Mieko Kawakami got no chill yo https://lithub.com/a-feminist-critique-of-murakami-novels-with-murakami-himself/
-
Mieko Kawakami got no chill yo https://lithub.com/a-feminist-critique-of-murakami-novels-with-murakami-himself/
-
Mieko Kawakami got no chill yo https://lithub.com/a-feminist-critique-of-murakami-novels-with-murakami-himself/
I rest my case:
> MK: I’m talking about the large number of female characters who exist solely to fulfill a sexual function. On the one hand, your work is boundlessly imaginative when it comes to plots, to wells, and to men, but the same can’t be said for their relationships with women. It’s not possible for these women to exist on their own. And while female protagonists, or even supporting characters, may enjoy a moderate degree of self-expression, thanks to their relative independence, there’s a persistent tendency for women to be sacrificed for the sake of the male leads. So the question is, why is it that women are so often called upon to play this role in Murakami novels?
-
I rest my case:
> MK: I’m talking about the large number of female characters who exist solely to fulfill a sexual function. On the one hand, your work is boundlessly imaginative when it comes to plots, to wells, and to men, but the same can’t be said for their relationships with women. It’s not possible for these women to exist on their own. And while female protagonists, or even supporting characters, may enjoy a moderate degree of self-expression, thanks to their relative independence, there’s a persistent tendency for women to be sacrificed for the sake of the male leads. So the question is, why is it that women are so often called upon to play this role in Murakami novels?
These patterns are old, and often very ugly (speaking as someone who studies German folk tales). We need to do better.