Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. U.S. threatens action against foreigners praising Charlie Kirk killing

U.S. threatens action against foreigners praising Charlie Kirk killing

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
110 Posts 66 Posters 119 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T twopi@lemmy.ca

    They didn’t do this with the United Healthcare CEO.

    B This user is from outside of this forum
    B This user is from outside of this forum
    bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    The CEO was killed because of an ongoing harm he was doing. Kirk was killed because someone didnt like what he was saying. If you dont see the difference, well, you might be the dumbest cunt on here yet.

    T P 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    • H hasturinyellow@lemmy.world

      At this point, I’m going to do whatever I want with no regard to what sorts of lists they are making or who they are tracking. I truly don’t care. Show up at my house in the middle of the night and kidnap me. Go ahead. I’m so tired of this fucking place.

      Charlie Kirk was a racist, fascist cunt rag, and now his shirt looks like one. Rot in piss bitch boy.

      B This user is from outside of this forum
      B This user is from outside of this forum
      bthest
      wrote on last edited by bold_atlas@lemmy.world
      #59

      Charlie Kirk 1993-2025 Lived like a bitch, died like a bitch. Gurgle gurgle.

      1 Reply Last reply
      6
      • circav@lemmy.caC circav@lemmy.ca

        Your fash apologia is earning you a block

        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
        wrote on last edited by bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
        #60

        He didnt say that, and Stephen King just got slapped so hard hes still apologising for repeating it on twitter.

        You ALL took the shit he said, and twisted it for your own shitty culture war.

        Link Preview Image
        Stephen King Apologizes for Claiming Charlie Kirk ‘Advocated Stoning Gays’: ‘This Is What I Get for Reading’ X Without ‘Fact-Checking’

        Stephen King has apologized for saying that Charlie Kirk "advocated for stoning gays" without "fact-checking": "Won’t happen again.”

        favicon

        Variety (variety.com)

        The initial claim by King was in reference to comments that Kirk had made on his podcast in 2024, in which Kirk criticized children’s YouTube star Ms. Rachel for citing God’s wish for Christians to “love thy neighbor” in Leviticus, saying that should include gay people. Kirk responded, “By the way, Ms. Rachel, you might want to crack open that Bible of yours. In a lesser reference, part of the same part of scripture, in Leviticus 18, is that ‘thou shall lay with another man shall be stoned to death.’ Just saying.”

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world

          He didnt say that, and Stephen King just got slapped so hard hes still apologising for repeating it on twitter.

          You ALL took the shit he said, and twisted it for your own shitty culture war.

          Link Preview Image
          Stephen King Apologizes for Claiming Charlie Kirk ‘Advocated Stoning Gays’: ‘This Is What I Get for Reading’ X Without ‘Fact-Checking’

          Stephen King has apologized for saying that Charlie Kirk "advocated for stoning gays" without "fact-checking": "Won’t happen again.”

          favicon

          Variety (variety.com)

          The initial claim by King was in reference to comments that Kirk had made on his podcast in 2024, in which Kirk criticized children’s YouTube star Ms. Rachel for citing God’s wish for Christians to “love thy neighbor” in Leviticus, saying that should include gay people. Kirk responded, “By the way, Ms. Rachel, you might want to crack open that Bible of yours. In a lesser reference, part of the same part of scripture, in Leviticus 18, is that ‘thou shall lay with another man shall be stoned to death.’ Just saying.”

          B This user is from outside of this forum
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          bthest
          wrote on last edited by
          #61

          Gurgle gurgle

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • B bthest

            You gonna cwy for Charwie? do baby need a hugy and kissy?

            B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
            wrote on last edited by
            #62

            I dont give a fuck about him. I didnt like him. I didnt like the things he said. Doesnt mean I wanted him dead, or that Im glad hes dead, or that Im going to cheer for the death of another human being just because I disagreed with him on political issues. Im not a fucking cunt, like you clearly are.

            G H 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • S samuelrjankis@sh.itjust.works

              Pierre and Scheer has a lot to say about freedom of speech but get real quiet when Canadians get threatened.

