Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. World
  3. Ed Zitron's a fantastic journalist, capable of turning a close read of AI companies' balance-sheets into an incandescent, exquisitely informed, eye-wateringly profane rant:

Ed Zitron's a fantastic journalist, capable of turning a close read of AI companies' balance-sheets into an incandescent, exquisitely informed, eye-wateringly profane rant:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World
58 Posts 16 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

    Reducing "teaching writing" to "statistical comparisons with another writer's published work" is another way of saying "go fuck yourself" - not to the writers whose identities that Grammarly has hijacked, but to the customers they are tricking into using this terrible, substandard, damaging product.

    Preying on aspiring writers is a grift as old as the publishing industry.

    31/

    Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
    Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
    Cory Doctorow
    wrote last edited by
    #32

    The world is full of dirtbag "story doctors," vanity presses, fake literary agents and other flimflam artists who exploit people's natural desire to be understood to steal from them:

    Link Preview Image
    Writer Beware

    Shining a small, bright light in a wilderness of writing scams

    favicon

    Writer Beware (writerbeware.blog)

    Grammarly is yet another company for whom "AI" is just a way to lower quality in the hopes of lowering expectations. For Grammarly, helping writers with their prose is an irritating adjunct to the company's main business of separating marks from their money.

    32/

    Cory DoctorowP 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

      The world is full of dirtbag "story doctors," vanity presses, fake literary agents and other flimflam artists who exploit people's natural desire to be understood to steal from them:

      Link Preview Image
      Writer Beware

      Shining a small, bright light in a wilderness of writing scams

      favicon

      Writer Beware (writerbeware.blog)

      Grammarly is yet another company for whom "AI" is just a way to lower quality in the hopes of lowering expectations. For Grammarly, helping writers with their prose is an irritating adjunct to the company's main business of separating marks from their money.

      32/

      Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
      Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
      Cory Doctorow
      wrote last edited by
      #33

      In business theory, the perfect firm is one that charges infinity for its products and pays zero for its inputs (you know, "scholarly publishing"). For bosses, AI is a way to shift their firm towards this ideal.

      In this regard, AI is connected to the long tradition of capitalist innovation, in which new production efficiencies are used to increase quantity at the expense of quality.

      33/

      Cory DoctorowP KichaeK 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

        In business theory, the perfect firm is one that charges infinity for its products and pays zero for its inputs (you know, "scholarly publishing"). For bosses, AI is a way to shift their firm towards this ideal.

        In this regard, AI is connected to the long tradition of capitalist innovation, in which new production efficiencies are used to increase quantity at the expense of quality.

        33/

        Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
        Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
        Cory Doctorow
        wrote last edited by
        #34

        This has been true since the Luddite uprising, in which skilled technical workers who cared deeply about the textiles they produced using complex machines railed against a new kind of machine that produced manifestly *lower quality* fabric in much higher volumes:

        Link Preview Image
        Pluralistic: Brian Merchant’s “Blood In the Machine” (26 Sep 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

        favicon

        (pluralistic.net)

        It's not hard to find credible, skilled people who have stories about using AI to make their work better.

        34/

        Cory DoctorowP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

          This has been true since the Luddite uprising, in which skilled technical workers who cared deeply about the textiles they produced using complex machines railed against a new kind of machine that produced manifestly *lower quality* fabric in much higher volumes:

          Link Preview Image
          Pluralistic: Brian Merchant’s “Blood In the Machine” (26 Sep 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

          favicon

          (pluralistic.net)

          It's not hard to find credible, skilled people who have stories about using AI to make their work better.

          34/

          Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
          Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
          Cory Doctorow
          wrote last edited by
          #35

          Elsewhere, I've called these people "centaurs" - human beings who are assisted by machines. These people are embracing the socialist mode of automation: they are using automation to improve *quality*, not *quantity*.

          Whenever you hear a skilled practitioner talk about how they are able to hand off a time-consuming, low-value, low-judgment task to a model so they can focus on the part that means the most to them, you are talking to a centaur.

          35/

          Cory DoctorowP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

            Elsewhere, I've called these people "centaurs" - human beings who are assisted by machines. These people are embracing the socialist mode of automation: they are using automation to improve *quality*, not *quantity*.

            Whenever you hear a skilled practitioner talk about how they are able to hand off a time-consuming, low-value, low-judgment task to a model so they can focus on the part that means the most to them, you are talking to a centaur.

