Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Carney agrees to ‘regularize’ communication between Canada and China

Carney agrees to ‘regularize’ communication between Canada and China

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
28 Posts 15 Posters 211 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I ilikeboobies@lemmy.ca

    Yikes, I feel that should bar him from office

    D This user is from outside of this forum
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    daryl@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    Apparently there is no such prohibition in Canada. Even leaders are free to worship according to their faith.

    I 1 Reply Last reply
    9
    • freebooter69@lemmy.caF freebooter69@lemmy.ca

      Communication is fine and cooperation where it is necessary and makes sense, but let’s prioritize CETA and CPTPP countries where trade is concerned.

      D This user is from outside of this forum
      D This user is from outside of this forum
      daryl@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      Let’s do what it takes, and certainly do not let America dictate our trade policies.

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • D daryl@lemmy.ca

        Your opinions would be received much more favorably without the obscenities. They add nothing and turn people off.

        StametsS This user is from outside of this forum
        StametsS This user is from outside of this forum
        Stamets
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        Gaze upon my field of fucks and see that it is barren. The fucktiller idle, the fuckerlizer piled in a corner and the seeds of fuck yet to be sown.

        I genuinely couldn’t care less what you think if you’re going to lecture me over using the word fuck once. This isn’t elementary school in rural Manitoba. This is the Internet.

        1 Reply Last reply
        7
        • D daryl@lemmy.ca

          Apparently there is no such prohibition in Canada. Even leaders are free to worship according to their faith.

          I This user is from outside of this forum
          I This user is from outside of this forum
          ilikeboobies@lemmy.ca
          wrote on last edited by ilikeboobies@lemmy.ca
          #19

          I suppose it’s a matter for the courts to ensure reasonable limits for section 2 of the Charter is upheld

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • D daryl@lemmy.ca

            Your opinions would be received much more favorably without the obscenities. They add nothing and turn people off.

            H This user is from outside of this forum
            H This user is from outside of this forum
            howrar@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #20

            “Fucking” is an intensifier in this sentence. The meaning would slightly change without it.

            StametsS D 2 Replies Last reply
            5
            • I ilikeboobies@lemmy.ca

              Yikes, I feel that should bar him from office

              setVeryLoud(true);I This user is from outside of this forum
              setVeryLoud(true);I This user is from outside of this forum
              setVeryLoud(true);
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              Freedom from religion comes with freedom of religion in Canada.

              He’s conservative, I’m not surprised he’s religious.

              1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • H howrar@lemmy.ca

                “Fucking” is an intensifier in this sentence. The meaning would slightly change without it.

                StametsS This user is from outside of this forum
                StametsS This user is from outside of this forum
                Stamets
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                Fucking thank you

                1 Reply Last reply
                4
                • D daryl@lemmy.ca

                  New Prime Minister, new relationship with China.

                  China’s playbook seems to consistently follow this pattern. If they get in a spat with anther country, the grudge continues until a new state leader comes into play, then all past grievances are reset. Sort of like Union-management - when a new collective agreement is signed, past active grievances tend to be voided.

                  Given that Carney is devout Catholic, we shall see if his dedication to the Pope, given the very tumultuous relationship between the Roman Catholic Pope and China, gets in the way of Good Governance in Canada’s policy decisions towards China.

                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                  Kalvin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  One of my friends is from Canada.

                  sturgist@lemmy.caS 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • K Kalvin

                    One of my friends is from Canada.

                    sturgist@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sturgist@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sturgist@lemmy.ca
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    You wouldn’t know him though, he goes to a different school…

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • H howrar@lemmy.ca

                      “Fucking” is an intensifier in this sentence. The meaning would slightly change without it.

                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                      daryl@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      It is not an ‘intensifier’, it is just obnoxious. The purpose is not to enhance any meaning, but to ‘dominate’ over the reader. The word is used in an ‘adversarial’ context - an insult and a challenge to the reader. It is symbolic of the general anger that we see so commonly today, and I submit it is a direct cause if that anger. The demise of American civilility is completely mapped on to the curve for the use of these obnoxious, angry, combative vulgar terms in the common vernacular.

                      ArxCyberwolfS StametsS 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • D daryl@lemmy.ca

                        It is not an ‘intensifier’, it is just obnoxious. The purpose is not to enhance any meaning, but to ‘dominate’ over the reader. The word is used in an ‘adversarial’ context - an insult and a challenge to the reader. It is symbolic of the general anger that we see so commonly today, and I submit it is a direct cause if that anger. The demise of American civilility is completely mapped on to the curve for the use of these obnoxious, angry, combative vulgar terms in the common vernacular.

                        ArxCyberwolfS This user is from outside of this forum
                        ArxCyberwolfS This user is from outside of this forum
                        ArxCyberwolf
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        If you can’t handle the word “fuck” then you shouldn’t be online. People are angry, and rightfully so, and should be able to express said anger without being tone policed.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        4
                        • I ilikeboobies@lemmy.ca

                          Given that Carney is devout Catholic,

                          Not while he’s in office

                          But China is a better partner than the US for us right now and we will need them before we can ban trade/travel to the US

                          spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                          spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                          spacecowboy@lemmy.ca
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          We’re not quite to this extreme (yet?) but it’s a similar logic to allying with Stalin when Hitler was around.

                          Trump isn’t Hitler, and Xi isn’t Stalin, but the logic is similar. It’s an ugly thing, Xi is a complete shitbag after all. But Trump is the more immediate threat.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • D daryl@lemmy.ca

                            It is not an ‘intensifier’, it is just obnoxious. The purpose is not to enhance any meaning, but to ‘dominate’ over the reader. The word is used in an ‘adversarial’ context - an insult and a challenge to the reader. It is symbolic of the general anger that we see so commonly today, and I submit it is a direct cause if that anger. The demise of American civilility is completely mapped on to the curve for the use of these obnoxious, angry, combative vulgar terms in the common vernacular.

                            StametsS This user is from outside of this forum
                            StametsS This user is from outside of this forum
                            Stamets
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #28

                            It is just obnoxious

                            Opinion, not fact.

                            The purpose is not to enhance any meaning, but to ‘dominate’ over the reader.

                            Opinion, not fact.

                            The word is used in an ‘adversarial’ context - an insult and a challenge to the reader.

                            Opinion, not fact.

                            It is symbolic of the general anger that we see so commonly today

                            Opinion, not fact

                            and I submit it is a direct cause if that anger

                            Of that anger. Oh yeah, and opinion. Not fact.

                            The demise of American civility is completely mapped onto the curve for the use of these obnoxious, angry, combative vulgar terms in the common vernacular.

                            First, opinion and not fact. Second, I’m Newfie. We swear like sailors because we are sailors. Third, human history is filled with profanity and vulgarity. So unless you want to try and argue that profanity was what caused Vesuvius to explode, you don’t really have a leg to stand on here.

                            Once again. This is not a rural elementary school. I do not owe it to you to not swear. You owe it to yourself to conduct yourself like an adult and avoid what you do not like. Preaching to people and trying to insist your opinion is objective truth will do you zero favors in any part of your life. You should probably knock that off.

                            Personally, I’d argue that people who insist their own beliefs are universal truth are the people who brought down the United States and every other major power in human history. You know, because that is actually what happened and there is documented evidence of. Not “Swearing collapses a countries civility.”

                            I’d say you don’t have a leg to stand on but that’s obvious to anyone looking at this conversation. All they see is me standing in a fuckfield that is barren and you leaning up against a collapsing fence.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1

                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post