Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. RPGMemes
  3. Cope

Cope

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved RPGMemes
rpgmemes
79 Posts 43 Posters 7 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 K 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮

    A fuckton of people these days play D&D as a pick-up game with randos off Discord or Roll20 and not actually in person with people they know.

    P This user is from outside of this forum
    P This user is from outside of this forum
    paradachshund@lemmy.today
    wrote last edited by
    #26

    I guess that makes sense. To be honest for me it’s such a social experience who I’m playing with is the biggest thing I care about.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • R runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone

      For all its other faults, I love the Edge system of shadowrun. In brief, Edge is an attribute like strength or charisma but also a resource pool. You can spend a point for a greater chance of success, or you can permanently burn an edge point for a +4 success (degree of success is calculated into damage).

      J This user is from outside of this forum
      J This user is from outside of this forum
      jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      wrote last edited by
      #27

      I feel like I would never burn edge, but hold onto it like Elixirs in final fantasy. (Unless you can restore it somehow)

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      8
      • A amazingawesomator@lemmy.world

        PF2e. #recommend

        festnt@sh.itjust.worksF This user is from outside of this forum
        festnt@sh.itjust.worksF This user is from outside of this forum
        festnt@sh.itjust.works
        wrote last edited by
        #28

        ok so for anyone wandering, most rolls in pf2e are required to be open, except for actions with the secret trait, which the gm rolls in secret. there are very fw of those, and they are only ever used for when a player/pc shouldn’t know how well they went. some examples are: peception checks, stealth, recall knowledge, deception, and some other similar checks that, in real life, you couldn’t really know how well you did

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        6
        • N neatchee@lemmy.world

          Generally speaking, it’s almost always a bad idea to fudge things to make it worse, but acceptable to fudge things to make it better.

          If your players are rolling well, good for them! Sometimes players want to feel really lucky and like their investments paid off. If that makes your campaign too easy there are lots of ways to address it, and an easy fight will rarely if ever cause a campaign to crumble

          But a series of bad rolls? That can absolutely melt a campaign. It can suck the soul out of a party and make things feel unfair or too difficult even when it’s just a string of bad luck. Preventing a TPK or allowing a PC to narrowly escape certain doom can be the difference between a player losing interest and them learning how to mitigate risk.

          GMs should all spend some time reading up on the psychology of games and player behavior. Stress and frustration exist in the strangest, most illogical places because our brains are strange and illogical.

          J This user is from outside of this forum
          J This user is from outside of this forum
          jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          wrote last edited by
          #29

          One of the things I like from Fate is the concept of Conceding. It gives players the option to give up.

          So when you have bad rolls or the situation is going real bad, you can concede. You all decide what that looks like. You don’t get whatever you wanted in the conflict, but you decide if that means you’re just left for dead, or you fall into the river and are swept away, or what. You get one or more fate points, too. Because this is written into the rules, it doesn’t feel as cheaty as it would in DND for a player to say “I don’t think we can win this. Can we say we escape somehow?”

          You can always choose to fight to the bitter end, but then you don’t really have anyone to blame but yourself.

          DND is an old game and it’s just missing whole concepts like this that I think would make a better experience.

          N 1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • P paradachshund@lemmy.today

            Do that many of you really play in these antagonistic as fuck groups? I see so many memes that imply a very a hostile dynamic between DM and players. I think you might need to find a better group if that’s the general atmosphere.

            D This user is from outside of this forum
            D This user is from outside of this forum
            dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
            wrote last edited by
            #30

            Not really, at least, not anymore.

            There are some people that come to RPGs to escape reality and man, do they need it. D&D holds out a promise of agency, power, and control, in a fantasy setting free from real consequences. Provided a player lacks these things in real life, they can cling to it like a life-preserver. Then, take any of that away - as a DM must do - and things can get ugly.

            I really want to say that there’s a known and practiced way to get people like this some real help, like a free hotline or website. After all, if it’s going to come up, this is the place it’s going to happen. Sadly, I know of no such resource.

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            34
            • festnt@sh.itjust.worksF festnt@sh.itjust.works

              ok so for anyone wandering, most rolls in pf2e are required to be open, except for actions with the secret trait, which the gm rolls in secret. there are very fw of those, and they are only ever used for when a player/pc shouldn’t know how well they went. some examples are: peception checks, stealth, recall knowledge, deception, and some other similar checks that, in real life, you couldn’t really know how well you did

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              amazingawesomator@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by
              #31

              though these secret rolls remove the comedy behind the kronk stealth theme music (emporer’s new groove) upon critical failure, it does help with metagaming.

              festnt@sh.itjust.worksF 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 K 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮

                A fuckton of people these days play D&D as a pick-up game with randos off Discord or Roll20 and not actually in person with people they know.

