Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating

Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
48 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T thalion@lemmy.ca

    Alberta made it so photo radar is now only allowed in school zones and construction sites

    M This user is from outside of this forum
    M This user is from outside of this forum
    Mike
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    Turns out, photo radar is only “annoying” if you’re exceeding the legal posted speed limit…

    Its bizarre to me that the government (who is responsible for creating laws), is taking the stance that enforcing them should be optional.

    Imagine if Alberta could fund fall immunization programs instead of reducing speeding fines for people speeding!

    1 Reply Last reply
    8
    • A arkouda@lemmy.ca

      I maintain that every driver should be tested every time they renew their license, and fines should be a percentage of income starting at 1% and scaling to permanent license removal.

      Y This user is from outside of this forum
      Y This user is from outside of this forum
      yezzey@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Police should have the power to send you back to test again.

      A P 2 Replies Last reply
      4
      • T thalion@lemmy.ca

        Alberta made it so photo radar is now only allowed in school zones and construction sites

        Y This user is from outside of this forum
        Y This user is from outside of this forum
        yezzey@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        This is how it should be used

        1 Reply Last reply
        8
        • T thalion@lemmy.ca

          Alberta made it so photo radar is now only allowed in school zones and construction sites

          V This user is from outside of this forum
          V This user is from outside of this forum
          Victor Villas
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          As if I needed another reason to shit talk Alberta, but the list just keeps increasing

          A 1 Reply Last reply
          6
          • Y yezzey@lemmy.ca

            Police should have the power to send you back to test again.

            A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            auli@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            No thanks. Don’t want some power tripping asshole or racist to have that much power.

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • V Victor Villas

              As if I needed another reason to shit talk Alberta, but the list just keeps increasing

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              auli@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by auli@lemmy.ca
              #13

              Photo radar is a cash grab. Have cops pull people over it’s much more effective at changing behaviour. And really shitty drivers actually loose their license so they get off the road.

              All photo radar does is slow people down for the 100’s of meters by the site then they speed up.

              V 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • S sbv@sh.itjust.works

                These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc

                It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.

                …

                It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.

                Link Preview Image
                Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating

                The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial

                favicon

                The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

                archive.is

                favicon

                (archive.is)

                I This user is from outside of this forum
                I This user is from outside of this forum
                ilikeboobies@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by ilikeboobies@lemmy.ca
                #14

                The obvious solution is just get rid of driving. What other hobby is it accepted and considered a requirement to put other people in danger?

                loutr@sh.itjust.worksL mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldM 2 Replies Last reply
                7
                • S sbv@sh.itjust.works

                  These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc

                  It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.

                  …

                  It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating

                  The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial

                  favicon

                  The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

                  archive.is

                  favicon

                  (archive.is)

                  Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                  Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                  Nik282000
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  Stop speeding, don’t get tickets. Speed cameras are a tax on the ignorant and selfish. Keep them.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  15
                  • I ilikeboobies@lemmy.ca

                    The obvious solution is just get rid of driving. What other hobby is it accepted and considered a requirement to put other people in danger?

                    loutr@sh.itjust.worksL This user is from outside of this forum
                    loutr@sh.itjust.worksL This user is from outside of this forum
                    loutr@sh.itjust.works
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    The obvious solution is just get rid of driving.

                    Or, you know, just be aware of the current speed limit and respect it?

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • Y yezzey@lemmy.ca

                      Police should have the power to send you back to test again.

                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      phx@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      They kinda do? I called in an old lady who had been playing pinball with cars at the local store, and almost backed into a couple pedestrians.

                      Cop showed up, noted hey inability to turn her head even to talk with him much less check mirrors - plus the assortment of dings on her car - and pulled her license. AFAIK she wouldn’t need a retest but she would need a medical note attesting to her ability to drive

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • S sbv@sh.itjust.works

                        These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc

                        It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.

                        …

                        It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.

