Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Conservatives Speak Out In Support Of Convoy Organizers

Conservatives Speak Out In Support Of Convoy Organizers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
77 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N njm1314@lemmy.world

    Well if that choice is so bad for you then maybe don’t make it. That’s how choices work. I can choose to inject myself with bleach right now, I’d probably die, so I’m not going to make that choice. No one’s forcing me not to make that choice no one can stop me. That’s called consequence. It is beyond childish to think you should never face consequences for your choices. That’s not the same as being forced.

    L This user is from outside of this forum
    L This user is from outside of this forum
    lovecanada@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by lovecanada@lemmy.ca
    #41

    If you are given options its a choice like ‘hey we value your THIRTY YEARS of service so you can work on a different unit for now, or you can take an unpaid leave, or you can do administrative work at home til the epidemic subsides’ THAT would be a choice.

    If its ‘You have to get the vaccine or we’ll fire you’, thats not a consequence, thats force’ She was most definitely FORCED to resign.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L lovecanada@lemmy.ca

      Lol. She did it exceptionally well for 30 years and there are many children alive today because of her care and YOU’RE going to pass judgement on her? LOL. Oh please.

      B This user is from outside of this forum
      B This user is from outside of this forum
      beejboytyson@lemmy.world
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      It was her job which she refuses to protect others. Sorry you don’t get points for doing your job.

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      5
      • S slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca

        I somewhat agree. But how do you make laws for forcing people to get vaccines, yet let them choose to have abortions, or refuse medical care, or eat garbage food, drink alcohol etc, for example?

        Like, how would you define that on a societal level, and also have exceptions for situations the law doesnt account for?

        These things dont exactly equate, but I can see why being forced by the government to get a vaccines irks some people. I think it all stems from them thinking that vaccines harm you, or cause autism or whatever. That and that we haven’t had a truly deadly pandemic or disease going around in living memory (thanks again to science and our predecessors getting vaccinated) that would cause people to prefer the vaccine over say polio. People are losing fath in institutions and we are not educating our children with critical thinking enough.

        A This user is from outside of this forum
        A This user is from outside of this forum
        alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        The only one in there you listed that doesn’t affect only the person making the decision is vaccines. The classic quote is something like “Your freedom to swing your fist ends at someone’s face.”

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        5
        • S slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca

          I somewhat agree. But how do you make laws for forcing people to get vaccines, yet let them choose to have abortions, or refuse medical care, or eat garbage food, drink alcohol etc, for example?

          Like, how would you define that on a societal level, and also have exceptions for situations the law doesnt account for?

          These things dont exactly equate, but I can see why being forced by the government to get a vaccines irks some people. I think it all stems from them thinking that vaccines harm you, or cause autism or whatever. That and that we haven’t had a truly deadly pandemic or disease going around in living memory (thanks again to science and our predecessors getting vaccinated) that would cause people to prefer the vaccine over say polio. People are losing fath in institutions and we are not educating our children with critical thinking enough.

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          soup@lemmy.world
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          The other comments put it well in saying that vaccines affect other people. Though, oddly enough, we do need better laws regarding what food can be sold as far as that one goes because companies making sugar-filled, addictive food very much on purpose is an action they take for personal gain that relies on hurting others.

          For sure people are losing faith in institutions, and that is largely because of the critical thinking issues you mentioned and also the fact that we can’t help ourselves but elect at least a few untrustworthy people into office. The people who attended the convoy were largely Conservative voters and if they have a problem with the government they’re only going to make it that much worse by putting the scummiest people you know into positions of power.

          These also aren’t really problems if you think about them or look to places that have already worked them out.

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • S slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca

            Not sure where I stand on the vaccine thing.

            I fully support science and think vaccines should be mandatory, especially during a global pandemic that we haven’t seen in a hundred years. Or, for example, measle vaccines before exposing yourself to others during a measles outbreak.

            I’m also for body autonomy with abortion and what medical care and what vaccines you receive.

