Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. But at least we only spent a trillion dollars on it, right?

But at least we only spent a trillion dollars on it, right?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
91 Posts 46 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

    What's a capital strike? That tends to be the question I get in response to this rant.

    You know what a labor strike is, right? It's wielding labor as power, by witholding it, as a bargaining tactic.

    A capital strike is the same thing, except with capital.

    JenniferplusplusJ This user is from outside of this forum
    JenniferplusplusJ This user is from outside of this forum
    Jenniferplusplus
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    But, you have to understand what capital actual is. It's not money. Money is a loose proxy for capital, but that's all. Really, capital is control over economic resources. Raw resources, sure. Big industrial machinery, sure. Networks of transportation and communication, yes. And labor.

    Money is kind of the exchange medium for all of that. But capital isn't the money, and it's not the resources. It's the power to distort how those resources are used and applied to suit your own interests, at the expense of the other people involved.

    JenniferplusplusJ Kevin P. FlemingK GregG 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

      What's a capital strike? That tends to be the question I get in response to this rant.

      You know what a labor strike is, right? It's wielding labor as power, by witholding it, as a bargaining tactic.

      A capital strike is the same thing, except with capital.

      mx alex tax1a - 2020 (5)A This user is from outside of this forum
      mx alex tax1a - 2020 (5)A This user is from outside of this forum
      mx alex tax1a - 2020 (5)
      wrote last edited by
      #8

      @jenniferplusplus we can imagine the people you're telling this to instinctively going "but theyre right to do that and the workers would be wrong to do that"

      JenniferplusplusJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

        But, you have to understand what capital actual is. It's not money. Money is a loose proxy for capital, but that's all. Really, capital is control over economic resources. Raw resources, sure. Big industrial machinery, sure. Networks of transportation and communication, yes. And labor.

        Money is kind of the exchange medium for all of that. But capital isn't the money, and it's not the resources. It's the power to distort how those resources are used and applied to suit your own interests, at the expense of the other people involved.

        JenniferplusplusJ This user is from outside of this forum
        JenniferplusplusJ This user is from outside of this forum
        Jenniferplusplus
        wrote last edited by
        #9

        That's part of what makes a capital strike non-obvious, if you don't already know what it looks like. It's not just sitting on the money and refusing to spend it. Because that's the one thing you literally can't do with capital. If you leave those resources idle, especially labor, it just goes and does its own thing. You lose control over it. If you just fire everyone, they eventually start working for themselves.

        So, to conduct a capital strike, you have to direct the capital toward useless things. Or actually destructive things, if you can manage it.

        And thus, AI had "basically zero" effect on the GDP. Because it's economically worthless activity for the purpose of keeping all the resources occupied so they can't be put to any other use.

        S 2qx2 PositivDenken 馃くZ Riley S. FaelanR Daniel GibsonD 12 Replies Last reply
        1
        0
        • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

          That's part of what makes a capital strike non-obvious, if you don't already know what it looks like. It's not just sitting on the money and refusing to spend it. Because that's the one thing you literally can't do with capital. If you leave those resources idle, especially labor, it just goes and does its own thing. You lose control over it. If you just fire everyone, they eventually start working for themselves.

          So, to conduct a capital strike, you have to direct the capital toward useless things. Or actually destructive things, if you can manage it.

          And thus, AI had "basically zero" effect on the GDP. Because it's economically worthless activity for the purpose of keeping all the resources occupied so they can't be put to any other use.

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          ShadSterling
          wrote last edited by
          #10

          @jenniferplusplus capitalism is always a denial-of-service attack on human potential; it鈥檚 not always this direct

          Violet MadderV Jo with elbows up & chin upJ 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

            But, you have to understand what capital actual is. It's not money. Money is a loose proxy for capital, but that's all. Really, capital is control over economic resources. Raw resources, sure. Big industrial machinery, sure. Networks of transportation and communication, yes. And labor.

            Money is kind of the exchange medium for all of that. But capital isn't the money, and it's not the resources. It's the power to distort how those resources are used and applied to suit your own interests, at the expense of the other people involved.

            Kevin P. FlemingK This user is from outside of this forum
            Kevin P. FlemingK This user is from outside of this forum
            Kevin P. Fleming
            wrote last edited by
            #11

            @jenniferplusplus And 'free market' means freedom to manage and deploy capital... not money.

            tuban_muzuruT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mx alex tax1a - 2020 (5)A mx alex tax1a - 2020 (5)

              @jenniferplusplus we can imagine the people you're telling this to instinctively going "but theyre right to do that and the workers would be wrong to do that"

              JenniferplusplusJ This user is from outside of this forum
              JenniferplusplusJ This user is from outside of this forum
              Jenniferplusplus
              wrote last edited by
              #12

              @atax1a Yeah, that is a problem

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

                Incidentally, if you divert a trillion dollars to something and get "basically zero" economic activity around it, that's not an investment. It's sabotage. It's become the chief manifestation of the capital strike we've all been enduring since, roughly, the first half of 2022.