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                Skua
                wrote last edited by
                #32

                To be fair that still doesn’t prevent you from kicking arseholes out of the group. I run games for randoms on Discord and will absolutely tell people to either remember that we’re all here to have fun or to not bother coming back. That said I do recognise that it can be difficult to find groups sometimes and that can push people to have lower standards than they maybe should

                1 Reply Last reply
                11
                • S snooggums

                  Shouldn’t play a game with random rolls if one doesn’t like random rolls. Secret rolls don’t add anything except suspicion.

                  As a DM if I decide something is going to happen then I don’t bother rolling. Like if a character who is competent wants to do something and they have plenty of time they just succeed. If a monster is sneaking I might just compare their stealth to character perception if being stealthy doesn’t have more of an impact that the characters finding out they were being followed. If it has a game play impact then I roll openly but don’t say what it is for. That way there is no suspicion that I rolled low and decided that it should just pass instead when the reason for the roll is eventually revealed.

                  explodicle@sh.itjust.worksE This user is from outside of this forum
                  explodicle@sh.itjust.worksE This user is from outside of this forum
                  explodicle@sh.itjust.works
                  wrote last edited by
                  #33

                  Some events in my campaign are doomed to happen no matter what, but I don’t always want the players to know it.

                  For example if they try a Survival check to track someone who was never even there, I might make a secret Stealth roll plus a million bazillion.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • KichaeK Kichae

                    So many people hate secret rolls. So many people feel like they remove agency from them.

                    But that’s what the dice do. They’re agency-revoking machines.

                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                    potatoesfall@discuss.tchncs.de
                    wrote last edited by
                    #34

                    I’m a GM and I have offered my players many times to stop doing secret rolls, but they like it. I think they especially like it when I have to make up BS on a crit fail

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    8
                    • D dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world

                      Not really, at least, not anymore.

                      There are some people that come to RPGs to escape reality and man, do they need it. D&D holds out a promise of agency, power, and control, in a fantasy setting free from real consequences. Provided a player lacks these things in real life, they can cling to it like a life-preserver. Then, take any of that away - as a DM must do - and things can get ugly.

                      I really want to say that there’s a known and practiced way to get people like this some real help, like a free hotline or website. After all, if it’s going to come up, this is the place it’s going to happen. Sadly, I know of no such resource.

                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      paradachshund@lemmy.today
                      wrote last edited by
                      #35

                      Yeah, that makes sense. Those people would really hate my games because I’ve switched to call of cthulhu lately and in that game you are absolutely not powerful 😅

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      8
                      • J jjjalljs@ttrpg.network

                        One reason people may dislike secret rolls is you can’t be sure the GM isn’t just lying to you. Though if that’s the case, you should probably find a GM you trust.

                        On the other hand, I prefer systems where dice aren’t the sole arbiter. I want to be able to spend a fate point or inspiration, or succeed at a cost.

                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                        wrote last edited by
                        #36

                        One reason people may dislike secret rolls is you can’t be sure the GM isn’t just lying to you.

                        But how do they know what the DC is?

                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • J jjjalljs@ttrpg.network

                          One of the things I like from Fate is the concept of Conceding. It gives players the option to give up.

                          So when you have bad rolls or the situation is going real bad, you can concede. You all decide what that looks like. You don’t get whatever you wanted in the conflict, but you decide if that means you’re just left for dead, or you fall into the river and are swept away, or what. You get one or more fate points, too. Because this is written into the rules, it doesn’t feel as cheaty as it would in DND for a player to say “I don’t think we can win this. Can we say we escape somehow?”

                          You can always choose to fight to the bitter end, but then you don’t really have anyone to blame but yourself.

                          DND is an old game and it’s just missing whole concepts like this that I think would make a better experience.

                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          neatchee@lemmy.world
                          wrote last edited by
                          #37

                          6e when?

                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works

                            One reason people may dislike secret rolls is you can’t be sure the GM isn’t just lying to you.

                            But how do they know what the DC is?

                            J This user is from outside of this forum
                            J This user is from outside of this forum
                            jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                            wrote last edited by
                            #38

                            Depends on the system, style, and context.

                            For example, if I’m casting a spell on a victim in 5e, I know what the DC is.

                            For something like “finding the trap”, in D&D that’s pretty open to the GM. I usually tell players the target number before they roll, so they can better decide if they want to use more resources or rethink.

                            Other systems might have more specific rules.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • N neatchee@lemmy.world

                              6e when?

                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                              wrote last edited by
                              #39

                              I don’t think D&D will ever really change much. There are people that really like its quirks, and there’d be a backlash from people if they made large changes. People still repeat largely nonsense complaints about 4e, sometimes while trying to patch 5e with ideas that 4e did.

