Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
177 Posts 130 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

    I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

    Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

    Isaac Ji KuoI This user is from outside of this forum
    Isaac Ji KuoI This user is from outside of this forum
    Isaac Ji Kuo
    wrote last edited by
    #51

    @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social I have three non-techbro mentality/religion reasons for this:

    1) Distract from Tesla's poor earnings
    2) Distract from the Epstein files
    3) Bezos says he's going to launch zillions of data center satellites so Musk just wants to nab scamee money for it first

    But yeah, also Musk is a moron.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

      Link Preview Image
      SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

      In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

      favicon

      PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

      John Q McDonaldJ This user is from outside of this forum
      John Q McDonaldJ This user is from outside of this forum
      John Q McDonald
      wrote last edited by
      #52

      @sundogplanets Skynet

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

        Link Preview Image
        SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

        In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

        favicon

        PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

        Emilio ʕ̡̢̡ʘ̅͟͜͡ʘ̲̅ʔ̢̡̢M This user is from outside of this forum
        Emilio ʕ̡̢̡ʘ̅͟͜͡ʘ̲̅ʔ̢̡̢M This user is from outside of this forum
        Emilio ʕ̡̢̡ʘ̅͟͜͡ʘ̲̅ʔ̢̡̢
        wrote last edited by
        #53

        @sundogplanets @Nonya_Bidniss 😲😲😲

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

          Link Preview Image
          SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

          In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

          favicon

          PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          Chris Green
          wrote last edited by
          #54

          @sundogplanets That's what everyone in datacenters wants - unfixable latency and multimillion dollar costs to replace equipment..

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

            Link Preview Image
            SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

            In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

            favicon

            PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

            Fight Back or Move OverP This user is from outside of this forum
            Fight Back or Move OverP This user is from outside of this forum
            Fight Back or Move Over
            wrote last edited by
            #55

            @sundogplanets Trash filling space with trash.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

              Link Preview Image
              SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

              In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

              favicon

              PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

              D This user is from outside of this forum
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              David
              wrote last edited by
              #56

              @sundogplanets Just in case anyone needs to see it: this can't work with today's or even near-future technology.

              Link Preview Image
              AI data centres — in SPACE! Why DCs in space can’t work

              Spending all the money you have and all the money you can get and all the money you can promise has a number of side effects, such as gigantic data centres full of high-power chips just to run lyin…

              favicon

              Pivot to AI (pivot-to-ai.com)

              #OrbitalAI #DataCentersInSpaceCantWork

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mkjM mkj

                @nev Or when you're reading science fiction which was intended to be a warning, and treating it as something that should be done because it's Cool™!

                "I have read Do Not Build The Torment Nexus and decided to dedicate the rest of my life to ensuring that we *never* have a Torment Nexus" said no billionaire ever.

                @sundogplanets

                neville parkN This user is from outside of this forum
                neville parkN This user is from outside of this forum
                neville park
                wrote last edited by
                #57

                @mkj @sundogplanets god knows the Western Canon™ is stodgy and Eurocentric and male-centric and all that, but like, Greek legends and the Bible and such give you the 101 versions that science fiction writers are adapting/riffing on/inspired by. what i'm trying to say is, even the most basic bitch humanities education could have helped these people

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                  What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                  Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                  Link Preview Image
                  SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                  In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                  favicon

                  PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                  SkjeggtrollS This user is from outside of this forum
                  SkjeggtrollS This user is from outside of this forum
                  Skjeggtroll
                  wrote last edited by
                  #58

                  @sundogplanets

                  "From the vanity of the tech-bros who've read science-fiction but not understood it, O Lord, deliver us."

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                    Link Preview Image
                    SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                    In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                    favicon

                    PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                    BelakorN This user is from outside of this forum
                    BelakorN This user is from outside of this forum
                    Belakor
                    wrote last edited by
                    #59

                    @sundogplanets This is just a VC scam.
                    1. The timeline on launching a million satellites, even "small" ones is decades.

                    2. Near vacuum isn't a magical environment for heat management.

                    3. Power from where exactly? And don't say sunlight cause the amount of capture panels needed would be an order of magnitude more material to power a data center.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                      Link Preview Image
                      SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                      In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                      favicon

                      PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                      CountMoosferatuC This user is from outside of this forum
                      CountMoosferatuC This user is from outside of this forum
                      CountMoosferatu
                      wrote last edited by
                      #60

                      @sundogplanets Bye, nice telescope views, etc. Hello, Kessler syndrome.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                        Link Preview Image
                        SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                        In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                        favicon

                        PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                        ティージェーグレェT This user is from outside of this forum
                        ティージェーグレェT This user is from outside of this forum
                        ティージェーグレェ
                        wrote last edited by
                        #61
                        I noticed in the credits of re-watching the 4K remastering of Hard Boiled that there was some security company called Starlink, decades ago. fElon Musk couldn't even pick a name that hadn't already been used before.

