Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Lasers match common herbicides at zapping East Coast weeds

Lasers match common herbicides at zapping East Coast weeds

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
science
11 Posts 7 Posters 21 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C This user is from outside of this forum
    C This user is from outside of this forum
    cm0002@lemmy.world
    wrote on last edited by
    #1
    This post did not contain any content.
    P B 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    91
    • ScienceS Science shared this topic on
    • C cm0002@lemmy.world
      This post did not contain any content.
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      piranhaconda@mander.xyz
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Beautiful use of machine learning and machine vision, get out of here with facial recognition everywhere, give me shit like this

      Z cows_are_underrated@feddit.orgC 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      26
      • C cm0002@lemmy.world
        This post did not contain any content.
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        bigtrout75@lemmy.world
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Neat! Just make them solar and we’re set

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        8
        • B bigtrout75@lemmy.world

          Neat! Just make them solar and we’re set

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          shittybeatlesfcpres@lemmy.world
          wrote on last edited by shittybeatlesfcpres@lemmy.world
          #4

          Expert on shooting plants with laser beams here. Not quite enough power yet but a swappable battery system and a renewable source with a molten salt reactor could easily solve that problem.

          B anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.caA 2 Replies Last reply
          1
          9
          • P piranhaconda@mander.xyz

            Beautiful use of machine learning and machine vision, get out of here with facial recognition everywhere, give me shit like this

            Z This user is from outside of this forum
            Z This user is from outside of this forum
            zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Yes, more farmer johnny 5

            and less angry johnny 5

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            8
            • S shittybeatlesfcpres@lemmy.world

              Expert on shooting plants with laser beams here. Not quite enough power yet but a swappable battery system and a renewable source with a molten salt reactor could easily solve that problem.

              B This user is from outside of this forum
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              bigtrout75@lemmy.world
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Cool freaking tech. Build a micro version of this for yards that kills dandy lions and you’ll be rich.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • S shittybeatlesfcpres@lemmy.world

                Expert on shooting plants with laser beams here. Not quite enough power yet but a swappable battery system and a renewable source with a molten salt reactor could easily solve that problem.

                anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                EE (specifically embedded systems) here: just how much power do you need to zap a weed effectively? I would’ve thought a 40W laser would have been more than enough, and then scale that up for a hundred acres.

                only solar would be tough, but a small EV battery with a large panel in the sun for 12h seems like it’d be a lot of juice to run WeedZapper2000 with a topping off charge overnight, no?

                cows_are_underrated@feddit.orgC 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                1
                • P piranhaconda@mander.xyz

                  Beautiful use of machine learning and machine vision, get out of here with facial recognition everywhere, give me shit like this

                  cows_are_underrated@feddit.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cows_are_underrated@feddit.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  The Problem is, that these machines are hella expensive. I heard about costs of about 1.00.000€ + support. The one that I saw also has a newer version, that is probably even more expensive. Additionally you can not even closely match the efficency of herbicides, since equipment designed to apply herbicides has a working range of up to 40m and you can drive with much higher speeds.

                  So even tho laser looks like a promising solution they are not even anywhere close to being able to replace pesticides. There are other options for mechanically reducing weeds that may not match the efficiency, but are economically far more viable.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  2
                  • anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.caA anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca

                    EE (specifically embedded systems) here: just how much power do you need to zap a weed effectively? I would’ve thought a 40W laser would have been more than enough, and then scale that up for a hundred acres.

                    only solar would be tough, but a small EV battery with a large panel in the sun for 12h seems like it’d be a lot of juice to run WeedZapper2000 with a topping off charge overnight, no?

                    cows_are_underrated@feddit.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cows_are_underrated@feddit.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    The problem is not that you need to run a single laser, but multiple lasers in order to have some form of usable working width. Then you also need to power the cooling and the computer for the plant detection. If you build some form of small scale robot it should work with solar, but any machine that is designed to get the job done relatively quick probably won’t work.

                    anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.caA 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    2
                    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.orgC cows_are_underrated@feddit.org

                      The problem is not that you need to run a single laser, but multiple lasers in order to have some form of usable working width. Then you also need to power the cooling and the computer for the plant detection. If you build some form of small scale robot it should work with solar, but any machine that is designed to get the job done relatively quick probably won’t work.

                      anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                      anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                      anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Interesting; I thought this worked be a single high power laser (or a few) with galvanometers for targeting.

                      Would love to learn more about how it’s really done (as opposed to how I imagine it’d be done).

                      cows_are_underrated@feddit.orgC 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.caA anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca

                        Interesting; I thought this worked be a single high power laser (or a few) with galvanometers for targeting.

                        Would love to learn more about how it’s really done (as opposed to how I imagine it’d be done).

                        cows_are_underrated@feddit.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cows_are_underrated@feddit.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        The problem with a single laser is, that, in order to achieve bigger working widths, it would have to be able to rotate very accurately, very fast and not shoot your crops at the same time. Especially the latter makes it impossible to use a single one.

                        You also dont have to “burn” the weeds. It is enough to destroy certain cells to stop them from growing.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        2

                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post