Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Carney to brief premiers on plan to fast-track major nation-building projects

Carney to brief premiers on plan to fast-track major nation-building projects

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
19 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C compactflax@discuss.tchncs.de

    I use a lot of fossil fuels and t think they’re going to last longer than some government goals suggest, but I’m not certain that any new pipelines make sense, anywhere in the world. Fix up and maintain the existing ones until they can be mothballed. Maybe there’s an argument to be made that exiting fossil fuels leaves market for other countries, or something, but investing heavily in a technology that we know for certain is hurting humanity’s chances of survival doesn’t seem bright.

    F This user is from outside of this forum
    F This user is from outside of this forum
    fireretardant@lemmy.world
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    I think the current global mindset is fossil fuels won’t be used as much for fuel, but plastics are still booming. The next fossil fuel race will be who can make the most plastic. I can’t say that its better for the planet.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • Cows Look Like MapsC Cows Look Like Maps

      "The proposed legislation would allow the Carney cabinet to make regulations to modify federal regulatory requirements for all projects determined to be in the country’s national interest.

      He said national interest projects will include “pipelines that make sense,” clean energy grids, trade corridors, nuclear facilities, critical minerals and carbon-capture facilities"

      archive.ph

      favicon

      (archive.ph)

      F This user is from outside of this forum
      F This user is from outside of this forum
      fireretardant@lemmy.world
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Hopefully Doug Ford’s highway and highway tunnel don’t make the list but high speed rail does.

      1 Reply Last reply
      8
      • Cows Look Like MapsC Cows Look Like Maps

        "The proposed legislation would allow the Carney cabinet to make regulations to modify federal regulatory requirements for all projects determined to be in the country’s national interest.

        He said national interest projects will include “pipelines that make sense,” clean energy grids, trade corridors, nuclear facilities, critical minerals and carbon-capture facilities"

        archive.ph

        favicon

        (archive.ph)

        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        toastmeister@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Doomberg was saying Carney was going to run for election in order to push pipelines through Quebec for a while now, using a separation crisis to do so. All his predictions seem to be coming true.

        T M 2 Replies Last reply
        1
        • Cows Look Like MapsC Cows Look Like Maps

          "The proposed legislation would allow the Carney cabinet to make regulations to modify federal regulatory requirements for all projects determined to be in the country’s national interest.

          He said national interest projects will include “pipelines that make sense,” clean energy grids, trade corridors, nuclear facilities, critical minerals and carbon-capture facilities"

          archive.ph

          favicon

          (archive.ph)

          driftinglynx@lemmy.caD This user is from outside of this forum
          driftinglynx@lemmy.caD This user is from outside of this forum
          driftinglynx@lemmy.ca
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          I guess it all hinges on which pipelines “make sense”; if none, I approve đŸ€·

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

            Doomberg was saying Carney was going to run for election in order to push pipelines through Quebec for a while now, using a separation crisis to do so. All his predictions seem to be coming true.

            T This user is from outside of this forum
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            tleb@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            What separation crisis? Alberta having a hissy fit over the election is hardly a crisis, and anyway, Quebec doesn’t give a shit. Quebecers themselves do support a pipeline, so I don’t think you can say the government will “push” anything through.

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • Cows Look Like MapsC Cows Look Like Maps

              "The proposed legislation would allow the Carney cabinet to make regulations to modify federal regulatory requirements for all projects determined to be in the country’s national interest.

              He said national interest projects will include “pipelines that make sense,” clean energy grids, trade corridors, nuclear facilities, critical minerals and carbon-capture facilities"

              archive.ph

              favicon

              (archive.ph)

              S This user is from outside of this forum
              S This user is from outside of this forum
              snoons@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              can i has rrrrrreeallly fast train to take me from vancouer to toronto pls thk

              L PyrP acargitzT 3 Replies Last reply
              7
              • M Moose Winooski

                For all his talk about increasing economic productivity in terms of producing more goods, all I see is more resource extraction.