            35/

            Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
            Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
            Cory Doctorow
            wrote last edited by
            #36

            Of course, it's possible for skilled practitioners to produce bad work - some of my favorite writers have published some very bad books indeed - but that isn't a function of automation, that's just human fallibility.

            A reverse centaur (a person conscripted to act as a peripheral to a machine) is trapped by the capitalist mode of automation: quantity over quality.

            36/

            Cory DoctorowP 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

              Of course, it's possible for skilled practitioners to produce bad work - some of my favorite writers have published some very bad books indeed - but that isn't a function of automation, that's just human fallibility.

              A reverse centaur (a person conscripted to act as a peripheral to a machine) is trapped by the capitalist mode of automation: quantity over quality.

              36/

              Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
              Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
              Cory Doctorow
              wrote last edited by
              #37

              Machines work faster and longer than humans, and the faster and harder a human can be made to work, the closer the firm can come to the ideal of paying zero for its inputs.

              A reverse centaur works for a machine that is set to run at the absolute limit of its human peripheral's capability and endurance. A reverse centaur is expected to produce with the mechanical regularity of a machine, catching every mistake the machine makes.

              37/

              Cory DoctorowP D 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

                Machines work faster and longer than humans, and the faster and harder a human can be made to work, the closer the firm can come to the ideal of paying zero for its inputs.

                A reverse centaur works for a machine that is set to run at the absolute limit of its human peripheral's capability and endurance. A reverse centaur is expected to produce with the mechanical regularity of a machine, catching every mistake the machine makes.

                37/

                Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
                Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
                Cory Doctorow
                wrote last edited by
                #38

                A reverse centaur is the machine's accountability sink and moral crumple-zone:

                Link Preview Image
                Moral Crumple Zones: Cautionary Tales in Human-Robot Interaction | Engaging Science, Technology, and Society

                favicon

                (estsjournal.org)

                AI is a normal technology, just another set of automation tools that have some uses for some users. The thing that makes AI signify "go fuck yourself" isn't some intrinsic factor of large language models or transformers. It's the capitalist mode of automation, increasing quantity at the expense of quality.

                38/

                Cory DoctorowP JWcph, Radicalized By DecencyJ 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

                  A reverse centaur is the machine's accountability sink and moral crumple-zone:

                  Link Preview Image
                  Moral Crumple Zones: Cautionary Tales in Human-Robot Interaction | Engaging Science, Technology, and Society

                  favicon

                  (estsjournal.org)

                  AI is a normal technology, just another set of automation tools that have some uses for some users. The thing that makes AI signify "go fuck yourself" isn't some intrinsic factor of large language models or transformers. It's the capitalist mode of automation, increasing quantity at the expense of quality.

                  38/

                  Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
                  Cory DoctorowP This user is from outside of this forum
                  Cory Doctorow
                  wrote last edited by
                  #39

                  Automation doesn't *have* to be a way to reduce expectations in the hopes of selling worse things for more money - but without some form of external constraint (unions, regulation, competition), that is inevitably how companies will wield *any* automation, including and especially AI.

                  eof/

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

                    Normally the "digital divide" refers to *access* to technology, but as access becomes less and less of an issue, the real divide is between people who know how to defend themselves from the cruel indifference of technology designers and people who are helpless before their enshittificatory gambits.

                    5/

                    Kevin Karhan :verified:K This user is from outside of this forum
                    Kevin Karhan :verified:K This user is from outside of this forum
                    Kevin Karhan :verified:
                    wrote last edited by
                    #40

                    @pluralistic thus I coined the term "#TechLiteracy" (or lack thereof as "#TechIlliteracy").

                    • As this is a more fitting term to differenciate between "us" #TechLiterates (who know how to setup some lightweight #Linux distro and make it work (not just for us bot others) and those who believe the #Enshittification, #bloat and crap is "a fact of life" (aka. "#TechIlliterates")…
                      • Just like #literacy enables people to learn, interact and communicate, the same applies to using #technology and #media (see "#MediaLiteracy")…

                    Thus I see it as both moral and social duty to spread "Tech-Literacy" among society because decades of #illiteracy in #tech are now paying dividends and #Cyberfascists actively work on sabotaging and destroying #HumanRights and #CivilRights under #FalsePretenses lile "#YouthProtection" (see "#AgeVerification")…

                    lemgandiL 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

                      Zitron's stunt stuck with me because it's so simple and so apt. Every tech designer should be forced to use a stock configuration Acer Aspire 1 for a minimum of three hours/day, just as every aviation CEO should be required to fly basic coach at least one out of three flights (and one of two long-haul flights).

