Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT.

UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
117 Posts 60 Posters 6 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

    RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

    UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

    *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

    The Penguin of EvilE This user is from outside of this forum
    The Penguin of EvilE This user is from outside of this forum
    The Penguin of Evil
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    @cstross just to point out that Linux, Android and other things have a VPN built in so the results will actually be even more idiotic.
    It will also stop trans kids using Tor to get info, something I am sure labour think is a huge win

    Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷L FonantF 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

      RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

      UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

      *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

      mbpazM This user is from outside of this forum
      mbpazM This user is from outside of this forum
      mbpaz
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      @cstross Ethical issues aside - how are m2m VPNs expected to validate their age?

      "hi, I'm an environment monitoring device and was born barely 6 months ago, but I swear I'm old enough to use my built-in VPN to access my MQTT server"

      NiniN UilebheistU 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

        RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

        UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

        *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

        ChrysanthosC This user is from outside of this forum
        ChrysanthosC This user is from outside of this forum
        Chrysanthos
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        @cstross I wish I had any faith in these petitions

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • The Penguin of EvilE The Penguin of Evil

          @cstross just to point out that Linux, Android and other things have a VPN built in so the results will actually be even more idiotic.
          It will also stop trans kids using Tor to get info, something I am sure labour think is a huge win

          Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷L This user is from outside of this forum
          Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷L This user is from outside of this forum
          Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          @etchedpixels @cstross A lot of the recent legislative moves in the UK & EU both are rather highly incompatible with the use of "unlocked" Open Source systems.

          But a bootloader-locked Android could easily enforce this rule.

          I'm wondering at which time running a FLOSS Operating System on your devices will require a license/permit.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Capricious DayC Capricious Day

            @cstross I sort of wonder how my extremely risk averse, security conscious employer who depends on VPNs is going to react to this

            Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
            Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
            Charlie Stross
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            @capriciousday Like banks and other financial institutions who require their employees to use them when working out of the office, or over wifi *within* the office.

            HighlandLawyerH 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

              @cstross it's really not that useful a first step.

              It's just what the VPN industry has drummed into us with ubiquitous marketing.

              Just install the "tor browser". It's free, cross platform and provides much more privacy than any VPN.

              If you need true anonymity then use a privacy focused OS like "tails" - also free and uses TOR internally

              Even better, these tools cannot be blocked or gated by governments.

              VPNs are largely useless things sold by people who want your money.

              Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
              Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
              Oliver Schönrock
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @cstross vpns have their place in corporate networks.

              There they provide secure access to internal resources for remote workers.

              They are all but useless for personal privacy / anonymity.

              So while I agree with the principle of your objection to govts gating services - it is actually a faux battle based on misinformation by the VPN industry.

              Peter SommerladP ˈdälfən™🐬 💥 🌊D A 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • mbpazM mbpaz

                @cstross Ethical issues aside - how are m2m VPNs expected to validate their age?

                "hi, I'm an environment monitoring device and was born barely 6 months ago, but I swear I'm old enough to use my built-in VPN to access my MQTT server"

                NiniN This user is from outside of this forum
                NiniN This user is from outside of this forum
                Nini
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                @mbpaz @cstross Are you suggesting this legislation is being brought in without any technical knowledge just like the Online Safety Act was?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                  @Nicovel0 Yes, but it's still toxic and dangerous (and will implicitly criminalize unregistered VPN users).

                  JesseJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  JesseJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  Jesse
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  @cstross @Nicovel0
                  Also, I'm only going on my memories of being a kid in the mid-late 90's and the word of mouth proliferation of Napster/shareware, but hard to imagine this not just resulting in kids teaching each other how to use TOR

                  ...not that opposite effect is new to this kind of legislation

                  DanielD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                    RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                    UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                    *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                    kbalK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kbalK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kbal
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    For those who don’t believe that an ordinary commercial VPN service can improve your privacy, here’s a simple experiment you can run at home: Get two similar computers, one with a VPN and one without. Use them both to download Hollywood movies through bittorrent, and see which one results in notifications of incoming lawsuits from movie studios.

                    Fortunately, there’s no need to do this experiment yourself. Millions of people around the world have already done it for you.

                    David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

                      @cstross vpns have their place in corporate networks.

                      There they provide secure access to internal resources for remote workers.

                      They are all but useless for personal privacy / anonymity.

                      So while I agree with the principle of your objection to govts gating services - it is actually a faux battle based on misinformation by the VPN industry.

