I couldn't believe that PC Gamer headline was a proper reflection of what was said, but... it was
-
I couldn't believe that PC Gamer headline was a proper reflection of what was said, but... it was.
The thing which most annoys me is that they seem to believe they have a right to do a damaging thing (which they acknowledge is damaging) in the hope that they might find something impactful to do with it (which they acknowledge they haven't, yet) because there's currently a lot of hype about it, and the only time limit on this is "find something before the hype runs out".
@sil there are always better words than "impactful."
-
I couldn't believe that PC Gamer headline was a proper reflection of what was said, but... it was.
The thing which most annoys me is that they seem to believe they have a right to do a damaging thing (which they acknowledge is damaging) in the hope that they might find something impactful to do with it (which they acknowledge they haven't, yet) because there's currently a lot of hype about it, and the only time limit on this is "find something before the hype runs out".@sil if AI were anything like a "cognitive amplifier" then how did Satya end up in this position? Wouldn't his amplified cognition provide him with all the ideas he needs??
-
I couldn't believe that PC Gamer headline was a proper reflection of what was said, but... it was.
The thing which most annoys me is that they seem to believe they have a right to do a damaging thing (which they acknowledge is damaging) in the hope that they might find something impactful to do with it (which they acknowledge they haven't, yet) because there's currently a lot of hype about it, and the only time limit on this is "find something before the hype runs out".@sil It's funny watching them try to come up with shit to tell us they think we might believe. It's like they ran out of ideas. We just let them get so stupid with it they have nowhere to go. Maybe there actually is a bottom?
-
I couldn't believe that PC Gamer headline was a proper reflection of what was said, but... it was.
The thing which most annoys me is that they seem to believe they have a right to do a damaging thing (which they acknowledge is damaging) in the hope that they might find something impactful to do with it (which they acknowledge they haven't, yet) because there's currently a lot of hype about it, and the only time limit on this is "find something before the hype runs out".Nadella: it's only a bubble if tech company partnerships and infrastructure spending are all there is to it
Microsoft CEO warns that we must 'do something useful' with AI or they'll lose 'social permission' to burn electricity on it
Workers should learn AI skills and companies should use it because it's a "cognitive amplifier," claims Satya Nadella.
PC Gamer (www.pcgamer.com)
-
@sil if AI were anything like a "cognitive amplifier" then how did Satya end up in this position? Wouldn't his amplified cognition provide him with all the ideas he needs??
"AI, find me all the ways to get blood out of this stone"
-
"AI, find me all the ways to get blood out of this stone"
@thevhswizard @sil "Sure, here's a short video no one likes, to put on a platform filled with hate and rage, in order to feel _anything_ while society collapses! Oh, I also had to accelerate climate collapse just a little bit to do it. You're welcome!
""Can I help reinforce your psychosis now? Or would you like me to ask you again soon?"
-
I couldn't believe that PC Gamer headline was a proper reflection of what was said, but... it was.
The thing which most annoys me is that they seem to believe they have a right to do a damaging thing (which they acknowledge is damaging) in the hope that they might find something impactful to do with it (which they acknowledge they haven't, yet) because there's currently a lot of hype about it, and the only time limit on this is "find something before the hype runs out".OH you little darling, you are SO close to seeing something beautiful that you don't want to see
-
I couldn't believe that PC Gamer headline was a proper reflection of what was said, but... it was.
The thing which most annoys me is that they seem to believe they have a right to do a damaging thing (which they acknowledge is damaging) in the hope that they might find something impactful to do with it (which they acknowledge they haven't, yet) because there's currently a lot of hype about it, and the only time limit on this is "find something before the hype runs out".@sil
I don't recall ever giving permission? -
I couldn't believe that PC Gamer headline was a proper reflection of what was said, but... it was.
The thing which most annoys me is that they seem to believe they have a right to do a damaging thing (which they acknowledge is damaging) in the hope that they might find something impactful to do with it (which they acknowledge they haven't, yet) because there's currently a lot of hype about it, and the only time limit on this is "find something before the hype runs out".@sil so generating AI slop, filling the internet with misinformation and damaging creative industries wasn't the goal?....
-
I couldn't believe that PC Gamer headline was a proper reflection of what was said, but... it was.
The thing which most annoys me is that they seem to believe they have a right to do a damaging thing (which they acknowledge is damaging) in the hope that they might find something impactful to do with it (which they acknowledge they haven't, yet) because there's currently a lot of hype about it, and the only time limit on this is "find something before the hype runs out".@sil The WEF meeting in Davos was always a gathering of pompous fools congratulating each other on how charitable they were in their destruction of the planet and the social contract. But now the wheels are falling off this clown car. Regular non-mastodonian people are starting to see that "AI" and accelerated environmental exploitation are a disaster for all of us.
-
I couldn't believe that PC Gamer headline was a proper reflection of what was said, but... it was.
The thing which most annoys me is that they seem to believe they have a right to do a damaging thing (which they acknowledge is damaging) in the hope that they might find something impactful to do with it (which they acknowledge they haven't, yet) because there's currently a lot of hype about it, and the only time limit on this is "find something before the hype runs out".@sil It's also telling that they interpret silence as assent. They have "social permission" because there is not evidence of widespread protest.
They act - if we don't react, they assume we agree. -
P Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary shared this topic
