Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT.

UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
117 Posts 60 Posters 5 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • UilebheistU Uilebheist

    @mbpaz @cstross My router is over 18 years old, and I'm not replacing it. And I can prove its age.

    mbpazM This user is from outside of this forum
    mbpazM This user is from outside of this forum
    mbpaz
    wrote last edited by
    #58

    @Uilebheist @cstross "I'm an aging router, and I assume responsibility for any outbound packets these young devices connecting to me may send "

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

      @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad

      100% agreed...

      The entire bill is totally technically illiterate with all sorts of backfiring fishhooks... embarrasing really.

      No idea why Labour feels the need to do this sort of thing.

      Worldproof the child, not childproof the world. And parents' responsibility.

      Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
      Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
      Charlie Stross
      wrote last edited by
      #59

      @oschonrock @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Labour has a nasty paternalist/nanny state tradition going back over a century. It's baked in at this point: Labour knows what's best for you, peasant. (So do the Tories, but they approach it differently.)

      Oliver SchönrockO FonantF Ulrich_the_Elder, 🇨🇦,🇺🇦U 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

        @oschonrock @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Labour has a nasty paternalist/nanny state tradition going back over a century. It's baked in at this point: Labour knows what's best for you, peasant. (So do the Tories, but they approach it differently.)

        Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
        Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
        Oliver Schönrock
        wrote last edited by
        #60

        @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad

        Complex subject.

        For example, I would be quite pro a complete twitter ban in EU/UK.

        Is that "nanny state", or is that recognising that X is deliberately manipulated to be a malignant anti-democratic cancer?

        Porn for kids.... TBH, I get less excited about that, and selective blocking is hard/impractical.

        FonantF Magnus AhltorpA 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • FonantF Fonant

          @cstross @david_chisnall I'm not planning to do anything that would result in the government seizing my computer 🙂

          There is no way the government can know whether or not I use a VPN or not, nor whether I use TOR.

          Unless the law allows the police to randomly inspect people's computers, and they do this to a significant proportion of the population, I can use any VPN I like without fear. We don't live in a police state yet...

          Nicovel0 🍉N This user is from outside of this forum
          Nicovel0 🍉N This user is from outside of this forum
          Nicovel0 🍉
          wrote last edited by
          #61

          @Fonant @cstross @david_chisnall emphasis on yet. When you go through the U.K. border they can seize for inspection all devices you are carrying, no matter your citizenship.

          FonantF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

            RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

            UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

            *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

            Rhys 🦊S This user is from outside of this forum
            Rhys 🦊S This user is from outside of this forum
            Rhys 🦊
            wrote last edited by
            #62

            @cstross There's no way they can possibly enforce this for existing VPN users.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Nicovel0 🍉N Nicovel0 🍉

              @Fonant @cstross @david_chisnall emphasis on yet. When you go through the U.K. border they can seize for inspection all devices you are carrying, no matter your citizenship.

              FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
              FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
              Fonant
              wrote last edited by
              #63

              @Nicovel0 @cstross @david_chisnall Yeah, but I'm not going to be carrying my desktop computer on foreign trips.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

                @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad

                Complex subject.

                For example, I would be quite pro a complete twitter ban in EU/UK.

                Is that "nanny state", or is that recognising that X is deliberately manipulated to be a malignant anti-democratic cancer?

                Porn for kids.... TBH, I get less excited about that, and selective blocking is hard/impractical.

                FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                Fonant
                wrote last edited by
                #64

                @oschonrock @cstross @PeterSommerlad A ban on Twitter in the EU would also be impossible to enforce.

                Oliver SchönrockO 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                  @capriciousday Like banks and other financial institutions who require their employees to use them when working out of the office, or over wifi *within* the office.

                  HighlandLawyerH This user is from outside of this forum
                  HighlandLawyerH This user is from outside of this forum
                  HighlandLawyer
                  wrote last edited by
                  #65

                  @cstross @capriciousday Lawyers likewise. Working at home or in a court building, using confidential & legally privileged data on the office server...

                  UilebheistU Ben CurthoysB 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • HighlandLawyerH HighlandLawyer

                    @cstross @capriciousday Lawyers likewise. Working at home or in a court building, using confidential & legally privileged data on the office server...