              S This user is from outside of this forum
              S This user is from outside of this forum
              serenesadie@lemmy.myserv.one
              wrote on last edited by
              #63

              Joanne Rowling literally believes transgender people should be persecuted.

              By her own fucking definition, she is a terrorist.

              I hope the black mold leeches into her eyeballs.

              1 Reply Last reply
              29
              • B bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world

                Someone else dies, but youre the real victim… Fucking ghouls.

                J This user is from outside of this forum
                J This user is from outside of this forum
                jason@feddit.uk
                wrote on last edited by
                #64

                Shed a tear for Hitler. He too was a human who was assassinated by the far right.

                1 Reply Last reply
                17
                • B bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world

                  fascist

                  No he wasnt. And Id argue he was a racist either, as much the out of context quotes make it look like he was.

                  Fascist is just another internet buzzword you are all saying because someone else said it. Seriously, go look on conservative boards, they are all calling you fascist for the wrong reasons as much as you call them it for the wrong reason. Wanna know why? Because of the echo chambers you are all stuck in, that keep pumping hate into your ears like a junkie pumps dope.

                  Take a big step back, and I promise you. Instead a couple of days, you will feel so much better. This shit aint healthy. And the fact you are gaining joy from the death of a human being and suffering of his wife and children, should be alarming to you.

                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  professorozone@lemmy.world
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #65

                  Ummm, he died literally one sentence after blaming gun violence on blacks. I’m pretty sure he was racist.

                  I don’t know how the right is justifying calling the left fascists but looking up the definition, and I think defining this is both important and difficult, it is characterized by a strong sense of nationalism. MAGA. Check.

                  Concentration of power into a small number of or a single person. TACO. Check.

                  Creating an enemy of a segment of the population. Immigrants. Check.

                  A capitalist economy subject to strict government controls. Government takes part of nVidea’s profits to allow then to seek secrets chip technology overseas. TACO ordering the fed to let rates. Tariffs. Check.

                  Violent suppression of the opposition. I would call the way ICE is working violent and clearly removing people disloyal to Trump’s agenda from the government along with sueing news organizations and admitting that he would take revenge on his political opponents is pretty friggin close. Check.

                  A policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. If you can’t see that, then I’ll never convince you. Big check.

                  Oppressive dictatorial control. Well let’s see. The right has the house, Senate, the supreme Court, oligarchs, the presidency and the president is acting like a dictator circumventing normal governmental controls. Check.

                  Charlie Kirk has been a lightning rod of indoctrination of young people into this philosophy.

                  So yeah, fascist.

                  The definition comes from the American Heritage Dictionary by the way in addition to other sources. Merriam Webster has a more comprehensive definition. I’d like to see one America DOESN’T match.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  12
                  • S samuelrjankis@sh.itjust.works

                    Pierre and Scheer has a lot to say about freedom of speech but get real quiet when Canadians get threatened.

                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    kreskin@lemmy.world
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #66

                    “I want to underscore that foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country,” Landau said in a post on social media platform X.”

                    So I guess we’ll be deporting all the zionists then…right?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    15
                    • A anomnomnomaly@lemmy.org

                      I never thought I’d hear of a positive school shooting story coming out of the USA

                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                      kreskin@lemmy.world
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #67

                      theres so many school shootings in the US that it was statistically guaranteed to happen eventually.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • B bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world

                        Really? “Whatabout…”??? And YOU actually deserve it. Im not on truthsocial, but I am here. And you lot are fucking ghouls, acting just like the very people you say you hate.

                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                        geedubhayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #68

                        Point at the whatabout in their comment. I’ll wait.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • B bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world

                          I dont give a fuck about him. I didnt like him. I didnt like the things he said. Doesnt mean I wanted him dead, or that Im glad hes dead, or that Im going to cheer for the death of another human being just because I disagreed with him on political issues. Im not a fucking cunt, like you clearly are.

                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          geedubhayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #69

                          Im not a fucking cunt, like you clearly are.

                          To be fair, cunts do possess depth and warmth, two things you’re clearly lacking.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • R reannlegge@lemmy.ca

                            As and I cannot believe I am applauding what JK said in the tweet. JK is a horrible person through and through.

