Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Schools have long taught that humans populated North America around 12K yrs ago by crossing the Bering land bridge.

Schools have long taught that humans populated North America around 12K yrs ago by crossing the Bering land bridge.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
indigenous
20 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Dawn NafusD Dawn Nafus

    @Toastie Thanks for writing this! I had always balked at the phrase before reading this, because I thought it was a way for white folks to imply indigenous people were somehow static, lacking "progress" and therefore in need of a white savior. Hadn't understood the usage that you describe here until now.

    ToastieT This user is from outside of this forum
    ToastieT This user is from outside of this forum
    Toastie
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @dawnnafus Very glad to clear that up! 😄

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ToastieT Toastie

      Schools have long taught that humans populated North America around 12K yrs ago by crossing the Bering land bridge. This story supports settler colonialism, and contradicts #Indigenous stories, which offer memories of human habitation here during the last glacial maximum.

      Also, the Bering land bridge story falls apart when you find out about the century of archaeological evidence academia has vigorously suppressed.

      Read more in my new essay. 👇

      Link Preview Image
      What does ‘time immemorial’ really mean? - High Country News

      If you’ve seen the phrase time immemorial used repeatedly in Indigenous affairs reporting, there are some compelling reasons why.

      favicon

      High Country News (www.hcn.org)

      SaraS This user is from outside of this forum
      SaraS This user is from outside of this forum
      Sara
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      @Toastie boats boats boats boats

      boats boats boats

      (you will have to imagine the little dance that goes with this song; it's the kind of dance that explains why nobody invites me to archaeologist parties)

      (why would people who were EXTREMELY GOOD AT BOATS walk across an ice field)

      (ugh you've heard this rant already)

      ToastieT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ToastieT Toastie

        Schools have long taught that humans populated North America around 12K yrs ago by crossing the Bering land bridge. This story supports settler colonialism, and contradicts #Indigenous stories, which offer memories of human habitation here during the last glacial maximum.

        Also, the Bering land bridge story falls apart when you find out about the century of archaeological evidence academia has vigorously suppressed.

        Read more in my new essay. 👇

        Link Preview Image
        What does ‘time immemorial’ really mean? - High Country News

        If you’ve seen the phrase time immemorial used repeatedly in Indigenous affairs reporting, there are some compelling reasons why.

        favicon

        High Country News (www.hcn.org)

        Steve FeltenS This user is from outside of this forum
        Steve FeltenS This user is from outside of this forum
        Steve Felten
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        @Toastie I saw a film about the salmon restoration on the Columbia River at the Tamástslikt museum, and was devastated when the current administration reneged on the commitment. Wisdom from time immemorial should be shared for the benefit of all humanity. I hope we can reverse direction before it’s too late.

        ToastieT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • SaraS Sara

          @Toastie boats boats boats boats

          boats boats boats

          (you will have to imagine the little dance that goes with this song; it's the kind of dance that explains why nobody invites me to archaeologist parties)

          (why would people who were EXTREMELY GOOD AT BOATS walk across an ice field)

          (ugh you've heard this rant already)

          ToastieT This user is from outside of this forum
          ToastieT This user is from outside of this forum
          Toastie
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          @sarae I did put some effort into finding a way to shoehorn into this story that chickens got here from SE Asia (SOMEHOW (boats)) well before Europeans crossed the Atlantic.

          SaraS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Steve FeltenS Steve Felten

            @Toastie I saw a film about the salmon restoration on the Columbia River at the Tamástslikt museum, and was devastated when the current administration reneged on the commitment. Wisdom from time immemorial should be shared for the benefit of all humanity. I hope we can reverse direction before it’s too late.

            ToastieT This user is from outside of this forum
            ToastieT This user is from outside of this forum
            Toastie
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            @stevefelten I hope so too. Except that some of that wisdom isn't meant to be shared. But the salmon, their habitat, and all American watersheds and lands are crying out to be cared for properly again.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ToastieT Toastie

              @sarae I did put some effort into finding a way to shoehorn into this story that chickens got here from SE Asia (SOMEHOW (boats)) well before Europeans crossed the Atlantic.

