Let's do this.
-
Let's do this.
Good man.
-
@breizh @TechConnectify uranium is neither renewable nor free to harvest at low operating costs. nuclear power is an uniquely insane upfront investment & constant operating expenses and a lot of societal operating expenses to safely store the nuclear waste. until such time it can be safely transmuted. That is also a huge investment to develop and scale that technology.
the last time nuclear power was built it was only possible because the cold war needed the technology to be dual use otherwise it would have just been building nukes to collect dust somewhere.
hot tran*sexual menace Well, that’s not the conclusion of the IPCC, and I trust them more than I trust you. I’ll still argue for the time being, but you don’t have to trust me neither (one of us is lying, since we’re saying the opposite, so… we’ll need to trust someone else to know who is right).
-
Uranium isn’t renewable, I’ve already said it, but it will last for centuries in the current use we do, and millenia if we manage it correctly (for example France could last 3000 years on what they already have in stock. Without extracting any more. But we need to build power plant that can use this stock (we already have in the past, but since it was cheaper to extract new ore at that time we stopped. This and politicals chenanigans too). Steam machines aren’t two centuries old, so millenia of energy is a lot of time to find better sources (and it could be renewables, when they will even better than nuclear, or when we will reach the limits of uranium).
-
It’s not free to harvest, but neither are the materials for renewables and batteries. Sure, we can recycle, but uranium too (a little bit of extraction will be needed in both case because recycling is never perfect). And uranium have a very high energy density, so a lot of people over-estimate the quantity we need to extract. We are talking about few orders of magnitude here (see also the attached picture :D).
-
The operationnal costs aren’t that high when you count it by MWh. It produce a lot, and I mean, A LOT of power during it’s lifetime, so at the end, it’s pretty cheap. Waste storage isn’t that costly too. You can just burry it. It’s no more dangerous than natural ore patches, and way less dangerous than a lot of other pollution we make. A human life worth of nuclear power waste if all the energy we used was nuclear can be stored in a Coke can (without recycling!). The chemical and plastic pollution produced by a human during it’s life are way worse (you see the comparision of landfill for solar panels. It’s the same, but even smaller).
-
The technology built for the military use have nothing to do with the one used for power anymore (except maybe nuclear-powered boats and submarines). Well, we even are recycling cold war weapons into nuclear fuel ^^’ It’s still pretty cheap, if done correctly (today what cost more is the way we are financing it. If it was paid directly by the state via taxes, as it should like the power grid, it would be cheaper. But since we take out loans and use private financing, more than half of the produced electricty sale price goes to pay interest… that’s a problem. Especially since we are building for 80 years or more: the people who will benefit the more from it aren’t even born, so it can’t be done by people that want a ROI during their lives. It have to be made by a state for its future citizens).
-
-
@TechConnectify Democrats just voted to continue funding DHS. Democrats have demonatrated they don't care about Palestinians and nor do they care about you.
and yes, the lithium only has to be mined once, but where is the mine? not your back yard! it will come from further colonial expansion.
@burnitdown @TechConnectify Yes, the Democrats are not perfect. Nowhere near perfect even. Alec mentioned that in the video too.
But don't forget the reality that the US is stuck in a two-party system. You basically have 3 options:
- Vote Republicans
- Vote Democrats
- Don't vote
Option 1 is obviously worst, no need to discuss that.
But not voting is still worse that voting for the Democrats. Don't let your vote go to waste. The rest of the world counts on you!
As someone from the rest of the world, specifically from a country with (way) more than 2 parties, I sincerely hope that someday the US will reform their system and get more than 2 parties too. But first you need to get rid of the current administration, asap.
-
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify Bravery and clarity noted and appreciated.
-
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify Thank you Alec
-
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify Found the time to watch today. Absolutely your best work, even before the call to action at the end.
-
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify loved this episode. Well done
-
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify Watched beyond the "fake ending".
Disinformation is at the core of the problem. (your videos provide facts, but others use disinformation to sway people to support their agenda (such as windmills causing cancer or killing whales).
Suggest two videos:
Lies Spread Faster Than Facts'—Maria Ressa at the UN #UNGA80 | United Nations
18:39 https://youtu.be/Yeh3o4aRHCsAnd her address at the 80th General Assembly:
Maria Ressa at UNGA 80th anniv: 'Information integrity is the mother of all battles'
Rapple
09:55 https://youtu.be/cll7gqE3TlgMrs Ressa was imprisoned in Philippines based on lies amplified on social media to make her look like she had committed crimes.
If you followed the Cambridge Analytica investigations, the real companies behind it, SCL, had helped prop up regimes by using social media to spread lines against opponents. Used same technique for 2016 elections against Clinton. Russia Wagner is same.
Project 2025 has fossil roadmap and amplify lies to support it
-
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify To Sum up Maria Ressa:
The conspiracies from your strange uncle used to be limited to the family dinner table at Thanksgiving. Now, they get amplified bny for-profit solcial media and used by politicians to help drive their anti-fact agendas.
This is bigger than the current regime. Bush Jr (Rumsfeld/Wolfowitz/Cheney) used same technique to repeat lies on Iraq until people thought they were true. But your current regime has upped the ante by orders of magnitures to the population to support their agenda and anyone not supporting those lies labeled as anti patriotic (or domestic terrorist).
