Common sugar substitute shown to impair brain cells, boost stroke risk
-
Eritritolo: pro e contro del dolcificante naturale
Il dolcificante naturale eritritolo non apporta calorie e non aumenta la glicemia. Gli effetti a lungo termine, però, non sono ancora chiari: limitarne il consumo è la scelta migliore
Fondazione Umberto Veronesi (www.fondazioneveronesi.it)
-
Yep. Erythiol has a molecular weight of 122 g/mol, so 6 mM is the same as 0.732 g/liter.
It should be noted that the cells were exposed to the full concentration in the drinks, so the concentration they encountered is much higher than it is when it has been diluted by all the water in our bodies after we drink it.
-
Not for diabetics
-
Splenda doesn’t contain erythritol. That makes that whole article suspect.
Splenda the brand certainly sells erythritol; it’s not their main product
Edit: Here’s the one from my cupboard
-
Why cannot they just put erythriol in the title?
-
Yeah but shit like this makes me not want to read the article at all. I just skim it until I find what the thing is.
Just like some annoying marketing campaigns with ads that you have no fucking idea what they are about (like “.it’s coming”, “soon” and shit like that) and only find out like a month later when they make a new campaign actually telling you that. I will never engage with that company or buy the product just because I hate ads like that.
I never click on clickbait. I refuse to support anyone who engages in that practice.
Skimming the article is the same as reading it in full - they just want to place their cookies, and clicking the link is enough to do that if you don’t go through all the settings including turning off all the “legitimate interest” options - and that is often a pain to do.
-
I never click on clickbait. I refuse to support anyone who engages in that practice.
Skimming the article is the same as reading it in full - they just want to place their cookies, and clicking the link is enough to do that if you don’t go through all the settings including turning off all the “legitimate interest” options - and that is often a pain to do.
I have an extension that automatically does cookies for me
-
Splenda the brand certainly sells erythritol; it’s not their main product
Edit: Here’s the one from my cupboard
Ingredients:
“Maltodextrin, Monk Fruit Extract”
No mention of erythritol.
Splenda Monk Fruit Sweetener Pouch | Zero Calorie Sweetener. Tastes Like Sugar
Our Splenda Monk Fruit Sweetener Pouch is made with monk fruit extract and is zero calories! Enjoy sweetness that satisfies, without the calories.
Splenda® (www.splenda.com)
Not all monk fruit sweeteners contain erythritol.
Does All Monk Fruit Have Erythritol? | Sweet Clarity
Not all monk fruit sweeteners contain erythritol; some are pure monk fruit extract without additives.
(wellwisp.com)
-
Ingredients:
“Maltodextrin, Monk Fruit Extract”
No mention of erythritol.
Splenda Monk Fruit Sweetener Pouch | Zero Calorie Sweetener. Tastes Like Sugar
Our Splenda Monk Fruit Sweetener Pouch is made with monk fruit extract and is zero calories! Enjoy sweetness that satisfies, without the calories.
Splenda® (www.splenda.com)
Not all monk fruit sweeteners contain erythritol.
Does All Monk Fruit Have Erythritol? | Sweet Clarity
Not all monk fruit sweeteners contain erythritol; some are pure monk fruit extract without additives.
(wellwisp.com)
-
You’d think they’d list that on their website.
-
I have an extension that automatically does cookies for me
So do I, but it doesn’t turn off the legitimate interest on a lot of sites. I suspect that the cookie corps are working hard to circumvent it.
-
You’d think they’d list that on their website.
Apparently they do https://www.splenda.com/product/splenda-monk-fruit-sweetener-jar/
-
Our study adds to the evidence suggesting that non-nutritive sweeteners that have generally been purported to be safe, may not come without negative health consequences,”
No. It adds to research about this sweetener. You can’t generalize beyond that.
Except for the numerous other artificial sweeteners that have been found to also have negative effects. This has been a trend, and I think that’s what they meant by that statement
-
Except for the numerous other artificial sweeteners that have been found to also have negative effects. This has been a trend, and I think that’s what they meant by that statement
Their research says nothing about sweeteners that weren’t part of their study.
-
I mean, this was brain cells directly exposed to it in concentrations far higher than would occur in a human body after metabolism with no secondary carbohydrates that would likely come with eating said food (units you like eating spoonfuls of pure Splenda I suppose).
I think brain cells wouldn’t do well exposed directly to many things, like too much oxygen, either.
So I’d say this study should be taken with a grain of
saltsugar -
Their research says nothing about sweeteners that weren’t part of their study.
Correct. However, it ‘adds to’ the evidence provided by other studies
-
Correct. However, it ‘adds to’ the evidence provided by other studies
No, it doesn’t. It only adds to the research on this sweetener.
-
Everything reminds me of her.
-
I have an extension that automatically does cookies for me
Consentomatic? I love that extension.
-
Is there a way to view the full paper? I’m curious if they properly isolated for people who are also overweight (the kind of people who would consume this artificial sweetener).