              SaraS This user is from outside of this forum
              SaraS This user is from outside of this forum
              Sara
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              @Toastie it's a MYSTERY and was definitely not a bunch of hypercompetent Indigenous people from maritime civilizations

              (seriously I have to wonder if the problem is that not enough people have tried both snowshoeing and canoeing, because if you've done both I can't see how you argue about this land bridge crap)

              ToastieT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • SaraS Sara

                @Toastie it's a MYSTERY and was definitely not a bunch of hypercompetent Indigenous people from maritime civilizations

                (seriously I have to wonder if the problem is that not enough people have tried both snowshoeing and canoeing, because if you've done both I can't see how you argue about this land bridge crap)

                ToastieT This user is from outside of this forum
                ToastieT This user is from outside of this forum
                Toastie
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @sarae Actually now that I think about it this hemisphere is not so much the West as kinda the ultra-East. 🤔

                SaraS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ToastieT Toastie

                  Schools have long taught that humans populated North America around 12K yrs ago by crossing the Bering land bridge. This story supports settler colonialism, and contradicts #Indigenous stories, which offer memories of human habitation here during the last glacial maximum.

                  Also, the Bering land bridge story falls apart when you find out about the century of archaeological evidence academia has vigorously suppressed.

                  Read more in my new essay. 👇

                  Link Preview Image
                  What does ‘time immemorial’ really mean? - High Country News

                  If you’ve seen the phrase time immemorial used repeatedly in Indigenous affairs reporting, there are some compelling reasons why.

                  favicon

                  High Country News (www.hcn.org)

                  Ricardo HarvinR This user is from outside of this forum
                  Ricardo HarvinR This user is from outside of this forum
                  Ricardo Harvin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  @Toastie Ironic how oral histories are disregarded, considered mere tales and not real history by the white establishment, while one of the most revered written works for that establishment is Fahrenheit 451, with its book people as heroic figures.

                  ToastieT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Ricardo HarvinR Ricardo Harvin

                    @Toastie Ironic how oral histories are disregarded, considered mere tales and not real history by the white establishment, while one of the most revered written works for that establishment is Fahrenheit 451, with its book people as heroic figures.

                    ToastieT This user is from outside of this forum
                    ToastieT This user is from outside of this forum
                    Toastie
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    @ricardoharvin Only certain kinds of facts are facts. 🙃

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ToastieT Toastie

                      @sarae Actually now that I think about it this hemisphere is not so much the West as kinda the ultra-East. 🤔

                      SaraS This user is from outside of this forum
                      SaraS This user is from outside of this forum
                      Sara
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @Toastie isn't there a part in Narnia where the talking rat explains that to us?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ToastieT Toastie

                        Schools have long taught that humans populated North America around 12K yrs ago by crossing the Bering land bridge. This story supports settler colonialism, and contradicts #Indigenous stories, which offer memories of human habitation here during the last glacial maximum.

                        Also, the Bering land bridge story falls apart when you find out about the century of archaeological evidence academia has vigorously suppressed.

                        Read more in my new essay. 👇

                        Link Preview Image
                        What does ‘time immemorial’ really mean? - High Country News

                        If you’ve seen the phrase time immemorial used repeatedly in Indigenous affairs reporting, there are some compelling reasons why.

                        favicon

                        High Country News (www.hcn.org)

                        Don RayD This user is from outside of this forum
                        Don RayD This user is from outside of this forum
                        Don Ray
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        @Toastie

                        I was thinking about this archeological site while reading your essay. It’s one of the sites you mentioned: Chiquihuite Cave in Mexico. Artifacts that are possibly 33,000 years old.

                        Link Preview Image
                        Earliest evidence for humans in the Americas

                        Humans settled in the Americas much earlier than previously thought, according to new finds from Mexico.