Your videos have a goal of providing facts. Your current government has a goal of driving agenda with conspiracies and discredit any facts that are in the way of their agenda.
This ad from Icelandair shows how the culture of conspiracies and not beleiving in facts has permeated US culture:
https://youtu.be/nhHMsvfug24 -
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify god damn dude, that ending was spicy.
but yeah, really solid education throughout.
-
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify The. Best. Video. Ever.
Thank you for putting it out there! Especially the part after the fake ending. Super important for everyone to watch and get educated!
-
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify Best video you've ever done. Technology connections are also human connections. Well done.
-
@TechConnectify Heck yeah Midwestern frugality!
@faoluin @TechConnectify it totally befuddles me that the same masculinity which creates "don't touch the thermostat" also creates coal rollers. The same person is like "off grid" and "suckling at the teat of The Man".
I think the thing Tech Connections does really well is connect those two halves of that brain.
-
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify
Jesus Christ! When you said you'd be surprised what way this video would turn, you weren't kidding.
You turned off comments (kind of naturally) on your YT but I've been watching for years unsubscribed.
I love your channel and will keep watching (unless you bring your politics into it).
+
+ -
@TechConnectify
Jesus Christ! When you said you'd be surprised what way this video would turn, you weren't kidding.
You turned off comments (kind of naturally) on your YT but I've been watching for years unsubscribed.
I love your channel and will keep watching (unless you bring your politics into it).
+
+@TechConnectify
I wanted to address the ICE issue. 9 ICE agents have died vs 2 protesters. They are in a dangerous job.
The guy who got shot was allowed to carry a gun but if you declare you're armed then reach into your pocket unexpectedly you will be shot -
@TechConnectify
I wanted to address the ICE issue. 9 ICE agents have died vs 2 protesters. They are in a dangerous job.
The guy who got shot was allowed to carry a gun but if you declare you're armed then reach into your pocket unexpectedly you will be shot@TechConnectify
It's not nice that he died but play silly games win silly prizes. -
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify
Thanks a lot for this
️ -
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify this is simply a great video, i really recommend to watch to the end!
-
hot tran*sexual menace Well, that’s not the conclusion of the IPCC, and I trust them more than I trust you. I’ll still argue for the time being, but you don’t have to trust me neither (one of us is lying, since we’re saying the opposite, so… we’ll need to trust someone else to know who is right).
-
Uranium isn’t renewable, I’ve already said it, but it will last for centuries in the current use we do, and millenia if we manage it correctly (for example France could last 3000 years on what they already have in stock. Without extracting any more. But we need to build power plant that can use this stock (we already have in the past, but since it was cheaper to extract new ore at that time we stopped. This and politicals chenanigans too). Steam machines aren’t two centuries old, so millenia of energy is a lot of time to find better sources (and it could be renewables, when they will even better than nuclear, or when we will reach the limits of uranium).
-
It’s not free to harvest, but neither are the materials for renewables and batteries. Sure, we can recycle, but uranium too (a little bit of extraction will be needed in both case because recycling is never perfect). And uranium have a very high energy density, so a lot of people over-estimate the quantity we need to extract. We are talking about few orders of magnitude here (see also the attached picture :D).
-
The operationnal costs aren’t that high when you count it by MWh. It produce a lot, and I mean, A LOT of power during it’s lifetime, so at the end, it’s pretty cheap. Waste storage isn’t that costly too. You can just burry it. It’s no more dangerous than natural ore patches, and way less dangerous than a lot of other pollution we make. A human life worth of nuclear power waste if all the energy we used was nuclear can be stored in a Coke can (without recycling!). The chemical and plastic pollution produced by a human during it’s life are way worse (you see the comparision of landfill for solar panels. It’s the same, but even smaller).
-
The technology built for the military use have nothing to do with the one used for power anymore (except maybe nuclear-powered boats and submarines). Well, we even are recycling cold war weapons into nuclear fuel ^^’ It’s still pretty cheap, if done correctly (today what cost more is the way we are financing it. If it was paid directly by the state via taxes, as it should like the power grid, it would be cheaper. But since we take out loans and use private financing, more than half of the produced electricty sale price goes to pay interest… that’s a problem. Especially since we are building for 80 years or more: the people who will benefit the more from it aren’t even born, so it can’t be done by people that want a ROI during their lives. It have to be made by a state for its future citizens).
Yes it doesn't produce CO2, but just why do you want nuclear? It makes no economic sense. It's a large, inflexible investment that requires constant use and future operating expenses are much higher than 0.
I've heard all the stuff you wrote before and some of it is true but it doesn't change the truth of what I wrote. I don't know why you are emotionally and ideologically invested with the nuclear steam engine but it is really annoying that you didn't even critically think about anything that I said.
And touching on a point pertaining who is lying:
The water boiler-steam engine that are common today aren't optimized for creating Plutonium yes. But all the infrastructure up until that point the fuel is put into pellets is dual use. The water boiler-steam engine is only the last component, which doesn't invalidate the point i made.
-
-
Let's do this.
@TechConnectify Thanks so much for making this great video! First, I was not sure I would watch it comletely b/c it appeared a bit long but every minute was worth it!
