Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Guaranteed basic income bill re-tabled in the Senate

Guaranteed basic income bill re-tabled in the Senate

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
24 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B bravemonkey@lemmy.ca

    That’s a bad take, there will always be people who will say we can never afford it. The real question should be ‘can we afford not to’ as people live and die in miserable conditions.

    O This user is from outside of this forum
    O This user is from outside of this forum
    opi@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Well jeez. I wasn’t saying I’m against it. I’d love to see it happen.

    I don’t know of any success stories of it working at scale. I mean, countries using it at scale. Not cities or provinces. I was a part of the short lived pilot program in Ontario before it was axed. Axing it completely fucked me over. It worked. It worked great. I was about to invest in starting a business.

    But you know exactly what the opposition will say, right? “How can we afford it?”. Even Trudeau said he saw no path to it. So really, I was just echoing what was already said, sure - but if it keeps getting cancelled then the public will have a sour taste.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • O opi@lemmy.ca

      Can we afford it right now is the question. I’m not against it by any means, though.

      Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
      Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
      Nik282000
      wrote on last edited by
      #16

      🤡 gotta save all our taxes to subsidize oil and gas!

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • I initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com

        Yes. These programs literally produce more money than they consume. The effects of poverty are more expensive than fighting poverty.

        O This user is from outside of this forum
        O This user is from outside of this forum
        opi@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #17

        These programs literally produce more money than they consume

        Is there research you can provide to back that up?

        Again, I’m all for it. But being devil’s advocate here, I just want some evidence.

        I 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • O opi@lemmy.ca

          These programs literally produce more money than they consume

          Is there research you can provide to back that up?

          Again, I’m all for it. But being devil’s advocate here, I just want some evidence.

          I This user is from outside of this forum
          I This user is from outside of this forum
          initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          wrote on last edited by initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          #18

          Simulations of Canadian UBI programs could lead to a 5-year cumulative increase of $46 billion in government revenue and $178 billion in GDP without initial debt funding, or as much as $109 billion in government revenue and $419 billion in GDP if the program is initially 50% funded by government debt (this debt funding would be reduced over time)

          Link Preview Image
          Potential Economic Impacts and Reach of Basic Income Programs - Canadian Centre for Economic Analysis

          Interest in basic income has increased in recent years and the COVID-19 pandemic has pushed the idea of a guaranteed minimum income for Canadians into the national spotlight. Canada already has a modest basic income program in place for people with children—the Canada Child Benefit—whose economic contributions CANCEA has previously examined. This report examines the … Potential Economic Impacts and Reach of Basic Income Programs Read More »

          favicon

          Canadian Centre for Economic Analysis (www.cancea.ca)

          As a health economist, you become aware very quickly that we use the healthcare system to treat the consequences of poverty, and we do it in an inefficient and expensive way,” she says. “We wait until people live horrible lives for many years, get sick as a consequence, and then we go in all guns blazing to make things better.”

          After several years of painstaking work, she was finally able to publish the results, many of which were eye-opening. In particular, Forget was struck by the improvements in health outcomes over the four years. There was an 8.5% decline in hospitalisations – primarily because there were fewer alcohol-related accidents and hospitalisations due to mental health issues – and a reduction in visits to family physicians.

          Link Preview Image
          Canada’s forgotten universal basic income experiment

          Amid wide unemployment during Covid-19, basic income schemes have gained fresh relevance. A successful Canadian scheme that's over four decades old could provide a road map for others.

          favicon

          (www.bbc.com)

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • BeBopALouieB BeBopALouie

            Well that surely won’t happen in Ontario with the fascist narcissistic Ford running things. He is a soulless excuse for a human being for what he is doing to thousand of young/adult disabled people. It is a page right out of the fascist handbook.

            Ford has literally gutted ODSP and his abhorrent handling of the Ontario Autism Program (OAP) is disgraceful and hurtful. They combined Ontario works and ODSP. One noticed immediately a difference. The workers treated ODSP recipients like they were Ontario works recipients. They sent out job search forms, etc. to people that were permanently disabled and incapable of working and humiliating them (ask most disabled people, they will say one of their dreams is to actually go out and work so to have these forms sent to them is literally a slap in the face) because these workers were never trained on how to deal with the disabled only people that were unemployed.

