Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Carney's spending promises will require 'significant cuts' to the public service: PBO

Carney's spending promises will require 'significant cuts' to the public service: PBO

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
18 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I implyingimplications@lemmy.ca

    The headline is misleading because the Ottawa Citizen is owned by conservative fanboys, PostMedia. Carney promised a balanced budget but his budget guy said that’s not going to happen since making good on his campaign promises is more costly than initially expected and balancing would require a budget cut. They’re not doing that. That’s just taken out of context for the headline.

    But in an interview, Giroux said that the promise of a cap on the public service will not be enough to mitigate Carney’s additional spending. He said he expects higher deficits, and as a result, higher debt servicing charges over the next few years.

    Emphasis mine.

    “To balance or to pay for these types of additional spending there would need to be severe cuts to the public service, significant cuts,” Giroux said.

    There would need to be cuts to balance the budget. That’s why they’re not going to balance the budget.

    P This user is from outside of this forum
    P This user is from outside of this forum
    patatas@sh.itjust.works
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    From the Toronto Star:

    Hike in defence spending could mean cuts in other areas, Mark Carney warns

    Link Preview Image
    Hike in defence spending could mean cuts in other areas, Mark Carney warns

    Prime Minister Mark Carney hailed a new and aggressive NATO target to boost military spending, while acknowledging that other areas might get cut back.

    favicon

    Toronto Star (www.thestar.com)

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • C cm0002@lemmy.world
      This post did not contain any content.
      403 Forbidden

      favicon

      (ottawacitizen.com)

      R This user is from outside of this forum
      R This user is from outside of this forum
      rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Is that to pay for military and arming race?

      1 Reply Last reply
      4
      • A assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works

        The only other newspaper running this story is the Toronto Star… also US owned by the same company.

        P This user is from outside of this forum
        P This user is from outside of this forum
        patatas@sh.itjust.works
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Most recent ownership info I can find is that the Star is owned by Torstar Corporation, which is owned by NordStar Capital.

        Canadian company, and not Postmedia. Is this not still true?

        A W 3 Replies Last reply
        2
        • P patatas@sh.itjust.works

          Most recent ownership info I can find is that the Star is owned by Torstar Corporation, which is owned by NordStar Capital.

          Canadian company, and not Postmedia. Is this not still true?

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          I was pretty sure it was the Toronto Star that was Postmedia… I may be remembering incorrectly. I’m gonna delete my comment until I can verify.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • P patatas@sh.itjust.works

            Most recent ownership info I can find is that the Star is owned by Torstar Corporation, which is owned by NordStar Capital.

            Canadian company, and not Postmedia. Is this not still true?

            A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            Postmedia has a bunch of “* Star” papers and the Toronto Sun but notably not the Toronto Star.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • P patatas@sh.itjust.works

              Most recent ownership info I can find is that the Star is owned by Torstar Corporation, which is owned by NordStar Capital.

              Canadian company, and not Postmedia. Is this not still true?

              W This user is from outside of this forum
              W This user is from outside of this forum
              wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              The star went private a few years ago, the new owners broke up and then the sole owner fired the head editor.

              I think it’s still Canadian.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • I implyingimplications@lemmy.ca

                The headline is misleading because the Ottawa Citizen is owned by conservative fanboys, PostMedia. Carney promised a balanced budget but his budget guy said that’s not going to happen since making good on his campaign promises is more costly than initially expected and balancing would require a budget cut. They’re not doing that. That’s just taken out of context for the headline.

                But in an interview, Giroux said that the promise of a cap on the public service will not be enough to mitigate Carney’s additional spending. He said he expects higher deficits, and as a result, higher debt servicing charges over the next few years.

                Emphasis mine.

                “To balance or to pay for these types of additional spending there would need to be severe cuts to the public service, significant cuts,” Giroux said.

                There would need to be cuts to balance the budget. That’s why they’re not going to balance the budget.

