Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating
-
These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc
It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.
…
It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.
Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating
The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial
The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)
In the same way that slot machines are calibrated to provide just the right pattern of intermittent reinforcement to make people think they’ll pay off, photo radar is carefully tuned to provide exactly the number of randomly-generated fines in the mail that will most annoy everyone who drives a car.
-
These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc
It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.
…
It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.
Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating
The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial
The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)
I maintain that every driver should be tested every time they renew their license, and fines should be a percentage of income starting at 1% and scaling to permanent license removal.
-
These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc
It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.
…
It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.
Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating
The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial
The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)
Put them everywhere. And put red light cameras everywhere, too. And if we can put cameras at stop signs, we should do that, too.
North American drivers are incapable of following traffic safety rules, and it kills people. We can at least recover those costs to help degrow car infrastructure.
-
I maintain that every driver should be tested every time they renew their license, and fines should be a percentage of income starting at 1% and scaling to permanent license removal.
Seconded.
-
Alberta made it so photo radar is now only allowed in school zones and construction sites
Turns out, photo radar is only “annoying” if you’re exceeding the legal posted speed limit…
Its bizarre to me that the government (who is responsible for creating laws), is taking the stance that enforcing them should be optional.
Imagine if Alberta could fund fall immunization programs instead of reducing speeding fines for people speeding!
-
I maintain that every driver should be tested every time they renew their license, and fines should be a percentage of income starting at 1% and scaling to permanent license removal.
Police should have the power to send you back to test again.
-
Alberta made it so photo radar is now only allowed in school zones and construction sites
This is how it should be used
-
Alberta made it so photo radar is now only allowed in school zones and construction sites
As if I needed another reason to shit talk Alberta, but the list just keeps increasing
-
Police should have the power to send you back to test again.
No thanks. Don’t want some power tripping asshole or racist to have that much power.
-
As if I needed another reason to shit talk Alberta, but the list just keeps increasing
Photo radar is a cash grab. Have cops pull people over it’s much more effective at changing behaviour. And really shitty drivers actually loose their license so they get off the road.
All photo radar does is slow people down for the 100’s of meters by the site then they speed up.
-
These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc
It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.
…
It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.
Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating
The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial
The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)
The obvious solution is just get rid of driving. What other hobby is it accepted and considered a requirement to put other people in danger?
-
These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc
It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.
…
It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.
Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating
The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial
The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)
Stop speeding, don’t get tickets. Speed cameras are a tax on the ignorant and selfish. Keep them.
-
The obvious solution is just get rid of driving. What other hobby is it accepted and considered a requirement to put other people in danger?
The obvious solution is just get rid of driving.
Or, you know, just be aware of the current speed limit and respect it?
-
Police should have the power to send you back to test again.
They kinda do? I called in an old lady who had been playing pinball with cars at the local store, and almost backed into a couple pedestrians.
Cop showed up, noted hey inability to turn her head even to talk with him much less check mirrors - plus the assortment of dings on her car - and pulled her license. AFAIK she wouldn’t need a retest but she would need a medical note attesting to her ability to drive
-
These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc
It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.
…
It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.
Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating
The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial
The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)
Photoradar and red light cameras are just neoliberal regressive bullshit. There is clearly a structural problem because most people speed, roads are hazardous to cyclists and unpleasant for pedestrians, intersections are dangerous for everyone.
Photoradar and red light cameras ADMIT there is a structural problem, but decided the solution is individual actions.
Traffic deaths, speeding, dangerous intersections, bicycle infrastructure, active and public transit, human friendly streets, these are ALL solved problems. Traffic engineers have been writing out the solutions since the 70’s and the municipalities and countries who have begun implementing these solutions have seen MASSIVE improvements on all fronts.
The solution is increasing taxes on the wealthy so we can build proper, safe, enjoyable human scale infrastructure. Red light cameras and speeding cameras play no role in the solution. You can’t fix structural problems through individual action, this is just the semi-progressive neoliberal version “pull yourself up by your bootstraps”.
I totally get the car hate, and the vitriol towards unsafe drivers. But don’t fall down the trap of blaming individuals for the failures of the system
-
The obvious solution is just get rid of driving. What other hobby is it accepted and considered a requirement to put other people in danger?
only the number one cause of death behind firearms in the US. guns and cars and 'merika…
but you, canada… I expected better.
-
These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc
It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.
…
It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.
Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating
The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial
The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)
A week ago we were on a 400km drive. In that time there were 2 completely separate fatal accidents along our route. Both were caused by excessive speeding. Not just 10 or 20km over the speed limit but excessive. One was figured to be going more than double the speed limit. One of the assholes took another innocent driver with them. I have changed by opinion on speed cameras and red light cameras because even on city streets so many drivers think that whatever speed they want to do is ok and they don’t give a rat’s ass about anyone else on the road. Unless drivers improve, I think every technological means necessary should be used to tackle them.
-
A week ago we were on a 400km drive. In that time there were 2 completely separate fatal accidents along our route. Both were caused by excessive speeding. Not just 10 or 20km over the speed limit but excessive. One was figured to be going more than double the speed limit. One of the assholes took another innocent driver with them. I have changed by opinion on speed cameras and red light cameras because even on city streets so many drivers think that whatever speed they want to do is ok and they don’t give a rat’s ass about anyone else on the road. Unless drivers improve, I think every technological means necessary should be used to tackle them.
I’m lucky. I’ve never seen a fatal accident.
Fatalities are more likely at higher speeds. Training drivers to slow down and drive at a reasonable speed seems like a really good idea.
-
Photoradar and red light cameras are just neoliberal regressive bullshit. There is clearly a structural problem because most people speed, roads are hazardous to cyclists and unpleasant for pedestrians, intersections are dangerous for everyone.
Photoradar and red light cameras ADMIT there is a structural problem, but decided the solution is individual actions.
Traffic deaths, speeding, dangerous intersections, bicycle infrastructure, active and public transit, human friendly streets, these are ALL solved problems. Traffic engineers have been writing out the solutions since the 70’s and the municipalities and countries who have begun implementing these solutions have seen MASSIVE improvements on all fronts.
The solution is increasing taxes on the wealthy so we can build proper, safe, enjoyable human scale infrastructure. Red light cameras and speeding cameras play no role in the solution. You can’t fix structural problems through individual action, this is just the semi-progressive neoliberal version “pull yourself up by your bootstraps”.
I totally get the car hate, and the vitriol towards unsafe drivers. But don’t fall down the trap of blaming individuals for the failures of the system
We can do both. Rebuilding roads to support active transit is going to take a lot of time and money. In the meantime, enforcing existing speed limits makes a lot of sense.
-
These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc
It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.
…
It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.
Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating
The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial
The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)
If the speed limit is too low then it should be fixed. Non-enforcement is stupid.
Let the robot do the robot’s job instead of having expensive police officers arbitrarily pull over unlucky losers to sit on dangerous shoulders and hope that nobody will accidentally kill the cop or the speeder.