                      Peter SommerladP This user is from outside of this forum
                      Peter SommerladP This user is from outside of this forum
                      Peter Sommerlad
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      @oschonrock @cstross
                      my major private use case is to circumvent geo blocking of video streaming and access to my home lan

                      Oliver SchönrockO 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                        RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                        UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                        *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                        TiggyT This user is from outside of this forum
                        TiggyT This user is from outside of this forum
                        Tiggy
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        @cstross

                        And of course, while inconveniencing or worse ordinary people, it won't stop a determined teenager.
                        Same with physical ID, the ones they want to stop get around the new rules but people in general get more problems upon problems.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Peter SommerladP Peter Sommerlad

                          @oschonrock @cstross
                          my major private use case is to circumvent geo blocking of video streaming and access to my home lan

                          Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                          Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                          Oliver Schönrock
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20

                          @PeterSommerlad @cstross

                          Well the "home lan" is effectively the "corporate use case" I described, just for advanced IT folk.. (I used to do the same).

                          The geoblocking use case is "fair" in the sense that it "just works", but almost certainly contravenes the streaming service providers T&Cs. It does nothing for privacy, since you clearly log into these services.

                          (Psst: I also use TOR to get around geoblocking.. not quite as convenient, but free)

                          Peter SommerladP ZimmieB 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

                            @PeterSommerlad @cstross

                            Well the "home lan" is effectively the "corporate use case" I described, just for advanced IT folk.. (I used to do the same).

                            The geoblocking use case is "fair" in the sense that it "just works", but almost certainly contravenes the streaming service providers T&Cs. It does nothing for privacy, since you clearly log into these services.

                            (Psst: I also use TOR to get around geoblocking.. not quite as convenient, but free)

                            Peter SommerladP This user is from outside of this forum
                            Peter SommerladP This user is from outside of this forum
                            Peter Sommerlad
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21

                            @oschonrock @cstross
                            i want to watch my streaming abos when traveling without having to download things at home. in Switzerland I pay the highest fees anyway.

                            Oliver SchönrockO 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                              RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                              UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                              *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                              davecbD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davecbD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davecb
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22

                              @cstross Hmmn, Dave has connected to Royal Bank. I thought he banked at Scotiabank. I wonder if he's up to something? (Yes, actually. diversification and a better deal.)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                                RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                                UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                                *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                                Fazal MajidF This user is from outside of this forum
                                Fazal MajidF This user is from outside of this forum
                                Fazal Majid
                                wrote last edited by
                                #23

                                @cstross you can run your own VPN, I’ve automated the process in https://github.com/fazalmajid/edgewalker

                                At that point, *you* are the VPN provider and in compliance. Until the next brain dead decision the parasites descended from thugs in the House of Drolls come up with.

                                Charlie StrossC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Fazal MajidF Fazal Majid

                                  @cstross you can run your own VPN, I’ve automated the process in https://github.com/fazalmajid/edgewalker

                                  At that point, *you* are the VPN provider and in compliance. Until the next brain dead decision the parasites descended from thugs in the House of Drolls come up with.

                                  Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Charlie Stross
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #24

                                  @fazalmajid Right, so that would require me to learn and install OpenBSD and a full stack. (The last BSD I used in anger was SunOS 4.1.3.)

                                  Fazal MajidF 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Peter SommerladP Peter Sommerlad

                                    @oschonrock @cstross
                                    i want to watch my streaming abos when traveling without having to download things at home. in Switzerland I pay the highest fees anyway.

                                    Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Oliver Schönrock
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #25

                                    @PeterSommerlad @cstross

                                    So in the context of this discussion, and if you lived in the UK, would you object to being age/identity verified when purchasing your vpn subscription?

                                    It is almost certainly not an annonymous transaction anyway, as those are very very difficult to execute..?

                                    FonantF 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                                      RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                                      UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                                      *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                                      ElricE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ElricE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Elric
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #26

                                      @cstross It would be nice if the government would encourage parents to do the actual parenting, instead of trying to force their idea of parenting down everyone's throats.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                                        @Nicovel0 Yes, but it's still toxic and dangerous (and will implicitly criminalize unregistered VPN users).

                                        Nicovel0 🍉N This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Nicovel0 🍉N This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Nicovel0 🍉
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #27

                                        @cstross oh absolutely, I have signed three petition. I don’t expect it will have any effect but we have to try.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • JesseJ Jesse

                                          @cstross @Nicovel0
                                          Also, I'm only going on my memories of being a kid in the mid-late 90's and the word of mouth proliferation of Napster/shareware, but hard to imagine this not just resulting in kids teaching each other how to use TOR

                                          ...not that opposite effect is new to this kind of legislation

                                          DanielD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          DanielD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Daniel
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #28

                                          @jaawerth @cstross @Nicovel0 the amendment does not appear to define "virtual private network", so ... does it include TOR? SSH SOCKS proxy? L2TP? PPPoE?

                                          Nicovel0 🍉N The DoctorD Only OhmO 3 Replies Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post