                      6/

                      Kevin Karhan :verified:K This user is from outside of this forum
                      Kevin Karhan :verified:K This user is from outside of this forum
                      Kevin Karhan :verified:
                      wrote last edited by
                      #41

                      @pluralistic IMHO politicans should be forced to exclusively use #PublicTransport 2nd if not 3rd class so they get to "#TouchGrass" (or rather "#TouchBase" with their constituents).

                      Same with #tech, really…

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

                        To that, I will add: every news executive should be forced to consume the news in a stock browser with no adblock, no accessibility plugins, no Reader View, none of the add-ons that make reading the web bearable:

                        Link Preview Image
                        Pluralistic: The web is bearable with RSS (07 Mar 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                        favicon

                        (pluralistic.net)

                        But in all honesty, I fear this would not make much of a difference, because I suspect that the people who oversee the design of modern news sites *don't care about the news at all*.

                        7/

                        Kevin Karhan :verified:K This user is from outside of this forum
                        Kevin Karhan :verified:K This user is from outside of this forum
                        Kevin Karhan :verified:
                        wrote last edited by
                        #42

                        @pluralistic OFC they don't!

                        And even then they too are just as #TechIlliterate and #MediaIlliterate as their customers!
                        https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/116212547656181822

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Kevin Karhan :verified:K Kevin Karhan :verified:

                          @pluralistic thus I coined the term "#TechLiteracy" (or lack thereof as "#TechIlliteracy").

                          • As this is a more fitting term to differenciate between "us" #TechLiterates (who know how to setup some lightweight #Linux distro and make it work (not just for us bot others) and those who believe the #Enshittification, #bloat and crap is "a fact of life" (aka. "#TechIlliterates")…
                            • Just like #literacy enables people to learn, interact and communicate, the same applies to using #technology and #media (see "#MediaLiteracy")…

                          Thus I see it as both moral and social duty to spread "Tech-Literacy" among society because decades of #illiteracy in #tech are now paying dividends and #Cyberfascists actively work on sabotaging and destroying #HumanRights and #CivilRights under #FalsePretenses lile "#YouthProtection" (see "#AgeVerification")…

                          lemgandiL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lemgandiL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lemgandi
                          wrote last edited by
                          #43

                          @kkarhan @pluralistic

                          First step in Tech Literacy: use a password manager. Use A Password Manager. USE A PAASWORD MANAGER.

                          Kevin Karhan :verified:K 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • lemgandiL lemgandi

                            @kkarhan @pluralistic

                            First step in Tech Literacy: use a password manager. Use A Password Manager. USE A PAASWORD MANAGER.

                            Kevin Karhan :verified:K This user is from outside of this forum
                            Kevin Karhan :verified:K This user is from outside of this forum
                            Kevin Karhan :verified:
                            wrote last edited by
                            #44

                            @lemgandi @pluralistic OFC!

                            And then go to a @cryptoparty@mastodon.earth / @cryptoparty@chaos.social / #CryptoParty and learn the basics on how to get started with @tails_live / @tails / #Tails and @torproject / #TorBrowser and all the other things…

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

                              Machines work faster and longer than humans, and the faster and harder a human can be made to work, the closer the firm can come to the ideal of paying zero for its inputs.

                              A reverse centaur works for a machine that is set to run at the absolute limit of its human peripheral's capability and endurance. A reverse centaur is expected to produce with the mechanical regularity of a machine, catching every mistake the machine makes.

                              37/

                              D This user is from outside of this forum
                              D This user is from outside of this forum
                              Darker Knight
                              wrote last edited by
                              #45

                              @pluralistic

                              All that to achieve ... what?

                              Cheaper mass goods for a now dying out human populace that no longer want them, because the machinery that produced the goods so efficiently was alsol killing the very ecological balance that the consumer (human) species needed to be alive on.

                              Stupid of what?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

                                That's "Ed, the financial sleuth." But Ed has another persona, one we don't get nearly enough of, which I delight in: "Ed the stunt journalist." For example, in 2024, Ed bought Amazon's bestselling laptop, "a $238 Acer Aspire 1 with a four-year-old Celeron N4500 Processor, 4GB of DDR4 RAM, and 128GB of slow eMMC storage" and wrote about the experience of using the internet with this popular, terrible machine:

                                Link Preview Image
                                Never Forgive Them

                                In the last year, I’ve spent about 200,000 words on a kind of personal journey where I’ve tried again and again to work out why everything digital feels so broken, and why it seems to keep getting worse, despite what tech’s “brightest” minds might promise. More