                JPJ This user is from outside of this forum
                JPJ This user is from outside of this forum
                JP
                wrote last edited by
                #13

                @jenniferplusplus I'd been thinking of it as a particular form of what Marx called "fictitious capital" tied to a particular mass of political leverage (specifically, tech companies controlling our planet's information infrastructure) but the framing of a capital strike is interesting. and their demands have been clear more or less from the start.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

                  That's part of what makes a capital strike non-obvious, if you don't already know what it looks like. It's not just sitting on the money and refusing to spend it. Because that's the one thing you literally can't do with capital. If you leave those resources idle, especially labor, it just goes and does its own thing. You lose control over it. If you just fire everyone, they eventually start working for themselves.

                  So, to conduct a capital strike, you have to direct the capital toward useless things. Or actually destructive things, if you can manage it.

                  And thus, AI had "basically zero" effect on the GDP. Because it's economically worthless activity for the purpose of keeping all the resources occupied so they can't be put to any other use.

                  2qx2 This user is from outside of this forum
                  2qx2 This user is from outside of this forum
                  2qx
                  wrote last edited by
                  #14

                  @jenniferplusplus

                  They are fighting to make energy useless.

                  They are wasting energy to stall the transition off fossil fuels.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

                    That's part of what makes a capital strike non-obvious, if you don't already know what it looks like. It's not just sitting on the money and refusing to spend it. Because that's the one thing you literally can't do with capital. If you leave those resources idle, especially labor, it just goes and does its own thing. You lose control over it. If you just fire everyone, they eventually start working for themselves.

                    So, to conduct a capital strike, you have to direct the capital toward useless things. Or actually destructive things, if you can manage it.

                    And thus, AI had "basically zero" effect on the GDP. Because it's economically worthless activity for the purpose of keeping all the resources occupied so they can't be put to any other use.

                    PositivDenken 馃くZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    PositivDenken 馃くZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    PositivDenken 馃く
                    wrote last edited by
                    #15

                    @jenniferplusplus isn鈥檛 it that for instance the ancient Egyptian pyramids can be seen as similar efforts? Maybe a way to funnel excess wealth into sth that has zero value and is of no real world use.

                    JenniferplusplusJ KathmanduK Riley S. FaelanR George BG 4 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

                      Incidentally, if you divert a trillion dollars to something and get "basically zero" economic activity around it, that's not an investment. It's sabotage. It's become the chief manifestation of the capital strike we've all been enduring since, roughly, the first half of 2022.

                      UrzlG This user is from outside of this forum
                      UrzlG This user is from outside of this forum
                      Urzl
                      wrote last edited by
                      #16

                      @jenniferplusplus I've been thinking a little lately about the universal push to recategorize everything as Operational Expenses instead of CapEx and it occurred to me that CapEx is where you put the money to buy loyalty from execs at a new acquisition. It's turned into a slush fund for execs to bribe other execs.

                      JenniferplusplusJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • PositivDenken 馃くZ PositivDenken 馃く

                        @jenniferplusplus isn鈥檛 it that for instance the ancient Egyptian pyramids can be seen as similar efforts? Maybe a way to funnel excess wealth into sth that has zero value and is of no real world use.

                        JenniferplusplusJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        JenniferplusplusJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        Jenniferplusplus
                        wrote last edited by
                        #17

                        @zeank I don't know enough about ancient egypt to say with any confidence. But it does seem like a reasonable lens to view them through

                        Rachel RawlingsL 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

                          RE: https://mastodon.social/@nixCraft/116126552546349967

                          But at least we only spent a trillion dollars on it, right?

                          T Billy8 This user is from outside of this forum
                          T Billy8 This user is from outside of this forum
                          T Billy
                          wrote last edited by
                          #18

                          @jenniferplusplus AI and Bitcoin are nothing more than the Great American Grift. The AI Balloon is about to burst,just like the Tech Bubble did

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • UrzlG Urzl

                            @jenniferplusplus I've been thinking a little lately about the universal push to recategorize everything as Operational Expenses instead of CapEx and it occurred to me that CapEx is where you put the money to buy loyalty from execs at a new acquisition. It's turned into a slush fund for execs to bribe other execs.

                            JenniferplusplusJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            JenniferplusplusJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Jenniferplusplus
                            wrote last edited by
                            #19

                            @gooba42 uhhhhh, sort of. It's not really that they're bribing each other. Rather, it's that they're keeping that power concentrated in the capital sphere. Other capitalists like that, for obvious reasons, and reward each other for doing it.

                            Whatever arguments there are about capex vs opex will mainly boil down to whether they generally think that some use of money is a closed loop within the capital economy, or if it escapes into the real economy.

                            UrzlG 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

                              @gooba42 uhhhhh, sort of. It's not really that they're bribing each other. Rather, it's that they're keeping that power concentrated in the capital sphere. Other capitalists like that, for obvious reasons, and reward each other for doing it.

