Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. rpg
  3. Thoughts on preemptively banning Gen-AI?

Thoughts on preemptively banning Gen-AI?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved rpg
rpg
89 Posts 30 Posters 12 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • FaceDeerF This user is from outside of this forum
    FaceDeerF This user is from outside of this forum
    FaceDeer
    wrote last edited by
    #48

    That would depend on the wording of the general rule, which would depend on what exactly it’s trying to accomplish.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • INeedManaI INeedMana

      I’m afraid the result will be exactly opposite. A lot of smaller creators use AI in some form (some better, some worse), where one most probably won’t ban D&D from community named “rpg” because, even with the hatred from non-D&D crowd, the interest is too big to not address it

      SavvyWolfS This user is from outside of this forum
      SavvyWolfS This user is from outside of this forum
      SavvyWolf
      wrote last edited by
      #49

      If someone doesn’t care enough about their product to actually do work on it, why should I care about looking at it? If I wanted to see AI generated slop, I’d go to one of the many megacorps that’ll generate it for me rather than paying some guy on Itch.io.

      INeedManaI 1 Reply Last reply
      15
      • INeedManaI INeedMana

        Wouldn’t that mean that only those who are big enough to afford commissioning art (or not be afraid to lie about generating it) will pass?

        SavvyWolfS This user is from outside of this forum
        SavvyWolfS This user is from outside of this forum
        SavvyWolf
        wrote last edited by
        #50

        Public domain or stock images combined with an afternoon of Gimp/Krita.

        Had a friend who started with no experience and they managed to make some damn professional looking art for their playbook.

        INeedManaI 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          Skua
          wrote last edited by
          #51

          Presumably ensuring that other types of content don’t get crowded out. I’m not sure how a general anti-spam rule would manage that. The solution I’ve seen elsewhere is to restrict certain types of content (like meme posts) to specific days of the week

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • KichaeK Kichae

            if it’s being uploaded, then it means the community likes it

            That really isn’t how the Internet works at all. Someone uploading something just means that that person likes it. It’s not like they’re uploading based on the collective psychic demands of the rest of the community.

            T This user is from outside of this forum
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            tramort@programming.dev
            wrote last edited by
            #52

            thanks; that was a typo. I have edited it to upvoted, which is what I intended.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • KichaeK Kichae

              Believe it or not, you can release written content without professional art. Used to be done all the time. Deciding you want to skip ahead in your progress as a publisher and use tools that have been built off the back of unconsenting contributors doesn’t entitle you to someone’s platform.

              INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
              INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
              INeedMana
              wrote last edited by
              #53

              Yes, one can do that. But, probably because of how content ( in broad meaning) works, it’s not being done. That’s why I’m afraid such rule would mostly cut out the small-fries

              W 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • SavvyWolfS SavvyWolf

                Public domain or stock images combined with an afternoon of Gimp/Krita.

                Had a friend who started with no experience and they managed to make some damn professional looking art for their playbook.

                INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                INeedMana
                wrote last edited by
                #54

                I’m afraid they are an exception to what is happening

                1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • nocturne@slrpnk.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nocturne@slrpnk.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nocturne@slrpnk.net
                  wrote last edited by
                  #55

                  I am fine with that.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  5
                  • Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary

                    Just because you generally need a cover image doesn't mean that it's good to support systems whose primary use case is to drive real artists into hiding.

                    INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                    INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                    INeedMana
                    wrote last edited by
                    #56

                    Sure. But wouldn’t such rule mean we dismiss also those who do bring something to the table but just try to get anyone’s attention?

                    Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • INeedManaI INeedMana

                      Sure. But wouldn’t such rule mean we dismiss also those who do bring something to the table but just try to get anyone’s attention?

                      Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP This user is from outside of this forum
                      Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP This user is from outside of this forum
                      Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary
                      wrote last edited by
                      #57

                      Not if they don't scam people to get that attention.

                      INeedManaI 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • SavvyWolfS SavvyWolf

                        If someone doesn’t care enough about their product to actually do work on it, why should I care about looking at it? If I wanted to see AI generated slop, I’d go to one of the many megacorps that’ll generate it for me rather than paying some guy on Itch.io.

                        INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                        INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                        INeedMana
                        wrote last edited by
                        #58

                        That is right. But that is not what all AIGen stuff is. If someone creates a cool adventure but uses AIGen to make their fluff box sound like a radio speaker because they lack the skills to make it so, is that a not caring enough?

                        Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP 1 Reply Last reply
                        5
                        • Z ziggurat@jlai.lu

                          This is indeed the thing, there is a long road between using an AI powered spell checker, and a full AI generated game.

                          Let’s go further, if a volunteer uses their deepl subscription to translate an indie game they like (with the author’s permission) , and do a manual review afterward. The kind of stuff you can sometimes do for your player, is it AI slop?

                          INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                          INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                          INeedMana
                          wrote last edited by
                          #59

                          Exactly. I think that the issue is not black and white

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • INeedManaI INeedMana

                            That is right. But that is not what all AIGen stuff is. If someone creates a cool adventure but uses AIGen to make their fluff box sound like a radio speaker because they lack the skills to make it so, is that a not caring enough?

                            Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP This user is from outside of this forum
                            Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP This user is from outside of this forum
                            Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary
                            wrote last edited by
                            #60

                            Nope, it isn't.

                            Cheaters should never be allowed to prosper. It undermines the entire idea that creative work is of value, and will inevitably lead to a day when artists are seen as as much of a piece of scum on someone's shoe as cashiers are.

                            INeedManaI 1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                              INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                              INeedMana
                              wrote last edited by
                              #61

                              That’s great. And it should be encouraged. But what about modern+ settings?

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary

                                Not if they don't scam people to get that attention.

                                INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                                INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                                INeedMana
                                wrote last edited by
                                #62

                                I’m afraid that’s a very high bar ATM

                                Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary

                                  Nope, it isn't.

                                  Cheaters should never be allowed to prosper. It undermines the entire idea that creative work is of value, and will inevitably lead to a day when artists are seen as as much of a piece of scum on someone's shoe as cashiers are.

                                  INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  INeedManaI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  INeedMana
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #63

                                  I think we are way past the point when creative work is enough

                                  Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  4
                                  • INeedManaI INeedMana

                                    I think we are way past the point when creative work is enough

                                    Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #64

                                    So you're arguing so hard to replace artists because you already don't value them?

                                    INeedManaI 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • INeedManaI INeedMana

                                      I’m afraid that’s a very high bar ATM

                                      Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #65

                                      It's meant to be a high bar forever.

                                      "Generative AI" is a scam perpetrated by people who hate artists, while envying their capacity to create art, while also not understanding what art really is. Period.

                                      INeedManaI 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • INeedManaI INeedMana

                                        That’s great. And it should be encouraged. But what about modern+ settings?

                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Skua
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #66

                                        Oh definitely, it’s not a universal solution. Just figured I’d mention a less obvious option that has helped me out before

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • J This user is from outside of this forum
                                          J This user is from outside of this forum
                                          justOnePersistentKbinPlease
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #67

                                          That is a straw man.

                                          I never said banning non open source. I equated corporate “AI” with the corporate practice of stealing open source projects.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          6

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post