Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. First Shape Found That Can’t Pass Through Itself | Quanta Magazine

First Shape Found That Can’t Pass Through Itself | Quanta Magazine

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
science
4 Posts 3 Posters 29 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C This user is from outside of this forum
    C This user is from outside of this forum
    cm0002@lemmings.world
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    In a breakthrough announced in October 2025, mathematicians Jakob Steininger and Sergey Yurkevich discovered the first shape proven to lack the “Rupert property” - meaning it cannot have a straight tunnel bored through it large enough for an identical copy to pass through[^1].

    Named the “Noperthedron,” this 90-vertex, 152-face shape disproved a centuries-old conjecture that all convex polyhedra would have this pass-through property, first demonstrated by Prince Rupert with a cube in the 1600s[^1].

    The proof combined theoretical advances with massive computer calculations, examining approximately 18 million possible orientations. “It’s a miracle that it works,” said Steininger, who developed the proof with Yurkevich while both worked in Austria[^1].

    This resolved a geometry problem dating back to Prince Rupert’s royal bet that one cube couldn’t pass through another. While Rupert won that bet, and mathematicians later proved many complex shapes could have pass-through tunnels, the Noperthedron finally provided the first counterexample[^1].

    [^1]: First Shape Found That Can’t Pass Through Itself | Quanta Magazine

    Link Preview Image
    First Shape Found That Can’t Pass Through Itself | Quanta Magazine

    After more than three centuries, a geometry problem that originated with a royal bet has been solved.

    favicon

    Quanta Magazine (www.quantamagazine.org)

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    4
    • ScienceS Science shared this topic on
    • C cm0002@lemmings.world

      In a breakthrough announced in October 2025, mathematicians Jakob Steininger and Sergey Yurkevich discovered the first shape proven to lack the “Rupert property” - meaning it cannot have a straight tunnel bored through it large enough for an identical copy to pass through[^1].

      Named the “Noperthedron,” this 90-vertex, 152-face shape disproved a centuries-old conjecture that all convex polyhedra would have this pass-through property, first demonstrated by Prince Rupert with a cube in the 1600s[^1].

      The proof combined theoretical advances with massive computer calculations, examining approximately 18 million possible orientations. “It’s a miracle that it works,” said Steininger, who developed the proof with Yurkevich while both worked in Austria[^1].

      This resolved a geometry problem dating back to Prince Rupert’s royal bet that one cube couldn’t pass through another. While Rupert won that bet, and mathematicians later proved many complex shapes could have pass-through tunnels, the Noperthedron finally provided the first counterexample[^1].

      [^1]: First Shape Found That Can’t Pass Through Itself | Quanta Magazine

      Link Preview Image
      First Shape Found That Can’t Pass Through Itself | Quanta Magazine

      After more than three centuries, a geometry problem that originated with a royal bet has been solved.

      favicon

      Quanta Magazine (www.quantamagazine.org)

      J This user is from outside of this forum
      J This user is from outside of this forum
      jacksilver@lemmy.world
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I read through this and something I couldn’t quite understand is - is a sphere able to “pass through” itself. If not then that seems like a baseline proof that such objects exist, then the question is “are there any convex polygons”.

      adaA 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • J jacksilver@lemmy.world

        I read through this and something I couldn’t quite understand is - is a sphere able to “pass through” itself. If not then that seems like a baseline proof that such objects exist, then the question is “are there any convex polygons”.

        adaA This user is from outside of this forum
        adaA This user is from outside of this forum
        ada
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        The property is (was) specific to convex polyhedrons.

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        3
        • adaA ada

          The property is (was) specific to convex polyhedrons.

          J This user is from outside of this forum
          J This user is from outside of this forum
          jacksilver@lemmy.world
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Ahh I overlooked the “polyhedron” part. Thanks!

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0

          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post