                        favicon

                        (www.bbc.com)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ToastieT Toastie

                          Schools have long taught that humans populated North America around 12K yrs ago by crossing the Bering land bridge. This story supports settler colonialism, and contradicts #Indigenous stories, which offer memories of human habitation here during the last glacial maximum.

                          Also, the Bering land bridge story falls apart when you find out about the century of archaeological evidence academia has vigorously suppressed.

                          Read more in my new essay. 👇

                          Link Preview Image
                          What does ‘time immemorial’ really mean? - High Country News

                          If you’ve seen the phrase time immemorial used repeatedly in Indigenous affairs reporting, there are some compelling reasons why.

                          favicon

                          High Country News (www.hcn.org)

                          Steve Moore :toad:A This user is from outside of this forum
                          Steve Moore :toad:A This user is from outside of this forum
                          Steve Moore :toad:
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          @Toastie Maybe folks entrenched in a European linear time concept have a hard time bending their minds around Indigenous cyclical time. Indigenous story telling often doesn’t have a beginning or end, it wraps around itself. It can give a view from the inside and the outside simultaneously. ‘Time immemorial’ fits in that landscape.
                          When Cortez entered Tenochtitlán, he had never seen anything anywhere that could match it for beauty & sophistication. A year later, he destroyed it.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ToastieT Toastie

                            Schools have long taught that humans populated North America around 12K yrs ago by crossing the Bering land bridge. This story supports settler colonialism, and contradicts #Indigenous stories, which offer memories of human habitation here during the last glacial maximum.

                            Also, the Bering land bridge story falls apart when you find out about the century of archaeological evidence academia has vigorously suppressed.

                            Read more in my new essay. 👇

                            Link Preview Image
                            What does ‘time immemorial’ really mean? - High Country News

                            If you’ve seen the phrase time immemorial used repeatedly in Indigenous affairs reporting, there are some compelling reasons why.

                            favicon

                            High Country News (www.hcn.org)

                            Brian VastagB This user is from outside of this forum
                            Brian VastagB This user is from outside of this forum
                            Brian Vastag
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            @Toastie I appreciate you writing this. One of my thoughts is that my science journalism colleagues have been leaning on Clovis-first as a storytelling crutch for about...oh 30 years. Meaning it's very easy to repeat: "Archaeologists have long held that humans first arrived in the Americas 12,000 years ago, but new finds challenge that..."

                            There's so much pre-Clovis evidence now that it's time to retire that line. And I think younger archaeologists are more in tune with your view. 1/2

                            Brian VastagB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Brian VastagB Brian Vastag

                              @Toastie I appreciate you writing this. One of my thoughts is that my science journalism colleagues have been leaning on Clovis-first as a storytelling crutch for about...oh 30 years. Meaning it's very easy to repeat: "Archaeologists have long held that humans first arrived in the Americas 12,000 years ago, but new finds challenge that..."

                              There's so much pre-Clovis evidence now that it's time to retire that line. And I think younger archaeologists are more in tune with your view. 1/2

                              Brian VastagB This user is from outside of this forum
                              Brian VastagB This user is from outside of this forum
                              Brian Vastag
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              @Toastie I did several stories about pre-Clovis sites and found many researchers open to the evidence. There are certainly old, curmudgeonly Clovis-firsters who will never change but you've maybe heard the adage about how scientific dogma advances....one death at a time.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ToastieT Toastie

                                Schools have long taught that humans populated North America around 12K yrs ago by crossing the Bering land bridge. This story supports settler colonialism, and contradicts #Indigenous stories, which offer memories of human habitation here during the last glacial maximum.

                                Also, the Bering land bridge story falls apart when you find out about the century of archaeological evidence academia has vigorously suppressed.

                                Read more in my new essay. 👇

                                Link Preview Image
                                What does ‘time immemorial’ really mean? - High Country News

                                If you’ve seen the phrase time immemorial used repeatedly in Indigenous affairs reporting, there are some compelling reasons why.