                        Link Preview Image
                        Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating

                        The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial

                        favicon

                        The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

                        archive.is

                        favicon

                        (archive.is)

                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                        hacksaw@lemmy.ca
                        wrote on last edited by hacksaw@lemmy.ca
                        #18

                        Photoradar and red light cameras are just neoliberal regressive bullshit. There is clearly a structural problem because most people speed, roads are hazardous to cyclists and unpleasant for pedestrians, intersections are dangerous for everyone.

                        Photoradar and red light cameras ADMIT there is a structural problem, but decided the solution is individual actions.

                        Traffic deaths, speeding, dangerous intersections, bicycle infrastructure, active and public transit, human friendly streets, these are ALL solved problems. Traffic engineers have been writing out the solutions since the 70’s and the municipalities and countries who have begun implementing these solutions have seen MASSIVE improvements on all fronts.

                        The solution is increasing taxes on the wealthy so we can build proper, safe, enjoyable human scale infrastructure. Red light cameras and speeding cameras play no role in the solution. You can’t fix structural problems through individual action, this is just the semi-progressive neoliberal version “pull yourself up by your bootstraps”.

                        I totally get the car hate, and the vitriol towards unsafe drivers. But don’t fall down the trap of blaming individuals for the failures of the system

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        17
                        • I ilikeboobies@lemmy.ca

                          The obvious solution is just get rid of driving. What other hobby is it accepted and considered a requirement to put other people in danger?

                          mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          only the number one cause of death behind firearms in the US. guns and cars and 'merika…

                          but you, canada… I expected better.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • S sbv@sh.itjust.works

                            These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc

                            It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.

                            …

                            It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.

                            Link Preview Image
                            Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating

                            The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial

                            favicon

                            The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

                            archive.is

                            favicon

                            (archive.is)

                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            A week ago we were on a 400km drive. In that time there were 2 completely separate fatal accidents along our route. Both were caused by excessive speeding. Not just 10 or 20km over the speed limit but excessive. One was figured to be going more than double the speed limit. One of the assholes took another innocent driver with them. I have changed by opinion on speed cameras and red light cameras because even on city streets so many drivers think that whatever speed they want to do is ok and they don’t give a rat’s ass about anyone else on the road. Unless drivers improve, I think every technological means necessary should be used to tackle them.

                            S G 2 Replies Last reply
                            8
                            • B bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca

                              A week ago we were on a 400km drive. In that time there were 2 completely separate fatal accidents along our route. Both were caused by excessive speeding. Not just 10 or 20km over the speed limit but excessive. One was figured to be going more than double the speed limit. One of the assholes took another innocent driver with them. I have changed by opinion on speed cameras and red light cameras because even on city streets so many drivers think that whatever speed they want to do is ok and they don’t give a rat’s ass about anyone else on the road. Unless drivers improve, I think every technological means necessary should be used to tackle them.

                              S This user is from outside of this forum
                              S This user is from outside of this forum
                              sbv@sh.itjust.works
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              I’m lucky. I’ve never seen a fatal accident.

                              Fatalities are more likely at higher speeds. Training drivers to slow down and drive at a reasonable speed seems like a really good idea.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • H hacksaw@lemmy.ca

                                Photoradar and red light cameras are just neoliberal regressive bullshit. There is clearly a structural problem because most people speed, roads are hazardous to cyclists and unpleasant for pedestrians, intersections are dangerous for everyone.

                                Photoradar and red light cameras ADMIT there is a structural problem, but decided the solution is individual actions.

                                Traffic deaths, speeding, dangerous intersections, bicycle infrastructure, active and public transit, human friendly streets, these are ALL solved problems. Traffic engineers have been writing out the solutions since the 70’s and the municipalities and countries who have begun implementing these solutions have seen MASSIVE improvements on all fronts.

                                The solution is increasing taxes on the wealthy so we can build proper, safe, enjoyable human scale infrastructure. Red light cameras and speeding cameras play no role in the solution. You can’t fix structural problems through individual action, this is just the semi-progressive neoliberal version “pull yourself up by your bootstraps”.