                        IMHO, it would probably be cheaper to run fiber to the home, even in the most remote rural areas, than to pollute our skies with satellites for high latency Internet access. But, what do I know? I think last time I checked a 50km spool of single mode fiber could be bought for under $1000.
                        UkeleleEricU 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                          Link Preview Image
                          SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                          In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                          favicon

                          PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                          W6KMEW This user is from outside of this forum
                          W6KMEW This user is from outside of this forum
                          W6KME
                          wrote last edited by
                          #62

                          @sundogplanets The night sky will be spectacular for several decades as all the smashed bits fall back to Earth.

                          GhostOnTheHalfShellG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                            Link Preview Image
                            SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                            In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                            favicon

                            PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                            BuckRogers1965B This user is from outside of this forum
                            BuckRogers1965B This user is from outside of this forum
                            BuckRogers1965
                            wrote last edited by
                            #63

                            @sundogplanets

                            That would disintegrate into shrapnel in days.

                            The Kessler syndrome, also known as the Kessler effect,[1][2] collisional cascading, or ablation cascade, is a scenario proposed by NASA scientists Donald J. Kessler and Burton G. Cour-Palais in 1978. It describes a situation in which the density of objects in low Earth orbit (LEO) becomes so high due to space pollution that collisions between these objects cascade, exponentially increasing the amount of space debris over time.[3] This proliferation
                            ...

                            collisions would accumulate faster than atmospheric drag could remove them.[4] The Kessler syndrome underscores the critical need for effective space traffic management and collision avoidance strategies to ensure the long-term viability of space exploration and use.

                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome#:~:text=The%20theoretical%20cascading%20Kessler%20syndrome,Starlink%2C%20the%20constellation%20of%20SpaceX.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • PalmAndNeedleP PalmAndNeedle

                              @sundogplanets I do feel like we're on the path to Neil Stephenson's Seven Eves somehow

                              Deborah Preuss, pcc 🇨🇦D This user is from outside of this forum
                              Deborah Preuss, pcc 🇨🇦D This user is from outside of this forum
                              Deborah Preuss, pcc 🇨🇦
                              wrote last edited by
                              #64

                              @PalmAndNeedle @sundogplanets I think I've read that, ages ago. Time for a reread, maybe! My library has it online.

                              PalmAndNeedleP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                Link Preview Image
                                SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                                In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                                favicon

                                PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                                GhostOnTheHalfShellG This user is from outside of this forum
                                GhostOnTheHalfShellG This user is from outside of this forum
                                GhostOnTheHalfShell
                                wrote last edited by
                                #65

                                @sundogplanets

                                If you understand anything about the giant CF of data centers right now this is just the stupidest idea ever.

                                First, the lifespan of these chips runs on the order of 18 months before they are considered obsolete and the chips fry very quickly so there is a very high failure rate.

                                Also, the data centers power is determined by the networking of all the components in the data center.

                                Ask yourself if RF communication broadcast between satellites can work like wires

                                Ian Douglas ScottI Sean FenianZ 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                  "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                  THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                  GhostOnTheHalfShellG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  GhostOnTheHalfShellG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  GhostOnTheHalfShell
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #66

                                  @sundogplanets

                                  Well, yeah, the idea of just you know oh we’re going to now reach this science fiction milestone because reasons.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • W6KMEW W6KME

                                    @sundogplanets The night sky will be spectacular for several decades as all the smashed bits fall back to Earth.

                                    GhostOnTheHalfShellG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    GhostOnTheHalfShellG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    GhostOnTheHalfShell
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #67

                                    @W6KME @sundogplanets

                                    Just so long as you remember to dodge them. The fireworks SpaceX provided last year over the Caribbean did endanger commercial flights. Now it would be brought everywhere on the planet.

                                    W6KMEW Kid ManiaC 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                      "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                      THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                      JPJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      JPJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      JP
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #68

                                      @sundogplanets the performance of total seriousness, no matter how absurd the goal, is critical to tech oligarchs' "fake it til you rule the world" strategy. it rarely survives contact with reality but the damage it does is of course very real.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                        "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                        THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        slash
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #69

                                        @sundogplanets Sounds like they used AI to generate this. The Kardashev scale is a classification of _civilization_, not "situation". I see this sort of auto-correct in lots of AI slop.

                                        Recent news articles kept referring to Tom Human as the Border Guard.

                                        If this wasn't so serious, I'd laugh.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • GhostOnTheHalfShellG GhostOnTheHalfShell

                                          @W6KME @sundogplanets

                                          Just so long as you remember to dodge them. The fireworks SpaceX provided last year over the Caribbean did endanger commercial flights. Now it would be brought everywhere on the planet.

                                          W6KMEW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          W6KMEW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          W6KME
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #70

                                          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets SpaceX's unwillingness to be good citizens, and the US government's unwillingness to do anything about it...people are going to die eventually, and possibly a lot of them.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post