Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Reminder that in the UK in 1900, before mass vaccination for childhood diseases began, 20% of all babies died before their fifth birthday (from diseases we currently vaccinate them against).

Reminder that in the UK in 1900, before mass vaccination for childhood diseases began, 20% of all babies died before their fifth birthday (from diseases we currently vaccinate them against).

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
129 Posts 74 Posters 27 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • axel.A axel.

    @cstross Not to put a too fine point on that, but people in iron lungs also don’t breed easily.

    Pure eugenics.

    AaronH This user is from outside of this forum
    AaronH This user is from outside of this forum
    Aaron
    wrote last edited by
    #94

    @axeln @cstross It is all eugenics, zero compassion. And for what? So future generations can have better immune systems? We can do that right fucking now, with technology, and *without* sacrificing babies.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Martin EscardoM Martin Escardo

      @cstross Unfortunately, there is nothing that will convince vaccine skeptics.

      I once watched the BBC programme "Unvaccinated" by Hannah Fry, who meets seven unvaccinated people in an experiment.

      She showed them the evidence, they slowly started to believe the evidence, or said that they did, but they remained skeptics at the end of the programme.

      Link Preview Image
      BBC Two - Unvaccinated

      Hannah Fry meets seven unvaccinated people to find out why so many haven't had a vaccine.

      favicon

      BBC (www.bbc.co.uk)

      synlogic4242S This user is from outside of this forum
      synlogic4242S This user is from outside of this forum
      synlogic4242
      wrote last edited by
      #95

      @MartinEscardo @cstross there is at least one coordinated "vaccines are bad" misinfo/disinfo/propaganda op thats been running and evolving since 2013 at least, based out of Russia and targetting Americans and Europeans with very similar points and techniques, just localized to each target audience. I once did some work to try help counter-acting it. for the US State Dept. you know, as one does lol

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Paul WalkerA Paul Walker

        @bjn @cstross @lauren It's not, but I'm starting to think that the proponents of "stop vaccinating, natural selection!" should be left in a wilderness area for a week or two, on their own, with whatever tools they can make. Natural selection, right?

        AnthonyA This user is from outside of this forum
        AnthonyA This user is from outside of this forum
        Anthony
        wrote last edited by
        #96
        @arafel@mas.to @bjn@mstdn.social @cstross@wandering.shop @lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org It's not a misapprehension of how evolution works, something that could be corrected by real-world experience.

        It's eugenics. It's an ideology with internal contradictions large enough to fly a Boeing through, and one that unfortunately many liberals share (for evidence see US COVID death toll 2020-2024). You only need to see one picture of Francis Galton to recognize that the folks pushing this ideology would not fare well were its dictates evenly applied. But this sort of thing is always about forceful exclusion.
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Darwin WoodkaD Darwin Woodka

          @timo21 @cstross

          My guess is millions of people will decide not to bother paying their federal taxes this year.

          FarhadF This user is from outside of this forum
          FarhadF This user is from outside of this forum
          Farhad
          wrote last edited by
          #97

          @darwinwoodka

          Ha,
          Ha,
          Ha,
          Ha!

          That was a good joke.

          @timo21 @cstross

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

            RE: https://mastodon.laurenweinstein.org/@lauren/115963873612884664

            Reminder that in the UK in 1900, before mass vaccination for childhood diseases began, 20% of all babies died before their fifth birthday (from diseases we currently vaccinate them against).

            RFK jr's appointee wants to kill roughly 20% of all newborn Americans "to improve the breed" or something.

            (Not including those paralysed for life by polio.)

            SchroedingerS This user is from outside of this forum
            SchroedingerS This user is from outside of this forum
            Schroedinger
            wrote last edited by
            #98

            @cstross I mean, Polio is a disease I am very interested in. The vaccine came shortly before I was born, so I was one of the generation who felt very fortunate to have it.

            And my wife had an aunt who had been paralysed for life by Polio. I knew her - she was one of the very lucky ones. She lived. She was able to have a fairly normal life - married and had children.

            I lived at a time when vaccines were saving so many lives. So many thousands of lives.

            And this fuckbrained heap of scum wants to turn all that back. The sooner he rots in hell, the better.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • GraydonG Graydon

              @petealexharris It is, alas, nowhere near 99%.

