Carney's WEF speech looks to be AI generated. While I don't have a problem with using LLMs to help with writing, can he really not afford to pay a human staffer to help write his speeches?
-
This was a speech by a world leader for a global audience. I guarantee you that the tool you are using to identify LLM usage was not trained on or designed for this kind of data set. That LLM detector is working well above its pay grade.
-
“Moderately confident”
“This is a BETA feature” -
AI LLM detection is notoriously unreliable.
-
This was a speech by a world leader for a global audience. I guarantee you that the tool you are using to identify LLM usage was not trained on or designed for this kind of data set. That LLM detector is working well above its pay grade.
LLM speech detectors were never trained on mountains of publicly available data from world leaders is a hell of a cope buddy
-
“Moderately confident”
“This is a BETA feature”Weird how putting any actually human written text in there never gets flagged as AI generated, try it yourself kiddo https://app.gptzero.me/
-
AI LLM detection is notoriously unreliable.
you can try it yourself by putting text written by actual people and see how that goes https://app.gptzero.me/
-
Weird how putting any actually human written text in there never gets flagged as AI generated, try it yourself kiddo https://app.gptzero.me/
That’s not an effective test of whether this works. So no thank you, dear.
-
Weird how putting any actually human written text in there never gets flagged as AI generated, try it yourself kiddo https://app.gptzero.me/
I pasted in the first half of the speech and it said 100% human.
-
AI detectors are garbage. Lots of false positives. False negatives. Garbage.
-
I pasted in the first half of the speech and it said 100% human.
And there you go, it can tell the parts he actually wrote apart.
-
That’s not an effective test of whether this works. So no thank you, dear.
You’re welcome to keep coping honey. Here are the guidelines Wikipedia uses to sniff out LLM speech if you don’t trust automated tools. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing
Of course, it’s entirely possible that Carney naturally speaks like a chatbot, which doesn’t exactly make it better.
-
AI detectors are garbage. Lots of false positives. False negatives. Garbage.
Exactly, some people just naturally talk like chatbots, an especially common phenomenon among the political class.
-
Btw, the US constitution from 1787 seems to be AI generated: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/why-ai-detectors-think-the-us-constitution-was-written-by-ai/
-
Btw, the US constitution from 1787 seems to be AI generated: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/why-ai-detectors-think-the-us-constitution-was-written-by-ai/
nah
edit: I love how liberals, who see themselves as bastions of rational thinking, immediately start downvoting facts they don’t like
-
You are such a joke.
-
You are such a joke.
I’d be so insulted right now if I had a shred of respect for you
-
absolutely love how mad y’all are at me for pointing out that Carney talks like a chatbot
-
You are such a joke.
-
you can try it yourself by putting text written by actual people and see how that goes https://app.gptzero.me/
That doesn’t make LLM detection any more reliable
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login