Turns out "coequal" branches of government aren't so coequal when a single branch holds the entire enforcement apparatus.
-
Turns out "coequal" branches of government aren't so coequal when a single branch holds the entire enforcement apparatus.
Legislators and judges across the country are watching the government completely ignore established law and recent rulings and orders with impunity, because the crooks have the guns and the cuffs.
-
Turns out "coequal" branches of government aren't so coequal when a single branch holds the entire enforcement apparatus.
Legislators and judges across the country are watching the government completely ignore established law and recent rulings and orders with impunity, because the crooks have the guns and the cuffs.
Incidentally, this is why rational actors avoid putting criminals in power: you quickly find that the laws stop working altogether once they control who doesn't have to follow them.
-
Incidentally, this is why rational actors avoid putting criminals in power: you quickly find that the laws stop working altogether once they control who doesn't have to follow them.
-
Incidentally, this is why rational actors avoid putting criminals in power: you quickly find that the laws stop working altogether once they control who doesn't have to follow them.
@valthonis This defect in the constitution has been known for a long time too. Iirc, the Supreme Court ruled against Andrew Jackson for something to do with native removal. He just went and did it it anyway, or didn’t enforce. You’d think there’d be something done to fix that
-
P Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary shared this topic on
