Is it good to use AI to enhance accessibility—transcriptions, alt-text, tone calibration, all the stuff that makes communication smoother?
-
Is it good to use AI to enhance accessibility—transcriptions, alt-text, tone calibration, all the stuff that makes communication smoother?
Or is AI morally wrong no matter the purpose, even when it removes barriers?
The outcome of the poll won’t change how I use these tools, but I’m genuinely curious where people land.
-
Is it good to use AI to enhance accessibility—transcriptions, alt-text, tone calibration, all the stuff that makes communication smoother?
Or is AI morally wrong no matter the purpose, even when it removes barriers?
The outcome of the poll won’t change how I use these tools, but I’m genuinely curious where people land.
Anyone who has received mail through the post-office has used AI (regardless of whether they realize it or not).
-
Anyone who has received mail through the post-office has used AI (regardless of whether they realize it or not).
@reiver I know, but the purpose of the poll is to measure ethical stance.
People who are anti-AI absolutist would say, “It’s not my choice to receive mail that way, and I didn’t know—and I prefer AI to be removed.”
This doesn’t have to be a reasonable stance. But it’s a stance.
