Let's be clear.
-
Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.
Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.
That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.
The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America
The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of
Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)
@QasimRashid If this doesn't prove to women that complying with patriarchy (in this case, by marrying and taking husbands' names) to avoid conflict and be granted limited privileges is a really bad plan, I don't know what will.
-
Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.
Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.
That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.
The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America
The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of
Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)
@QasimRashid This is a case where ideology is more important than being patriotic to your country
-
Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.
Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.
That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.
The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America
The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of
Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)
The tiny minded are at it again. The SAVE act. Anyone who understands how our voting is done knows that fraud on a voter level is almost impossible. Only the morons that follow de Fuhrer think it's ever been done.
So I propose a way to fix all the problems:
All American Citizens outsides the US & "Everyone" in the nation can vote, in the same way everyone has judicial rights.
We can call it the "Save Us From Idiots" voting law. SUFI Yea, I'm not really good at Anachronisms.
-
Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.
Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.
That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.
The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America
The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of
Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)
@QasimRashid And 5 million adoptees expected to dig up birth certificates? When only 16 states five adoptees access?!?
-
Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.
Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.
That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.
The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America
The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of
Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)
@QasimRashid Let's hope this next act of cruelty and anti-intellect evaporates.... I mean since they've completely chucked legitimacy and are going for rule by force - it's mostly even unnecessary to do something stupid like trying to roll back voters rights. Just put the damned swastika arm bands on already..
-
@Dwebster @QasimRashid LOTS of people do not actually have that. Why do you think so many states over non-REAL ID ID's?
-
@Dwebster @QasimRashid Tell me you didn't read the article without telling me you didn't read the article.
-
@Dwebster @QasimRashid By requiring documents that most either do not have or do not match their current name (for example married women using their husband's last name). Also I suggest reading up on administrative burden and how it is used to deny service. Also, also the numbers just don't make sense. To stop maybe a few hundred illegal votes, you would prevent millions from voting. That's just straight up absurd
-
Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.
Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.
That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.
The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America
The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of
Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)
@QasimRashid This proposal's purpose is brazenly to get Trump and his MAGAt party past the November election without having to cancel it outright.
Without it, Trump and the GOP face a near-guaranteed wipeout in November. While at most 1/3ed of the Senate changes hands (not enough to remove Trump after impeacement), another impeachment vote in the House will be probable along with a hornet's nest of investigations that will hang out much GOP dirty laundry to dry in public.
What will NOT happen in that case is a robust Epstein investigation as that one is bipartisan.
-
@QasimRashid This is a case where ideology is more important than being patriotic to your country
@Robo105 @QasimRashid Holding, exercising power over others in a former democracy.
🤬 -
@Dwebster @QasimRashid A bill's effects are more than simply its text, which anyone with any sense knows.
-
@Dwebster @remywhisker @QasimRashid “Millions trying to vote illegally with the encouragement of democrats”
Sadly you just impeached yourself. Layoff the Rightwing Koolaid, your perception will skew back to reality. -
@Dwebster @Huntn00 @remywhisker @QasimRashid "Impeach" can also mean "to call into question" or "to discredit." The irony of telling someone else to "learn the definition of words" when you haven't cared to do so yourself...
-
@Dwebster @remywhisker @QasimRashid “Millions trying to vote illegally with the encouragement of democrats”
Sadly you just impeached yourself. Layoff the Rightwing Koolaid, your perception will skew back to reality.@Huntn00 @remywhisker @QasimRashid don't engage the bot accounts.
-
Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.
Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.
That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.
The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America
The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of
Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)
@QasimRashid What was that about election interference?
-
Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.
Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.
That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.
The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America
The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of
Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)
@QasimRashid Let’s sound the alarm and get this blocked. We can do it.
-
Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.
Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.
That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.
The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America
The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of
Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)
@QasimRashid what’s our plan to stop this?
-
Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.
Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.
That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.
The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America
The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of
Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)
@QasimRashid Elect enoujgh women to Congress and the Senate and they might just End Men.
-
@QasimRashid If this doesn't prove to women that complying with patriarchy (in this case, by marrying and taking husbands' names) to avoid conflict and be granted limited privileges is a really bad plan, I don't know what will.
@PedestrianError @QasimRashid
Sharing a name short-circuits so many difficulties in day to day life - from sharing bank or credit accounts to insurance to visitation at hospitals or even just dealing with paying utility bills.This also applies to adopted children, orphaned, or step children just as much as women.
To pretend that it has no advantages to change is just as blind as to say it should be required to change.
As someone who has changed her name more than once - people should have the name they want.
This is designed to disenfranchise everyone who's not had a perfect white Christian male life.
-
@QasimRashid This proposal's purpose is brazenly to get Trump and his MAGAt party past the November election without having to cancel it outright.
Without it, Trump and the GOP face a near-guaranteed wipeout in November. While at most 1/3ed of the Senate changes hands (not enough to remove Trump after impeacement), another impeachment vote in the House will be probable along with a hornet's nest of investigations that will hang out much GOP dirty laundry to dry in public.
What will NOT happen in that case is a robust Epstein investigation as that one is bipartisan.
@LukefromDC @QasimRashid
If every Republican Senator seat all lost it would be enough to remove him from office. Highly unlikely but not actually mathematically ruled out.