            We can no longer email our local ODSP office, no more one on one workers, you are tossed into a pool and they rarely call back if ever. We had to actually get a lawyer involved just to contact the ODSP office to get anything done after 6 months of us calling with no call back in that 6 months.

            Things ODSP used to cover, gone. Our child has autism and epilepsy. He has never ever had any form official therapy, guidance of any kind due to Doug Ford and gang. We were “approved” for OAP and SSAH almost 3 years ago but are still on the waiting list to actually get funding.

            Our case is not unique, there are literally 1000’s of Autistic kids/adults that are not getting ANY therapy that they need to exist and communicate in society. This will lead to more violent altercations with police due to limited communication skills due to lack of therapy and more hospital visits plus more that will by carried by taxpayers down the road for years if not decades. Guess Ford does not care about down the road while he and his gang fill their pockets. We are very grateful for all that we receive. We do not expect anything. The Ford government promised OAP, SSAH and more but have not held true to that promise. Doug Ford is fully responsible for not helping thousands of his fellow Canadians that are disabled kids and adults and leaving them in the lurch.

            ikidd@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
            ikidd@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
            ikidd@lemmy.world
            wrote on last edited by
            #19

            Good Lord you need to learn formatting.

            BeBopALouieB 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ikidd@lemmy.worldI ikidd@lemmy.world

              Good Lord you need to learn formatting.

              BeBopALouieB This user is from outside of this forum
              BeBopALouieB This user is from outside of this forum
              BeBopALouie
              wrote on last edited by
              #20

              Ya I do.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • FaceDeerF FaceDeer

                If they had that sort of lobbying power I doubt we’d see UBI to begin with. Regardless, “evil people might thwart it!” Is not a very good reason not to try to do good things.

                K This user is from outside of this forum
                K This user is from outside of this forum
                kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by
                #21

                Regardless, “evil people might thwart it!” Is not a very good reason not to try to do good things.

                It wasn’t my intention to suggest that we shouldn’t try it.

                I was merely (and cynically) pointing out the forces who will be pushing against the efforts to do some good for society.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • BeBopALouieB BeBopALouie

                  Link Preview Image
                  Guaranteed basic income bill re-tabled in the Senate | Investment Executive

                  PBO estimated in April 2021 basic income could cut poverty by 49%

                  favicon

                  Investment Executive (www.investmentexecutive.com)

                  Let’s discuss.

                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                  daryl@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #22

                  Bill S-233 was previously introduced in 2021 and reached consideration by the Senate’s Standing Committee on National Finance before Parliament was prorogued.

                  What struck me most about the article is that, a Bill first introduced to the Senate in 1921, and then buried, could be resurrected by the Senate acting independently of the HoC, after some 4 years had passed and a brand new government, new leader.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • BeBopALouieB BeBopALouie

                    Link Preview Image
                    Guaranteed basic income bill re-tabled in the Senate | Investment Executive

                    PBO estimated in April 2021 basic income could cut poverty by 49%

                    favicon

                    Investment Executive (www.investmentexecutive.com)

                    Let’s discuss.

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    shaggysnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    Instead of tying this a certain income level, why not just make universal instead? That way instead of spending resources on seeing someone is eligible for basic income, the Government can use it investigate fraudulent cases.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • BeBopALouieB BeBopALouie

                      Link Preview Image
                      Guaranteed basic income bill re-tabled in the Senate | Investment Executive

                      PBO estimated in April 2021 basic income could cut poverty by 49%

                      favicon

                      Investment Executive (www.investmentexecutive.com)

                      Let’s discuss.

                      magic@lemmy.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                      magic@lemmy.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                      magic@lemmy.ca
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      “People with disabilities would receive an extra 6,000 a year.”

                      As someone on ODSP, I would strongly appreciate this happening. The federal Disability Benefit is only accessible to those who got accepted for the Disability Tax Credit, and being on ODSP, it’s like every little thing happens each month to warrant that 100 dollars I gotta pay my doctor to fill it out being inaccessible to me. Also lets be real here— a weeks worth of groceries sacrificed for the mere possibility of getting 250 a month is nice and all, but I’d rather not have another week where I’m too exhausted to do anything because my diet isn’t kept in check.

                      At least in July, ODSP recipients are getting roughly 40 dollars extra!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post