                Carbon capture is a darling of the oil industry that allows them to keep doing business as usual. It requires an insane amount of often unclean electricity and is vapourware that does not work at scale. Oil companies love carbon capture, just like they love “natural gas” that lets them sell biproducts of fracking.

                Nuclear is great but our climate does not have the 10 years it takes to build a reactor.

                Where we’re headed, we’ll end up with more oil output, more emissions, more car-dependency, and a bunch of partially completed projects in 10 years.

                This needs more focus on low carbon public transit and fast and achievable solar and wind.

                It is abundantly clear that even if every automobile was replaced with an EV, we’d still bake our planet. Mining the ring of fire is a profit-seeking, extractive venture and not a climate solution.

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                In order to produce more goods you need the energy infrastructure to support it. The problem is that things take time and a lack of investment over time in various sectors means we will be behind for some time.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T toastmeister@lemmy.ca

                  Doomberg was saying Carney was going to run for election in order to push pipelines through Quebec for a while now, using a separation crisis to do so. All his predictions seem to be coming true.

                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  Moose Winooski
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  You don’t want to be on the opposite side of pissed off MontrĂ©alers. They riot like the French and would fiercely fight any attempts by the feds to force a pipeline on QuĂ©bec. The entire Bloc QuĂ©bĂ©cois would have their back too. Bad idea.

                  Liberals wouldn’t get a seat in Quebec for years


                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Moose Winooski

                    For all his talk about increasing economic productivity in terms of producing more goods, all I see is more resource extraction.

                    Carbon capture is a darling of the oil industry that allows them to keep doing business as usual. It requires an insane amount of often unclean electricity and is vapourware that does not work at scale. Oil companies love carbon capture, just like they love “natural gas” that lets them sell biproducts of fracking.

                    Nuclear is great but our climate does not have the 10 years it takes to build a reactor.

                    Where we’re headed, we’ll end up with more oil output, more emissions, more car-dependency, and a bunch of partially completed projects in 10 years.

                    This needs more focus on low carbon public transit and fast and achievable solar and wind.

                    It is abundantly clear that even if every automobile was replaced with an EV, we’d still bake our planet. Mining the ring of fire is a profit-seeking, extractive venture and not a climate solution.

                    N This user is from outside of this forum
                    N This user is from outside of this forum
                    notmyoldredditname@lemmy.world
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    SMRs should take less than 10 years and the one about to be built will be ready well before that in theory. The problem is they’re so new here that even if it works and everything goes according to plan, it’s probably a couple decades before it’s even begun to scale.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S snoons@lemmy.ca

                      can i has rrrrrreeallly fast train to take me from vancouer to toronto pls thk

                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      lostwon@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      Comfy, smooth, and fast like the shinkansen. đŸ€©

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L lostwon@lemmy.ca

                        Comfy, smooth, and fast like the shinkansen. đŸ€©

                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                        snoons@lemmy.ca
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        maplesen!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S snoons@lemmy.ca

                          can i has rrrrrreeallly fast train to take me from vancouer to toronto pls thk

                          PyrP This user is from outside of this forum
                          PyrP This user is from outside of this forum
                          Pyr
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          Or like, a reasonably quick train that takes me from chilliwack to Vancouver?

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • PyrP Pyr

                            Or like, a reasonably quick train that takes me from chilliwack to Vancouver?

                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            snoons@lemmy.ca
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            a beret train

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S snoons@lemmy.ca

                              can i has rrrrrreeallly fast train to take me from vancouer to toronto pls thk

                              acargitzT This user is from outside of this forum
                              acargitzT This user is from outside of this forum
                              acargitz
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              No sir, “nation building” means pipelines.

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • acargitzT acargitz

                                No sir, “nation building” means pipelines.

                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                shaggysnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                Moving oil from one part of the country to another part of the country. Really makes me feel connected to everyone. /s

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1

                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post