            It cuts both ways.

            In the end I think the failing here is education. Not enforcement. IMO most reasonable people would take the vaccine. The only reason reasonable people don’t is because they do not trust government or science, due to lack of education or understanding.

            N This user is from outside of this forum
            N This user is from outside of this forum
            non_burglar@lemmy.world
            wrote on last edited by
            #45

            You really just needed to think an extra 10 minutes before writing this down.

            It doesn’t “cut both ways” those are two separate issues: personal health and public health.

            If you think seat belts, fluoride in water, warning labels on poison bottles, bittrex in antifreeze are being foisted upon your personal choices, then you need to reconsider that there are other people than you in the world.

            It’s not that complicated: get vaccinated so you and others are less likely to die when disease rolls around.

            1 Reply Last reply
            11
            • B beejboytyson@lemmy.world

              someone’s abort doesn’t kill a strangers kids or grand parents. Come on use your brain or stop being disingenuous.

              S This user is from outside of this forum
              S This user is from outside of this forum
              slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by
              #46

              I agree with you, but that is not THEIR perspective. Many of them believe abortion IS murder.

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S soup@lemmy.world

                The other comments put it well in saying that vaccines affect other people. Though, oddly enough, we do need better laws regarding what food can be sold as far as that one goes because companies making sugar-filled, addictive food very much on purpose is an action they take for personal gain that relies on hurting others.

                For sure people are losing faith in institutions, and that is largely because of the critical thinking issues you mentioned and also the fact that we can’t help ourselves but elect at least a few untrustworthy people into office. The people who attended the convoy were largely Conservative voters and if they have a problem with the government they’re only going to make it that much worse by putting the scummiest people you know into positions of power.

                These also aren’t really problems if you think about them or look to places that have already worked them out.

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca
                #47

                I agree. I’m from Australia, and vaccinations are mandatory and required, like you will be ordered by a court, and have your children removed if they are not vaccinated type of thing. I agree with this law.

                I think people downvoting here are not understanding what I’m saying, or I didn’t explain it well enough. I’m not saying anti vaxxers are right. I am saying they have some merit with their arguments, but ultimately they only think these ideas due to lack of education and critical thinking.

                P S 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • B beejboytyson@lemmy.world

                  It was her job which she refuses to protect others. Sorry you don’t get points for doing your job.

                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  lovecanada@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #48

                  What about her employers obligation to protect HER? She was there for 30 years and she had already suffered physical damage from a previous vaccine that her employer required (SARS). To FORCE her to endanger herself further was illogical and unfair.

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A alsimoneau@lemmy.ca

                    The only one in there you listed that doesn’t affect only the person making the decision is vaccines. The classic quote is something like “Your freedom to swing your fist ends at someone’s face.”

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #49

                    Its not as absolute as it sounds. While vaccines do have externalities (eg: protection of others via herd immunity), so do the others I mentioned:

                    Refusing medical care can increase long-term public healthcare costs, especially in countries with socialized medicine, luke Canada

                    Eating garbage food or drinking excessively leads to chronic disease burdens (obesity, diabetes, liver disease), again impacting public systems and reducing workforce productivity. You could argue that this is mitigate through alcohol tax.

                    Abortion is more complicated, but opponents would argue there’s another life at stake, so from their moral framework, it’s not purely personal either.

                    The “freedom ends at someone else’s face” is useful but oversimplified. The real challenge is defining when individual choices cross the line into collective consequences, and which ones merit state intervention. Vaccines are one of the clearest examples, yes, but they’re not the only ones with spillover effects.

                    So my point is how do you define that line, legally? I think it needs to remain pragmatic. Societies change faster than laws do.

                    C A 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • S slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca

                      I agree. I’m from Australia, and vaccinations are mandatory and required, like you will be ordered by a court, and have your children removed if they are not vaccinated type of thing. I agree with this law.

