Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Heard someone say that because CompSci degrees focus on theory and concepts rather than marketable skills, graduates enter the workforce and are frustrated because they have to learn on their own.

Heard someone say that because CompSci degrees focus on theory and concepts rather than marketable skills, graduates enter the workforce and are frustrated because they have to learn on their own.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
5 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • calcifer :nes_fire:C This user is from outside of this forum
    calcifer :nes_fire:C This user is from outside of this forum
    calcifer :nes_fire:
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Heard someone say that because CompSci degrees focus on theory and concepts rather than marketable skills, graduates enter the workforce and are frustrated because they have to learn on their own.

    But… that’s the point of a degree program? Learn foundations so you can self-teach skills or have better outcomes from skills training

    calcifer :nes_fire:C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • calcifer :nes_fire:C calcifer :nes_fire:

      Heard someone say that because CompSci degrees focus on theory and concepts rather than marketable skills, graduates enter the workforce and are frustrated because they have to learn on their own.

      But… that’s the point of a degree program? Learn foundations so you can self-teach skills or have better outcomes from skills training

      calcifer :nes_fire:C This user is from outside of this forum
      calcifer :nes_fire:C This user is from outside of this forum
      calcifer :nes_fire:
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Maybe because I didn’t go the degree route, I’m missing something. But “oh no, you graduate and have to still learn things!” seems like such a weird take.

      Vocational training exists, if we just want to learn specific skills. You go to college for something different than that.

      Alex KeaneS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • calcifer :nes_fire:C calcifer :nes_fire:

        Maybe because I didn’t go the degree route, I’m missing something. But “oh no, you graduate and have to still learn things!” seems like such a weird take.

        Vocational training exists, if we just want to learn specific skills. You go to college for something different than that.

        Alex KeaneS This user is from outside of this forum
        Alex KeaneS This user is from outside of this forum
        Alex Keane
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @calcifer My degree didn't teach me any of the concrete facts I need day to day (they are subject to change).

        Instead it focused on how to research those bits and string them together on the fly.

        Had it focused on the what instead of the how, it'd have been obsolete five minutes out the door.

        calcifer :nes_fire:C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Alex KeaneS Alex Keane

          @calcifer My degree didn't teach me any of the concrete facts I need day to day (they are subject to change).

          Instead it focused on how to research those bits and string them together on the fly.

          Had it focused on the what instead of the how, it'd have been obsolete five minutes out the door.

          calcifer :nes_fire:C This user is from outside of this forum
          calcifer :nes_fire:C This user is from outside of this forum
          calcifer :nes_fire:
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @squishymage42 exactly! The whole approach of college-style education is to teach fundamentals and create a person who has the base ability to effectively learn to practice within their chosen field. This is a good thing, even if it’s definitely not the only path.

          It’s weird to think that path is broken because it’s not another path.

          Alex KeaneS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • calcifer :nes_fire:C calcifer :nes_fire:

            @squishymage42 exactly! The whole approach of college-style education is to teach fundamentals and create a person who has the base ability to effectively learn to practice within their chosen field. This is a good thing, even if it’s definitely not the only path.

            It’s weird to think that path is broken because it’s not another path.

            Alex KeaneS This user is from outside of this forum
            Alex KeaneS This user is from outside of this forum
            Alex Keane
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @calcifer And like, with languages and techniques in vogue for different compsci disciplines differing so much, you definitely gotta design that program more to produce the adaptability than necessarily every graduate being a master of C++ or something.

            (CompSci is not my field so this description is colored by that level of understanding. Linguistics and Law are more my bag)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0

            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
            • First post
              Last post