              The distinction may have operational utility in opposing their policies; for example, the "all these babies will die! look at the tombstones in old graveyards!" response to anti-vax policies functions to confirm the objectives and purposes of the anti-vax movement. It's about killing babies; that's what it wants. Telling its members that babies will die is not an effective means of dissuasion.

              @cstross

              dr2chaseD This user is from outside of this forum
              dr2chaseD This user is from outside of this forum
              dr2chase
              wrote last edited by
              #99

              @graydon @petealexharris @cstross but the set of babies that seem to end up killed by their policies is often their own. Conning *other people* into not vaccinating their children might make sense, but so far, it's mostly their own political supporters (whom of course they might regard as mere meat for the grinder).

              To me it looks like panic at the loss of white majority and political power, and they are flailing, destructively, hoping to blow up the world so that the rubble will land "better".

              GraydonG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                RE: https://mastodon.laurenweinstein.org/@lauren/115963873612884664

                Reminder that in the UK in 1900, before mass vaccination for childhood diseases began, 20% of all babies died before their fifth birthday (from diseases we currently vaccinate them against).

                RFK jr's appointee wants to kill roughly 20% of all newborn Americans "to improve the breed" or something.

                (Not including those paralysed for life by polio.)

                The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                The Doctor
                wrote last edited by
                #100

                @cstross Social Darwinism might have been discredited, but that doesn't mean anything to people trying to apply it here.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Bruno NicolettiB Bruno Nicoletti

                  @cstross @lauren They could just go full Spartan and leave new borns out overnight so that only the “strongest” survive.

                  (Note, this is not a good idea on so many levels).

                  The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                  The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                  The Doctor
                  wrote last edited by
                  #101

                  @bjn @cstross @lauren Give them time.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Alex FeinmanA Alex Feinman

                    @arafel @bjn @cstross @lauren This is the same population who stockpiled canned goods for their imaginary apocalypse but forgot to pack can openers, right?

                    The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                    The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                    The Doctor
                    wrote last edited by
                    #102

                    @afeinman @arafel @bjn @cstross @lauren Yes.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • MidgePhotoP MidgePhoto

                      @Infoseepage
                      Tempting to advise a more permanent placement.

                      MidgePhotoP This user is from outside of this forum
                      MidgePhotoP This user is from outside of this forum
                      MidgePhoto
                      wrote last edited by
                      #103

                      @Infoseepage ...but that is (also) corrosive to the rest of us.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Bart SchullerB Bart Schuller

                        @cstross That means they’ll need even more white babies. Don’t these people talk to each other?

                        no brain no painN This user is from outside of this forum
                        no brain no painN This user is from outside of this forum
                        no brain no pain
                        wrote last edited by
                        #104

                        @bart @cstross they don’t have time to talk, they have to make babies 🤣

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Sweet GentlemanA A Sweet Gentleman

                          @Infoseepage @cstross Same.
                          And I've 0 tolerance for parents who literally abuse their children just to prove something: "I do my own research" "It's a government conspiracy" "It's MY child I do whatever I want with it"...

                          Elon Muksis 🇺🇦 🇵🇸 🇪🇺B This user is from outside of this forum
                          Elon Muksis 🇺🇦 🇵🇸 🇪🇺B This user is from outside of this forum
                          Elon Muksis 🇺🇦 🇵🇸 🇪🇺
                          wrote last edited by
                          #105

                          @aSweetGentleman @Infoseepage @cstross http://whatstheharm.net/

                          A Sweet GentlemanA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dr2chaseD dr2chase

                            @graydon @petealexharris @cstross but the set of babies that seem to end up killed by their policies is often their own. Conning *other people* into not vaccinating their children might make sense, but so far, it's mostly their own political supporters (whom of course they might regard as mere meat for the grinder).

                            To me it looks like panic at the loss of white majority and political power, and they are flailing, destructively, hoping to blow up the world so that the rubble will land "better".

                            GraydonG This user is from outside of this forum
                            GraydonG This user is from outside of this forum
                            Graydon
                            wrote last edited by
                            #106

                            @dr2chase Reducing white women to the status of chattel is important to the project; they can't do that without reversing the demographic transition as it applies to white people, too. And that unconcerned "kid died of measles" couple may well be representative.

                            They've deeply internalized "women, cattle, and slaves" and a Late Romantic "survival of the fittest" which ignores the actual environment and supposes some ideal person. Facts are not much involved anywhere.