                    UilebheistU This user is from outside of this forum
                    UilebheistU This user is from outside of this forum
                    Uilebheist
                    wrote last edited by
                    #66

                    @HighlandLawyer @cstross @capriciousday They'll argue that lawyers are over 18 "and why would be a problem to prove that?".
                    Remember it's the "Labour" party we are talking about.

                    HighlandLawyerH 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • FonantF Fonant

                      @oschonrock @cstross @PeterSommerlad A ban on Twitter in the EU would also be impossible to enforce.

                      Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                      Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                      Oliver Schönrock
                      wrote last edited by
                      #67

                      @Fonant @cstross @PeterSommerlad
                      Yes, I agree that geoblocking would have many holes (vpns, tor, etc), but that is acceptable in this case, IMO

                      Because the threat that ban would be trying protect against, is serious damage to Europe's democracies. Democracy is a numbers game by definition. So to eliminate a major source of malignant misinformation for say 90% people who can't be bothered to circumvent the geoblock, would destroy the network effect that is so core to any social network's power.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                        @oschonrock @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Labour has a nasty paternalist/nanny state tradition going back over a century. It's baked in at this point: Labour knows what's best for you, peasant. (So do the Tories, but they approach it differently.)

                        FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                        FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                        Fonant
                        wrote last edited by
                        #68

                        @cstross @oschonrock @PeterSommerlad We can happily discuss whether age restrictions on "VPN users" is a Good or Bad idea for a law.

                        My point is that it's impossible to enforce such a law.

                        It would be as pointless as the Online Safety Act. Well-intentioned, no doubt, but embarrassing when ignored. The 4chan bulletin board has been fined £20,000 and more for breaching the Online Safety Act. Their response has been "we don't care, we're not complying with a UK law, we're not going to pay any fines". The only thing Ofcom can do is to ask UK ISPs to block access to 4chan. They haven't yet, but if they do it'll be easily bypassed by a VPN or TOR.

                        Oliver SchönrockO 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • FonantF Fonant

                          @cstross @oschonrock @PeterSommerlad We can happily discuss whether age restrictions on "VPN users" is a Good or Bad idea for a law.

                          My point is that it's impossible to enforce such a law.

                          It would be as pointless as the Online Safety Act. Well-intentioned, no doubt, but embarrassing when ignored. The 4chan bulletin board has been fined £20,000 and more for breaching the Online Safety Act. Their response has been "we don't care, we're not complying with a UK law, we're not going to pay any fines". The only thing Ofcom can do is to ask UK ISPs to block access to 4chan. They haven't yet, but if they do it'll be easily bypassed by a VPN or TOR.

                          Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                          Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                          Oliver Schönrock
                          wrote last edited by
                          #69

                          @Fonant @cstross @PeterSommerlad

                          I agree that enforcement will be very leaky at best.

                          Whether that is "enough" depends on the case. In the case of X/twitter (see elsewhere) it might be, because the power of a network is proportional to N^2.

                          What makes the OSA very very stupid is that it subjects the 90% of the adult public who are using these services (ie porn etc) legally to a massive invasion of privacy with signficant risk of damaging data leaks by dodgy third parties.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • FonantF Fonant

                            @david_chisnall @cstross The government has to discover that there is an illegal VPN being used in the first place.

                            It is quite possible for millions of VPNs to be made available to UK children, hosted all over the world. Perhaps hosted by children, sharing the small monthly server costs. Quite secret, extremely difficult to find.

                            The proposed law could only ever hope to apply to a few big VPN companies. Which just moves the VPN usage by children underground, where other dangers lurk.

                            HighlandLawyerH This user is from outside of this forum
                            HighlandLawyerH This user is from outside of this forum
                            HighlandLawyer
                            wrote last edited by
                            #70

                            @Fonant @david_chisnall @cstross
                            "We don't need to worry, because the govt will not be able to enforce it" is the counterpart to legislators who say "we don't need to put in detailed definitions & restrictions, because we trust police & prosecutors to use the powers responsibly".
                            History has proven both are always true until they aren't.

                            FonantF Pete Alex Harris🦡🕸️🌲/∞🪐∫P Raven667R 3 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • HighlandLawyerH HighlandLawyer

                              @cstross @capriciousday Lawyers likewise. Working at home or in a court building, using confidential & legally privileged data on the office server...