                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #70

                            It’s weird that she just called herself a fundamentalist

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • B bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world

                              So theyre assholes, so that means its ok for you to be one too? So if someone rapes your wife, it makes it ok for you to rape theirs? Kind of a weird way to look at it, dont you think?

                              K This user is from outside of this forum
                              K This user is from outside of this forum
                              krunklom@lemmy.zip
                              wrote on last edited by krunklom@lemmy.zip
                              #71

                              Does widow baby faschy waschy want a bottle? Did you make a boom boom in your diapey widdle fashy washy baby booboo? Aww you’re a cwanky widdle fascist aren’t oo?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • N npcknapsack@lemmy.ca

                                Are they going to start sanctioning individuals all over the world? They did it with the judge in the Bolsonaro case, and it caused problems in Brazil generally. I suppose if they do it to large numbers of people outside of the US, it would end up forcing countries to stop cooperating generally with the US.

                                Side note, by her own definitions, JKR is illiberal. She is a fundamentalist. She is a totalitarian. And she definitely believes that some of her “political” opponents, trans people, should be punished with violence and death. What a telling post.

                                And PP sucks as usual.

                                K This user is from outside of this forum
                                K This user is from outside of this forum
                                kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #72

                                it would end up forcing countries to stop cooperating generally with the US.

                                Trump’s actions (and those of the people he appointed) have already set that in motion.

                                Governments around the world are making agreements among themselves to avoid doing business with the US.

                                The boycott USA movement is citizen led and is growing across the world.

                                The Americans will find themselves increasingly irrelevant on the world stage, though they may not bother to notice for a while.

                                N 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • T twopi@lemmy.ca

                                  They didn’t do this with the United Healthcare CEO.

                                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                                  twopi@lemmy.ca
                                  wrote on last edited by twopi@lemmy.ca
                                  #73

                                  Respose to worg person

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world

                                    The CEO was killed because of an ongoing harm he was doing. Kirk was killed because someone didnt like what he was saying. If you dont see the difference, well, you might be the dumbest cunt on here yet.

                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    twopi@lemmy.ca
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #74

                                    The US government does not believe the CEO was doing harm.

                                    You distinguish a difference between the two but the US government does not.

                                    Furthermore, an insurance claimant (i.e. someone actively being denied healthcare by insurance) was detained for using the words “delay, deny, depose” on the phone. This was under the previous administration. But both administrations agree with the arrest.

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S samuelrjankis@sh.itjust.works

                                      Pierre and Scheer has a lot to say about freedom of speech but get real quiet when Canadians get threatened.

                                      Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Nik282000
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #75

                                      I fully support and condone republicans shooting other republicans.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      5
                                      • B bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world

                                        Yeah, but what it says about you as a human being is far, FAR worse. Youre getting joy, not just from his death, but the suffering of his wife and children. I 100% understand people being ambivalent. But seeing joy in peoples posts and comments is a real mask off moment for the internet.

                                        Its like watching Israel commit genocide, and then using the same reasoning that the nazis used on them. Honestly, you all need to check exactly why you are celebrating the death of a human being, just because you dont agree with him. You might just find youve been every bit as radicalised as those you hate.

                                        And while you might not be advocating murder, theres many, MANY, more who are. JK herself has had her name bounded about as being “next”. This is what happens when you start cheering for people being murdered. And its high time the “left” started to remember that they have just as many unhinged fuckwits in their ranks as the “right” does.

                                        J This user is from outside of this forum
                                        J This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jellygoose@lemmy.ca
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #76

                                        Did you cry when Saddam was executed?

                                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                                        5
                                        • S samuelrjankis@sh.itjust.works

                                          Pierre and Scheer has a lot to say about freedom of speech but get real quiet when Canadians get threatened.

                                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                                          1ostA5tro6yne
                                          wrote on last edited by chocosoldier@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                                          #77

                                          im so fucking tired of “wahhh violence categorically bad.” violence is a tool. there are times and places that it is the appropriate tool to use. like when a totalitarian regime is crystallizing, for example.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          7

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post