast-track major nation-building projects won't violate modern treaties and there will be "full partnership of the Inuit within these processes."

    favicon

    CBC (www.cbc.ca)

    E 1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • D davriellelouna@lemmy.world
      This post did not contain any content.
      Link Preview Image
      Inuit leader says he's been reassured Bill C-5 won't violate modern treaties | CBC News

      The president of the group representing Inuit in Canada says he's been given reassurances that Prime Minister Mark Carney's plan to fast-track major nation-building projects won't violate modern treaties and there will be "full partnership of the Inuit within these processes."

      favicon

      CBC (www.cbc.ca)

      E This user is from outside of this forum
      E This user is from outside of this forum
      enkers
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Cool, so if it’ll be fine with them anyways, why not give them a veto.

      When asked whether land claim organizations have a veto, Obed said provisions in their agreements “could be defined as vetoes, but really we see them as enabling.”

      Is that a weasel I smell?

      could be defined as vetoes

      Is it an actual veto, or is it not?

      1 Reply Last reply
      6

      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Login or register to search.
      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      • First post
        Last post