                              Ben CurthoysB This user is from outside of this forum
                              Ben CurthoysB This user is from outside of this forum
                              Ben Curthoys
                              wrote last edited by
                              #71

                              @HighlandLawyer @cstross @capriciousday I don't see anything in the amendment that would apply to a business using e.g. Wireguard to access resources in an internal network. The definition of "relevant VPN service" "means a service of providing, in the course of a business, to a consumer, a virtual private network for accessing the internet". So B2C things only, not corporate VPNs.

                              Link Preview Image
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • UilebheistU Uilebheist

                                @HighlandLawyer @cstross @capriciousday They'll argue that lawyers are over 18 "and why would be a problem to prove that?".
                                Remember it's the "Labour" party we are talking about.

                                HighlandLawyerH This user is from outside of this forum
                                HighlandLawyerH This user is from outside of this forum
                                HighlandLawyer
                                wrote last edited by
                                #72

                                @Uilebheist @cstross @capriciousday So clerical staff will be required to use a separate computer system to the fee earners, since some of them may be 16 or 17?

                                And yes, it is IngSoc we're talking about.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • HighlandLawyerH HighlandLawyer

                                  @Fonant @david_chisnall @cstross
                                  "We don't need to worry, because the govt will not be able to enforce it" is the counterpart to legislators who say "we don't need to put in detailed definitions & restrictions, because we trust police & prosecutors to use the powers responsibly".
                                  History has proven both are always true until they aren't.

                                  FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Fonant
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #73

                                  Defining a "VPN" will be extremely difficult, but that's not my point.

                                  My point is that it is impossible to block access to VPNs, and equally impossible to ban them.

                                  This is a mathematical certainty. We can't un-learn how to have securely encrypted communications.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Nicovel0 🍉N Nicovel0 🍉

                                    @dan @jaawerth @cstross the judge will know when they take a look at it.

                                    JesseJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    JesseJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Jesse
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #74

                                    @Nicovel0 @dan @cstross

                                    "Did you pass the underage VPN ban?"
                                    "Sure did, boss! Required federated identity on every *nix host accessible from the UK, real impossible just like you asked!"

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

                                      @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad

                                      Complex subject.

                                      For example, I would be quite pro a complete twitter ban in EU/UK.

                                      Is that "nanny state", or is that recognising that X is deliberately manipulated to be a malignant anti-democratic cancer?

                                      Porn for kids.... TBH, I get less excited about that, and selective blocking is hard/impractical.

                                      Magnus AhltorpA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Magnus AhltorpA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Magnus Ahltorp
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #75

                                      @oschonrock @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad One reason for a Twitter ban is that it would then be much more difficult for people to excuse their presence there. And for people not wanting to be there but feel pressured to, to get an excuse to leave.

                                      Oliver SchönrockO 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • HighlandLawyerH HighlandLawyer

                                        @Fonant @david_chisnall @cstross
                                        "We don't need to worry, because the govt will not be able to enforce it" is the counterpart to legislators who say "we don't need to put in detailed definitions & restrictions, because we trust police & prosecutors to use the powers responsibly".
                                        History has proven both are always true until they aren't.

                                        Pete Alex Harris🦡🕸️🌲/∞🪐∫P This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Pete Alex Harris🦡🕸️🌲/∞🪐∫P This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Pete Alex Harris🦡🕸️🌲/∞🪐∫
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #76

                                        @HighlandLawyer @Fonant @david_chisnall @cstross

                                        Exactly this.

                                        A bad law isn't one that states its own intention to be abused, it's one that doesn't include specific concrete measures to prevent abuse, because the intent to abuse will surely come along soon enough, like it always has.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • FonantF Fonant

                                          @cstross @david_chisnall The likelihood of the police taking my computer for forensic examination is zero.

                                          I have plenty of things that I must keep private. So does everyone.

                                          Magnus AhltorpA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Magnus AhltorpA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Magnus Ahltorp
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #77

                                          @Fonant @cstross @david_chisnall One should design a society so that there is as little as possible for the people in power to grab on to once it becomes a police state. A legislation process that only considers fair weather is really bad, and the weather already seems kind of cloudy.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post