                Daniel QuinnD This user is from outside of this forum
                Daniel QuinnD This user is from outside of this forum
                Daniel Quinn
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                “To balance or to pay for these types of additional spending there would need to be severe cuts to the public service, significant cuts,” Giroux said.

                This is a lie.

                It’s worse than a lie really. Behind this claim are two decisions that the Liberals have made in advance so that they can present this with the frame that cuts are “necessary”:

                1. The spending is required, despite not having it in the budget.
                2. The budget may not be increased through taxing the rich.

                In other words, Carney wants a pony and rather than make his rich friends pay for it, he’s going to screw everyone else.

                So yeah, conservatives.

                K 1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  403 Forbidden

                  favicon

                  (ottawacitizen.com)

                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  samuelrjankis@sh.itjust.works
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  This is a bad news source.

                  I’m not saying the article is inaccurate but Postmedia isn’t even worth fact checking. Therefore not worth reading.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  14
                  • W wise_pancake@lemmy.ca

                    The star went private a few years ago, the new owners broke up and then the sole owner fired the head editor.

                    I think it’s still Canadian.

                    G This user is from outside of this forum
                    G This user is from outside of this forum
                    grey_maniac@lemmy.ca
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    Doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a right wing bias and agenda, though. I haven’t read thd Star in decades, so I don’t know. Just pointing out the (probably) painfully obvious (because I have a tendency to do that).

                    W K 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • G grey_maniac@lemmy.ca

                      Doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a right wing bias and agenda, though. I haven’t read thd Star in decades, so I don’t know. Just pointing out the (probably) painfully obvious (because I have a tendency to do that).

                      W This user is from outside of this forum
                      W This user is from outside of this forum
                      wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      From what I remember they were losing a lot of money, so they’ve mostly switched to opinion pieces that are more likely to go viral and drive subscriptions

                      No idea of that changed the bias

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        403 Forbidden

                        favicon

                        (ottawacitizen.com)

                        limprimble@lemmy.caL This user is from outside of this forum
                        limprimble@lemmy.caL This user is from outside of this forum
                        limprimble@lemmy.ca
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        They’re going to avoid public service cuts by taxing the very rich, right?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • G grey_maniac@lemmy.ca

                          Doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a right wing bias and agenda, though. I haven’t read thd Star in decades, so I don’t know. Just pointing out the (probably) painfully obvious (because I have a tendency to do that).

                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          Kindness is Punk
                          wrote on last edited by kindnessispunk@lemmy.ca
                          #16

                          I replied to the wrong person, my apologies.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Daniel QuinnD Daniel Quinn

                            “To balance or to pay for these types of additional spending there would need to be severe cuts to the public service, significant cuts,” Giroux said.

                            This is a lie.

                            It’s worse than a lie really. Behind this claim are two decisions that the Liberals have made in advance so that they can present this with the frame that cuts are “necessary”:

                            1. The spending is required, despite not having it in the budget.
                            2. The budget may not be increased through taxing the rich.

                            In other words, Carney wants a pony and rather than make his rich friends pay for it, he’s going to screw everyone else.

                            So yeah, conservatives.

                            K This user is from outside of this forum
                            K This user is from outside of this forum
                            Kindness is Punk
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            The party has clearly shifted right under Carney, but conflating them with the Conservatives isn’t just inaccurate, it’s dangerous. Yes, there’s overlap on some issues, but the Conservatives are far more extreme. We’ve seen what happens when we treat two parties as the same despite glaring differences: it only helps the worst actors.

                            What we need now is relentless pressure for left-wing policies and holding our politicians accountable.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                              This post did not contain any content.
                              403 Forbidden

                              favicon

                              (ottawacitizen.com)

                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              alolanvulpix@lemmy.ca
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              The Ottawa Citizen is American owned media pretending to be Canadian, infiltrating Canadian culture and politics.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              5

                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              • First post
                                Last post