                              Unfortunately, some people like it without ever trying anything else. D&D is a mega behemoth. I personally think it’s more popular than it should be, given how many people I’ve talked to that play it only with a generous heaping of house rules and practices that transform it into something else.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • J jjjalljs@ttrpg.network

                                One reason people may dislike secret rolls is you can’t be sure the GM isn’t just lying to you. Though if that’s the case, you should probably find a GM you trust.

                                On the other hand, I prefer systems where dice aren’t the sole arbiter. I want to be able to spend a fate point or inspiration, or succeed at a cost.

                                W This user is from outside of this forum
                                W This user is from outside of this forum
                                wolflink@sh.itjust.works
                                wrote last edited by
                                #40

                                That’s part of the job as a DM. I would often have new enemies show up to the fight if it was going too well, or secretly nerf the enemies stats if it was going too poorly.

                                J 1 Reply Last reply
                                12
                                • W wolflink@sh.itjust.works

                                  That’s part of the job as a DM. I would often have new enemies show up to the fight if it was going too well, or secretly nerf the enemies stats if it was going too poorly.

                                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #41

                                  That’s one way to play. Personally, if I knew the GM was secretly adjusting the game much I’d feel dissatisfied. Why not just give me a sticker that says “You win!” if I’m always going to win anyway?

                                  Though this does tie into a separate bugbear of mine: D&D makes it hard to reason about encounters because the stats are unbound and all over the place. You see four bandits rummaging through the wagon they stole. Do each of them have 8 hp, 16 hp, 32 hp, 64 hp? Who knows! Do they attack once or twice? Could go either way! That is not an innate property of RPGs, but it’s very common in D&D, and I think leads to a lot of “oh this is going badly - let me fudge the stats”. Both because the GM got the math wrong, and because the players assumed these were 8 HP bandits and they’re actually “well you’re 5th level the bandits should be tougher” level scaling bandits.

                                  mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldM C 2 Replies Last reply
                                  6
                                  • J jellyfishhunter@lemmy.world

                                    I don’t see the issue with the GM lying to players if the lie makes the game more fun and less frustrating.

                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Cethin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #42

                                    Sure, sometimes. It should be used incredibly rarely. However, not in this way. The GM has plenty of levers to pull without messing with the one thing you have players for. If the GM is just going to tell a story then they should write a book. If they want to do cooperative storytelling then they need to cooperate.

                                    If the rolls don’t matter then the story gets incredibly boring, as it just goes whatever direction the GM wants. Without failure, success is boring. Without success, failure sucks. When they’re perfectly balanced by the GM, it’s predictable and not surprising or fun.

                                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J jjjalljs@ttrpg.network

                                      I feel like I would never burn edge, but hold onto it like Elixirs in final fantasy. (Unless you can restore it somehow)

                                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                                      runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #43

                                      You can, it just seemed like a lot of info to dump in my first post. Shadowrun is a classless, level less system. Your xp is called Karma, and you can spend Karma to increase your skills and attributes.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      4
                                      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 K 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮

                                        A fuckton of people these days play D&D as a pick-up game with randos off Discord or Roll20 and not actually in person with people they know.

                                        mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                                        wrote last edited by mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                                        #44

                                        so the jerk ratio is higher? genuine query, only played with friends irl

                                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J jjjalljs@ttrpg.network

                                          That’s one way to play. Personally, if I knew the GM was secretly adjusting the game much I’d feel dissatisfied. Why not just give me a sticker that says “You win!” if I’m always going to win anyway?

                                          Though this does tie into a separate bugbear of mine: D&D makes it hard to reason about encounters because the stats are unbound and all over the place. You see four bandits rummaging through the wagon they stole. Do each of them have 8 hp, 16 hp, 32 hp, 64 hp? Who knows! Do they attack once or twice? Could go either way! That is not an innate property of RPGs, but it’s very common in D&D, and I think leads to a lot of “oh this is going badly - let me fudge the stats”. Both because the GM got the math wrong, and because the players assumed these were 8 HP bandits and they’re actually “well you’re 5th level the bandits should be tougher” level scaling bandits.

                                          mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                                          wrote last edited by mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                                          #45

                                          Personally, if I knew the GM was secretly adjusting the game much I’d feel dissatisfied

                                          the point is to make your death a fun and meaningful one, or at least a good punchline to a run. it’s not ‘to let you win’ - I’ve had characters of my own survive encounters but regret the outcome - I think you’re reducing the dm/gm role to a combat calculator, and there’s so much more going on with a talented one. storytelling is my favorite part of DM’ing and I’ll be fucked if I let a kobold derail the overall plan… but there’s a lot of room for kobold fuckery within that envelope.

                                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                                          4

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post