                      I think people downvoting here are not understanding what I’m saying, or I didn’t explain it well enough. I’m not saying anti vaxxers are right. I am saying they have some merit with their arguments, but ultimately they only think these ideas due to lack of education and critical thinking.

                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      policeshootout@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #50

                      I think you brought up valid points and people are kind of over reacting. I agree education is the problem but what you said also got me to see the “not vaccinating myself is causing harm to others” viewpoint. Some here are being rude instead of engaging in better conversation. Your comment got me to think and read others.

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • S slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca

                        I somewhat agree. But how do you make laws for forcing people to get vaccines, yet let them choose to have abortions, or refuse medical care, or eat garbage food, drink alcohol etc, for example?

                        Like, how would you define that on a societal level, and also have exceptions for situations the law doesnt account for?

                        These things dont exactly equate, but I can see why being forced by the government to get a vaccines irks some people. I think it all stems from them thinking that vaccines harm you, or cause autism or whatever. That and that we haven’t had a truly deadly pandemic or disease going around in living memory (thanks again to science and our predecessors getting vaccinated) that would cause people to prefer the vaccine over say polio. People are losing fath in institutions and we are not educating our children with critical thinking enough.

                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        bcsven@lemmy.ca
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #51

                        I get you are trying to open a philosophical debate, people are seeing it as strictly antivax, probably the wrong forum to discuss philosophy

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • P policeshootout@lemmy.ca

                          I think you brought up valid points and people are kind of over reacting. I agree education is the problem but what you said also got me to see the “not vaccinating myself is causing harm to others” viewpoint. Some here are being rude instead of engaging in better conversation. Your comment got me to think and read others.

                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
                          wrote on last edited by corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
                          #52

                          Some here are being rude instead of engaging in better conversation.

                          People are tired. People still hold the feelings of frustration over the needless deaths, life-altering conditions and overworked medical staff who quit over the workload and aggressive and violent patients – all of it needless, all of it prolonged needlessly by the ignorant people whose personal importance overshadowed their community obligations and risked the 1:1000000 with actual issues and others who needed to rely on ‘herd’ immunity.

                          You know this. You saw this. You MUST understand this. Some of us lost friends and family, and in the last months of it we knew those lost would have been safe if the ignorant gits actually took their medicine. We hear the logic of the anti-vaxxer, we hear how it sounds like a drunk driver saying “but I need to drive home”, and we see anti-vaxxers who avoided the single most tested set of vaccines as the same as those negligent, homicidal drunks.

                          We’re not rude intentionally. We’re frustrated and tired at explaining something as simple as “trees are wood” to people retorting with “needles are scary so let the others die”. We’re annoyed we had to say it twice, let alone all the hundred of times after. And now someone says “but I’m important and I know more than doctors” and we aren’t at our best in that moment.

                          But how is “I see the point of anti-vax narcissists” not just trolling by now?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          4
                          • S slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca

                            Its not as absolute as it sounds. While vaccines do have externalities (eg: protection of others via herd immunity), so do the others I mentioned:

                            Refusing medical care can increase long-term public healthcare costs, especially in countries with socialized medicine, luke Canada

                            Eating garbage food or drinking excessively leads to chronic disease burdens (obesity, diabetes, liver disease), again impacting public systems and reducing workforce productivity. You could argue that this is mitigate through alcohol tax.

                            Abortion is more complicated, but opponents would argue there’s another life at stake, so from their moral framework, it’s not purely personal either.

                            The “freedom ends at someone else’s face” is useful but oversimplified. The real challenge is defining when individual choices cross the line into collective consequences, and which ones merit state intervention. Vaccines are one of the clearest examples, yes, but they’re not the only ones with spillover effects.

                            So my point is how do you define that line, legally? I think it needs to remain pragmatic. Societies change faster than laws do.

                            C This user is from outside of this forum
                            C This user is from outside of this forum
                            corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #53

                            Abortion is more complicated, but opponents would argue there’s another life at stake, so from their moral framework, it’s not purely personal either.

