Because it is a 60€ (base version) game, and not a 20€ Early Access. People expect a minimum of quality for that price.

Holy crap.

Is this basically Concord of 2025?

Ah true, I’ve just accepted it as the norm, if I have issues with a game, I’ll either refund or wait for a patch to fix it then play it.

The patch they did today seems to have fixed the crash I was having

I didn’t play Concord, but from my experience of the first 2 or 3 hours is that starts as mostly a movie, you are just watching what is happening in the cutscene, you gotta pay attention cause it moves pretty fast through the story, occasionally killing, racing, minigame in-between the cutscenes.

You eventually get access to build mode that lets you build anything in the world, they have logic nodes for doing gameplay scripting and alot of assets to use, though I only played it with for a few minutes, it takes awhile to get to it in the story I think.

it looks like there’s plans for a sort of UGC shared multiplayer type deal, but it’s listed as single player so idk

“developer”

“working”

“fix”

Lot of heavy lifting here.

I don’t think the issues with Concord had a single thing to do with the performance. That was basically the single way the game was fine.

You know it’s bad when Sony is issuing refunds.

I’m not sure either. The game looks like something that doesn’t interest me at all, but there is some concerted effort to dismiss it. You’ve gotten quite a few down votes just for saying you enjoyed it.

Ah yes, the Cyberpunk special

I saw this game last week at SGF and thought it might have potential, looks a little rough, but should be good by launch. Looks fun enough for the first time reveal. Little did I know that it was literally coming out in less than a week.