                              Whatever arguments there are about capex vs opex will mainly boil down to whether they generally think that some use of money is a closed loop within the capital economy, or if it escapes into the real economy.

                              UrzlG This user is from outside of this forum
                              UrzlG This user is from outside of this forum
                              Urzl
                              wrote last edited by
                              #20

                              @jenniferplusplus That's more or less what I was getting at but not particularly clearly.

                              It's helping to keep their class closed by reserving a significant slice of the pie for *only* exchanging within their class.

                              They've pushed compute into the cloud and with LLMs they anticipate doing the same for general labor. The bros are drooling over *also* consuming all the OpEx but aren't there yet.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • PositivDenken 馃くZ PositivDenken 馃く

                                @jenniferplusplus isn鈥檛 it that for instance the ancient Egyptian pyramids can be seen as similar efforts? Maybe a way to funnel excess wealth into sth that has zero value and is of no real world use.

                                KathmanduK This user is from outside of this forum
                                KathmanduK This user is from outside of this forum
                                Kathmandu
                                wrote last edited by
                                #21

                                @zeank @jenniferplusplus

                                My understanding is that was less wasting wealth, more a jobs program to give laborers income during the agricultural off-season. Like unemployment insurance, it spread money around so people wouldn't starve.

                                Whereas all this "AI investment" is channeling more and more money into fewer and fewer hands.

                                PositivDenken 馃くZ 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

                                  @zeank I don't know enough about ancient egypt to say with any confidence. But it does seem like a reasonable lens to view them through

                                  Rachel RawlingsL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Rachel RawlingsL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Rachel Rawlings
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #22

                                  @jenniferplusplus @zeank There will not be a tourism benefit for far future generations wanting to see data centers.

                                  螘位位蔚谓 螘渭委位喂伪 螁.味.F 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

                                    That's part of what makes a capital strike non-obvious, if you don't already know what it looks like. It's not just sitting on the money and refusing to spend it. Because that's the one thing you literally can't do with capital. If you leave those resources idle, especially labor, it just goes and does its own thing. You lose control over it. If you just fire everyone, they eventually start working for themselves.

                                    So, to conduct a capital strike, you have to direct the capital toward useless things. Or actually destructive things, if you can manage it.

                                    And thus, AI had "basically zero" effect on the GDP. Because it's economically worthless activity for the purpose of keeping all the resources occupied so they can't be put to any other use.

                                    Riley S. FaelanR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Riley S. FaelanR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Riley S. Faelan
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #23

                                    @jenniferplusplus The sillionaires (and people identifying with them) see adoption of AI as the real-economy counterpart to stocks buy-back. It's not supposed to produce further profits; it's supposed to concentrate the flow of existing profits to the sillionaires.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

                                      But, you have to understand what capital actual is. It's not money. Money is a loose proxy for capital, but that's all. Really, capital is control over economic resources. Raw resources, sure. Big industrial machinery, sure. Networks of transportation and communication, yes. And labor.

                                      Money is kind of the exchange medium for all of that. But capital isn't the money, and it's not the resources. It's the power to distort how those resources are used and applied to suit your own interests, at the expense of the other people involved.

                                      GregG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      GregG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Greg
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #24

                                      @jenniferplusplus equating "capitalism" with "trade" has been one of the biggest coups of discourse - you get people sincerely believing "well without capitalism would we just barter???" and now we must start everything by explaining that no, money was invented in 3000 BC, in fact Jesus was overturning moneylender tables 1500 years before the Dutch East India Company, etc

                                      GrovewestG 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • PositivDenken 馃くZ PositivDenken 馃く

                                        @jenniferplusplus isn鈥檛 it that for instance the ancient Egyptian pyramids can be seen as similar efforts? Maybe a way to funnel excess wealth into sth that has zero value and is of no real world use.

                                        Riley S. FaelanR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Riley S. FaelanR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Riley S. Faelan
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #25

                                        @zeank There's historians who would argue that the pyramids had value, just indirect ones. In most of such historians' telling, the value is in establishing methods for herding large numbers of workers. A major piece of the alleged supporting evidence is, a lot of the people who worked on pyramids seem to have worked on them for a limited time, and possibly, in times when other economic activity was on a downtrend.

                                        The GenAI craze has only partial possible counterpart to those: the "balancing the downtrend of other economic activity" detail.

                                        @jenniferplusplus

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Rachel RawlingsL Rachel Rawlings

                                          @jenniferplusplus @zeank There will not be a tourism benefit for far future generations wanting to see data centers.

                                          螘位位蔚谓 螘渭委位喂伪 螁.味.F This user is from outside of this forum
                                          螘位位蔚谓 螘渭委位喂伪 螁.味.F This user is from outside of this forum
                                          螘位位蔚谓 螘渭委位喂伪 螁.味.
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #26

                                          @linuxandyarn @jenniferplusplus @zeank lmao. that's a good point. they could at least make them aesthetically pleasing and not as noisy.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post