                            This is another issue I’m surprised we’re still even debating.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • L lovecanada@lemmy.ca

                              If you are given options its a choice like ‘hey we value your THIRTY YEARS of service so you can work on a different unit for now, or you can take an unpaid leave, or you can do administrative work at home til the epidemic subsides’ THAT would be a choice.

                              If its ‘You have to get the vaccine or we’ll fire you’, thats not a consequence, thats force’ She was most definitely FORCED to resign.

                              N This user is from outside of this forum
                              N This user is from outside of this forum
                              njm1314@lemmy.world
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #54

                              What an absurd life you must live. I just imagine you walking around all day going yeah my work forces me to wear pants. By coming to work naked they’ll fire me so they’re forcing me to not be naked. Like that is your mindset here. Anytime any consequences happen you believe you’re being forced to do something. It’s absurd.

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L lovecanada@lemmy.ca

                                What about her employers obligation to protect HER? She was there for 30 years and she had already suffered physical damage from a previous vaccine that her employer required (SARS). To FORCE her to endanger herself further was illogical and unfair.

                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                beejboytyson@lemmy.world
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #55

                                Don’t go into a sick field if you prone to sickness? I don’t like bridges I take tunnels figure it out. No, her comfort and what she wanted aren’t what’s best for the patients. Not that hard.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • S slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca

                                  I agree with you, but that is not THEIR perspective. Many of them believe abortion IS murder.

                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  beejboytyson@lemmy.world
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #56

                                  I bet the believe in magical sky men that can bring back ppl from the dead too. When you take that stance you’re kinda not a critical thinker. I prefer to learn from ppl that know a lot.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • B beejboytyson@lemmy.world

                                    Don’t go into a sick field if you prone to sickness? I don’t like bridges I take tunnels figure it out. No, her comfort and what she wanted aren’t what’s best for the patients. Not that hard.

                                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    lovecanada@lemmy.ca
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #57

                                    She wasnt ‘prone’ to sickness til the hospital forced her to get a SARS shot after nearly 20 years there. Not her fault she got sick from it.

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • N njm1314@lemmy.world

                                      What an absurd life you must live. I just imagine you walking around all day going yeah my work forces me to wear pants. By coming to work naked they’ll fire me so they’re forcing me to not be naked. Like that is your mindset here. Anytime any consequences happen you believe you’re being forced to do something. It’s absurd.

                                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lovecanada@lemmy.ca
                                      wrote on last edited by lovecanada@lemmy.ca
                                      #58

                                      Yeah wearing pants is exactly the same as taking a shot that MAY protect you from covid (It didnt. I still got covid, so did three people in my family who were also vaccinated) or it may actually make you sicker.

                                      Which is why the gov has accepted admissions from 2700 Canadians who were damaged by the vaccine and have already paid out 18 million in damages to them with more to come. https://vaccineinjurysupport.ca/en/program-statistics

                                      So yeah, thats exactly like wearing pants to work.

                                      N 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L lovecanada@lemmy.ca

                                        Yeah wearing pants is exactly the same as taking a shot that MAY protect you from covid (It didnt. I still got covid, so did three people in my family who were also vaccinated) or it may actually make you sicker.

                                        Which is why the gov has accepted admissions from 2700 Canadians who were damaged by the vaccine and have already paid out 18 million in damages to them with more to come. https://vaccineinjurysupport.ca/en/program-statistics

                                        So yeah, thats exactly like wearing pants to work.

                                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                                        njm1314@lemmy.world
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #59

                                        Glad you can admit it weirdo

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L lovecanada@lemmy.ca

                                          She wasnt ‘prone’ to sickness til the hospital forced her to get a SARS shot after nearly 20 years there. Not her fault she got sick from it.

                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          beejboytyson@lemmy.world
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #60

                                          OK. But she shouldn’t be selfish enough not to step down. Listen you wanna justify shitty behavior go ahead idc idk 🤷‍♂️ hope she gets better gl brother

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post