                            @petealexharris @cstross

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • InfoseepageI Infoseepage

                              @cstross People who are anti-vaccination for whatever fruitloops reason need to spend some quality time in old churchyards looking at monuments to dead children put up by bereft parents.

                              Misuse CaseM This user is from outside of this forum
                              Misuse CaseM This user is from outside of this forum
                              Misuse Case
                              wrote last edited by
                              #107

                              @Infoseepage @cstross It seems like the generations that remember losing siblings, cousins, and friends to what are now vaccine-preventable diseases have mostly passed away so we’ve lost firsthand accounts of what it was like.

                              My late paternal grandpa, from the Silent Generation, lost one of his school friends to measles.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)D David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

                                @arafel @cstross @bjn @lauren

                                Playing Russian Roulette with a six shooter would give them slightly better odds than they want to give children. Load another couple of chambers with blanks (won't kill, will burst an eardrump) and you might be getting close.

                                zevZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                zevZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                zev
                                wrote last edited by
                                #108

                                @david_chisnall @arafel @cstross @bjn @lauren Tangential, but perhaps worth noting: blanks can indeed kill at sufficiently close range.

                                Though yeah, it'd certainly be nice if the antivaxers could experiment on themselves in isolation without inflicting the effects on the rest of society.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Elon Muksis 🇺🇦 🇵🇸 🇪🇺B Elon Muksis 🇺🇦 🇵🇸 🇪🇺

                                  @aSweetGentleman @Infoseepage @cstross http://whatstheharm.net/

                                  A Sweet GentlemanA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  A Sweet GentlemanA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  A Sweet Gentleman
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #109

                                  @bhasic This is scary.
                                  @Infoseepage @cstross

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                                    RE: https://mastodon.laurenweinstein.org/@lauren/115963873612884664

                                    Reminder that in the UK in 1900, before mass vaccination for childhood diseases began, 20% of all babies died before their fifth birthday (from diseases we currently vaccinate them against).

                                    RFK jr's appointee wants to kill roughly 20% of all newborn Americans "to improve the breed" or something.

                                    (Not including those paralysed for life by polio.)

                                    G This user is from outside of this forum
                                    G This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gwenh
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #110

                                    @cstross I am not a medical professional, nor do I wish to play devil's advocate, but common sense tells us that at the beginning of the 20th century, hygiene standards and knowledge of medicines were much lower, so it is difficult to assess the impact of one factor or another on child mortality.

                                    K Charlie StrossC 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G gwenh

                                      @cstross I am not a medical professional, nor do I wish to play devil's advocate, but common sense tells us that at the beginning of the 20th century, hygiene standards and knowledge of medicines were much lower, so it is difficult to assess the impact of one factor or another on child mortality.

                                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Katie F
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #111

                                      @gwenh @cstross
                                      so the death rate in the 1900's was after advances had been made in germ theory and communicable diseases.

                                      It was even higher before 1880.

                                      K 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • K Katie F

                                        @gwenh @cstross
                                        so the death rate in the 1900's was after advances had been made in germ theory and communicable diseases.

                                        It was even higher before 1880.

                                        K This user is from outside of this forum
                                        K This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Katie F
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #112

                                        @gwenh @cstross
                                        https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7086672/

                                        "The infant mortality rate in 1880 in New York City, a particularly crowded urban area, was as high as 288 per 1000 live-born infants, primarily related to various infectious processes. Infectious diseases such as diarrhea, diphtheria, scarlet fever and tuberculosis dominated as the major causes of morbidity and mortality among children... "

                                        K 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • K Katie F

                                          @gwenh @cstross
                                          https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7086672/

                                          "The infant mortality rate in 1880 in New York City, a particularly crowded urban area, was as high as 288 per 1000 live-born infants, primarily related to various infectious processes. Infectious diseases such as diarrhea, diphtheria, scarlet fever and tuberculosis dominated as the major causes of morbidity and mortality among children... "

                                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Katie F
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #113

                                          @gwenh @cstross

                                          "..., and they had yet to be impacted by the just-emerging scientific base of medicine. The science of bacteriology, founded on the landmark discoveries of Louis Pasteur in Paris, Robert Koch in Berlin, and others in the early 1880s, had not yet impacted child health."

                                          K 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post