                                favicon

                                High Country News (www.hcn.org)

                                disorderlyfD This user is from outside of this forum
                                disorderlyfD This user is from outside of this forum
                                disorderlyf
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                @Toastie Funnily enough, I noticed linguistic similarities between certain East Asian languages and the one indigenous language I have any knowledge about. It seems odd there would be more linguistic similarities with peoples that would've come from thousands of miles away from the Bering Strait

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ToastieT Toastie

                                  Schools have long taught that humans populated North America around 12K yrs ago by crossing the Bering land bridge. This story supports settler colonialism, and contradicts #Indigenous stories, which offer memories of human habitation here during the last glacial maximum.

                                  Also, the Bering land bridge story falls apart when you find out about the century of archaeological evidence academia has vigorously suppressed.

                                  Read more in my new essay. 👇

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  What does ‘time immemorial’ really mean? - High Country News

                                  If you’ve seen the phrase time immemorial used repeatedly in Indigenous affairs reporting, there are some compelling reasons why.

                                  favicon

                                  High Country News (www.hcn.org)

                                  Malus is here nowM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Malus is here nowM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Malus is here now
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @Toastie
                                  i really don't know enough about anthropology or history to say anything insightful but there is something mind-boggling to me (white, settler) in an oral history covering multiple tens of thousands of years. it would not surprise me at all if one of the reasons white scientists/anthropologists still hang onto the bering strait theory is being unable to contend with what that really means. like, just rejecting the idea because they can't envision it.

                                  i don't think the white/colonizer frame of mind can handle the concept of being connected to a place for that long- for having a living history that goes that far back, ESPECIALLY for those of us in the americas where we've only been here a hair over 500 years- with most of us only getting here in the past hundred years or so.

                                  (hopefully this is coherent. late-night posting)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Jürgen HubertJ Jürgen Hubert shared this topic on
                                  • ToastieT Toastie

                                    Schools have long taught that humans populated North America around 12K yrs ago by crossing the Bering land bridge. This story supports settler colonialism, and contradicts #Indigenous stories, which offer memories of human habitation here during the last glacial maximum.

                                    Also, the Bering land bridge story falls apart when you find out about the century of archaeological evidence academia has vigorously suppressed.

                                    Read more in my new essay. 👇

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    What does ‘time immemorial’ really mean? - High Country News

                                    If you’ve seen the phrase time immemorial used repeatedly in Indigenous affairs reporting, there are some compelling reasons why.

                                    favicon

                                    High Country News (www.hcn.org)

                                    AudunA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    AudunA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Audun
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @Toastie while this is very interesting, I don't understand how the 12k yrs ago story supports settler colonialism. Do people really argue that way?

                                    That people who arrived 12k years are "just another batch of recent arrivals who kill everything in sight" doesn't make sense. Northern Scandinavia was populated about 12k years ago, so by European standards it is not recent in any way.

                                    Of course, that's on the people who make such claims, but it is a very odd argument, regardless of whether North America was populated 50k years ago or "just" 12k years ago.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ToastieT Toastie

                                      Schools have long taught that humans populated North America around 12K yrs ago by crossing the Bering land bridge. This story supports settler colonialism, and contradicts #Indigenous stories, which offer memories of human habitation here during the last glacial maximum.

                                      Also, the Bering land bridge story falls apart when you find out about the century of archaeological evidence academia has vigorously suppressed.

                                      Read more in my new essay. 👇

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      What does ‘time immemorial’ really mean? - High Country News

                                      If you’ve seen the phrase time immemorial used repeatedly in Indigenous affairs reporting, there are some compelling reasons why.

                                      favicon

                                      High Country News (www.hcn.org)

                                      Germán A. Quimbayo RuizG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Germán A. Quimbayo RuizG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Germán A. Quimbayo Ruiz
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      @Toastie Nice essay, thanks. This reminds me, of course, the Chiribiquete findings in the Colombian Amazon. https://rtvcplay.co/peliculas-documentales/chiribiquete-un-viaje-a-la-memoria-ancestral-de-america

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Brandon WebsterB Brandon Webster shared this topic on

                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      • First post
                                        Last post