                                I totally get the car hate, and the vitriol towards unsafe drivers. But don’t fall down the trap of blaming individuals for the failures of the system

                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                sbv@sh.itjust.works
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                We can do both. Rebuilding roads to support active transit is going to take a lot of time and money. In the meantime, enforcing existing speed limits makes a lot of sense.

                                H 1 Reply Last reply
                                5
                                • S sbv@sh.itjust.works

                                  These up-eds usually complain that photo radar would be fine if the radar worked properly. This one doesn’t even do that. It just complains that speed limits aren’t fair and now drivers have to change their behavior. jfc

                                  It is true that drivers can avoid such tickets by sticking to the posted speed limits, but it is also true that drivers are hardly ever expected to strictly observe those limits.

                                  …

                                  It’s like the generally accepted contract between drivers and police – just drive at a reasonable speed and you’ll be fine – has been broken.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Opinion: Photo radar is becoming increasingly common. That doesn’t make it any less infuriating

                                  The question of fairness is what makes photo radar so controversial

                                  favicon

                                  The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

                                  archive.is

                                  favicon

                                  (archive.is)

                                  PxtlP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  PxtlP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Pxtl
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  If the speed limit is too low then it should be fixed. Non-enforcement is stupid.

                                  Let the robot do the robot’s job instead of having expensive police officers arbitrarily pull over unlucky losers to sit on dangerous shoulders and hope that nobody will accidentally kill the cop or the speeder.

                                  F 1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • T thalion@lemmy.ca

                                    Alberta made it so photo radar is now only allowed in school zones and construction sites

                                    PxtlP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    PxtlP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Pxtl
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    Lol conservatives being conservatives “we want to be tough on law breakers except for the ones who break the laws that I break”.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • S sbv@sh.itjust.works

                                      We can do both. Rebuilding roads to support active transit is going to take a lot of time and money. In the meantime, enforcing existing speed limits makes a lot of sense.

                                      H This user is from outside of this forum
                                      H This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hacksaw@lemmy.ca
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      Not really. Speeding isn’t people not caring to go the right speed. If that was it, only people who break rules would speed. Speeding is a structural problem from the design of cars which accelerate fast and have top speeds as high as double the highest legal died limit, and roads which are designed to be comfortably driven WAY faster than the posted speed limit.

                                      Most people speed. The roads are designed for you to speed on. The cars are designed to speed with. Long commutes and traffic to go to an underpaid job mean people are driving at their most frustrated state.

                                      Most people HAVE to drive to live, because of no public infrastructure and poor city planning.

                                      It’s a STRUCTURAL problem. You can’t solve structural problems through individual actions. It’s like asking minorities to work harder as the solution to equality. Obama was able to become president so it’s got to be possible. It’s a distraction from dealing with systemic racism and poverty.

                                      That’s basically the reason neoliberalism leads to neofascism. A neoliberal is just someone who admits there are structural problems but thinks collective/systematic solutions are “too extreme” and the problem can be solved if everyone just behaves the right way every time.

                                      Individual solutions don’t solve structural problems.

                                      H V 2 Replies Last reply
                                      6
                                      • A auli@lemmy.ca

                                        Photo radar is a cash grab. Have cops pull people over it’s much more effective at changing behaviour. And really shitty drivers actually loose their license so they get off the road.

                                        All photo radar does is slow people down for the 100’s of meters by the site then they speed up.

                                        V This user is from outside of this forum
                                        V This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Victor Villas
                                        wrote on last edited by villasv@lemmy.ca
                                        #26

                                        Photo radar is a cash grab.

                                        Yeah fuck those drivers and let’s grab their cash at least up until we can grab their licenses.

                                        Have cops pull people over it’s much more effective at changing behaviour.

                                        If only we had actual data analyzed by real researches out there instead of basing ourselves on talk radio bullshit like this

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • F This user is from outside of this forum
                                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                                          fireretardant@lemmy.world
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          You got a source that cameras are randonly generating finea? Ive got 1 ticket from a camera in my life, my boss is a rampant speeder and he has gotten dozens. This seems more behavioral than random.

                                          kbalK 1 Reply Last reply
                                          3

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post