                                favicon

                                Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At (www.wheresyoured.at)

                                2/

                                eLearningTechieE This user is from outside of this forum
                                eLearningTechieE This user is from outside of this forum
                                eLearningTechie
                                wrote last edited by
                                #46

                                @pluralistic "stunt journalist" 🤣
                                Nice!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

                                  Even if you want to write a pastiche in the style of some writer you admire (or want to send up), word choices and sentence structure are only incidental to capturing that writer's style. To reduce "style" to "stylometry" is to commit the cardinal sin of technical analysis: namely, incinerating all the squishy qualitative aspects that can't be readily fed into a model and doing math on the resulting dubious quantitative residue:

                                  favicon

                                  (locusmag.com)

                                  27/

                                  malteM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  malteM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  malte
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #47

                                  @pluralistic One my favorite writers on the epistemology of aesthetics, Graham Harman, defines style as precisely that which you *cannot* turn into a protocol of if-then rules (which would make it a parody)

                                  #ooo

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

                                    Ed Zitron's a fantastic journalist, capable of turning a close read of AI companies' balance-sheets into an incandescent, exquisitely informed, eye-wateringly profane rant:

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    The AI Bubble Is An Information War

                                    Editor's Note: Apologies if you received this email twice - we had an issue with our mail server that meant it was hitting spam in many cases! Hi! If you like this piece and want to support my work, please subscribe to my premium newsletter. It’s $70 a year,

                                    favicon

                                    Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At (www.wheresyoured.at)

                                    --

                                    If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Pluralistic: AI “journalists” prove that media bosses don’t give a shit (11 Mar 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                                    favicon

                                    (pluralistic.net)

                                    1/

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Fitz BushnellF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Fitz BushnellF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Fitz Bushnell
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #48

                                    @pluralistic Do you think Zitron's "midwit" is smarter than a dimwit? That's the way I read it. Clearly not praise, either way.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Cory DoctorowP Cory Doctorow

                                      Ed Zitron's a fantastic journalist, capable of turning a close read of AI companies' balance-sheets into an incandescent, exquisitely informed, eye-wateringly profane rant:

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      The AI Bubble Is An Information War

                                      Editor's Note: Apologies if you received this email twice - we had an issue with our mail server that meant it was hitting spam in many cases! Hi! If you like this piece and want to support my work, please subscribe to my premium newsletter. It’s $70 a year,

                                      favicon

                                      Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At (www.wheresyoured.at)

                                      --

                                      If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Pluralistic: AI “journalists” prove that media bosses don’t give a shit (11 Mar 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                                      favicon

                                      (pluralistic.net)

                                      1/

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Fitz BushnellF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Fitz BushnellF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Fitz Bushnell
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #49

                                      @pluralistic
                                      "For these AI boosters, the point isn't to create an AI that can do the work as well as a person – it's to condition the world to accept the lower-quality work that will come from a chatbot."

                                      It's like "you get what you pay for" is being used as justification for terrible quality, instead of warning people away from suspiciously-cheap products.

                                      707Kat7 The WookieN BritstralianN Domestic Supply :verified:D Jeff McNeillJ 5 Replies Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary shared this topic
                                      • Fitz BushnellF Fitz Bushnell

                                        @pluralistic
                                        "For these AI boosters, the point isn't to create an AI that can do the work as well as a person – it's to condition the world to accept the lower-quality work that will come from a chatbot."

                                        It's like "you get what you pay for" is being used as justification for terrible quality, instead of warning people away from suspiciously-cheap products.

                                        707Kat7 This user is from outside of this forum
                                        707Kat7 This user is from outside of this forum
                                        707Kat
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #50

                                        @fitzscott Oh, the products won't be cheaper. Only the quality. The savings, if there will be any - which there won't - will go to shareholders and CEO payments.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Fitz BushnellF Fitz Bushnell

                                          @pluralistic
                                          "For these AI boosters, the point isn't to create an AI that can do the work as well as a person – it's to condition the world to accept the lower-quality work that will come from a chatbot."

                                          It's like "you get what you pay for" is being used as justification for terrible quality, instead of warning people away from suspiciously-cheap products.

                                          The WookieN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          The WookieN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          The Wookie
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #51

                                          @fitzscott @pluralistic

                                          You get what you pay for but instead of a cheap tshirt that shrinks the first time you wash it it’s the life threatening medical advice you get from the AI chat bot that your insurance company replaced human psychologists with or the AI financial planner that advises you to bet all your retirement savings on red at the roulette table.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post